Suppr超能文献

卡托普利、阿替洛尔、拉贝洛尔和吲哚洛尔治疗合并间歇性跛行高血压的安慰剂对照比较

Placebo-controlled comparison of captopril, atenolol, labetalol, and pindolol in hypertension complicated by intermittent claudication.

作者信息

Roberts D H, Tsao Y, McLoughlin G A, Breckenridge A

出版信息

Lancet. 1987 Sep 19;2(8560):650-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92441-x.

Abstract

In a six month placebo-controlled cross-over trial twenty patients with hypertension and peripheral arterial disease were randomised to captopril 25 mg twice daily, atenolol 100 mg once daily, labetalol 200 mg twice daily, or pindolol 10 mg twice daily for one month. Although all treatments were equally effective at lowering blood pressure, pain-free and maximum walking distances on a treadmill were decreased by atenolol, labetalol, and pindolol, but not by captopril. Post-exercise calf blood flow availability was impaired by atenolol, labetalol, and pindolol, but not by captopril. Despite ancillary characteristics of cardioselectivity, intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, or combination with alpha-blockade, beta-blockers seem to impair the lower limb circulation in such patients, whereas captopril seems to preserve it, possibly by maintaining the collateral blood supply.

摘要

在一项为期六个月的安慰剂对照交叉试验中,20名患有高血压和外周动脉疾病的患者被随机分为四组,分别每日两次服用25毫克卡托普利、每日一次服用100毫克阿替洛尔、每日两次服用200毫克拉贝洛尔或每日两次服用10毫克吲哚洛尔,为期一个月。尽管所有治疗在降低血压方面同样有效,但阿替洛尔、拉贝洛尔和吲哚洛尔会缩短跑步机上无痛及最大行走距离,而卡托普利则不会。运动后小腿血流供应在服用阿替洛尔、拉贝洛尔和吲哚洛尔后受损,但卡托普利不会。尽管β受体阻滞剂具有心脏选择性、内在拟交感活性或与α受体阻滞联合使用等辅助特性,但这类药物似乎会损害此类患者的下肢循环,而卡托普利似乎能维持下肢循环,可能是通过维持侧支血液供应来实现的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验