Raanan Rachel, Gunier Robert B, Balmes John R, Beltran Alyssa J, Harley Kim G, Bradman Asa, Eskenazi Brenda
Center for Environmental Research and Children's Health (CERCH), School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley , Berkeley, California, USA.
Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley , Berkeley, California, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Aug 10;125(8):087007. doi: 10.1289/EHP528.
Elemental sulfur, "the oldest of all pesticides," is the most heavily used agricultural pesticide in California and Europe. Sulfur is considered relatively safe and is used in both conventional and organic farming systems. Adverse respiratory effects have been reported in applicators and animals, but the effect on residential populations, and especially on children living in proximity to fields treated with elemental sulfur, is not known.
We evaluated associations between residential proximity to elemental sulfur applications and respiratory symptoms and spirometry of children living in an agricultural community.
Participants were enrolled in the CHAMACOS longitudinal birth cohort. We collected respiratory symptomatology for 347 children at 7 y of age and measured spirometry on a subset of 279. Of these, estimations of proximity to sulfur application and relevant covariate data were available for 237 and 205 children for whom we had symptomatology information and FEV measurements, respectively. Data from the California Pesticide Use Reporting System were used to estimate the amount of elemental sulfur applied within 0.5, 1, and 3km of a child's residence during the week, month, and 12 mo prior to pulmonary evaluation. Regression models controlled for maternal smoking during pregnancy; season of birth; PM (particulate matter ≤2.5mm in aerodynamic diameter); breast feeding duration; child's sex, age, and height; technician; and other covariates.
Adverse associations with respiratory outcomes were found for sulfur applications within 0.5- and 1-km radii. Specifically, asthma medication usage and respiratory symptoms increased [OR=3.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50, 8.23, =0.004; OR=2.09; 95% CI: 1.27, 3.46, =0.004, respectively] and FEV decreased (β=−0.143; 95% CI: −0.248, −0.039, =0.008) per 10-fold increase in the estimated amount of sulfur used within 1 km of child residence during the year prior to pulmonary evaluation.
This study suggests that elemental sulfur use, allowed in both organic and conventional farming, in close proximity to residential areas, may adversely affect children's respiratory health. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP528.
元素硫是“最古老的农药”,是加利福尼亚州和欧洲使用最广泛的农业杀虫剂。硫被认为相对安全,用于传统和有机耕作系统。已有报告称施药者和动物会出现呼吸道不良反应,但对居民,尤其是对居住在施用元素硫农田附近的儿童的影响尚不清楚。
我们评估了居住在农业社区的儿童与施用元素硫的农田的距离与呼吸道症状及肺功能之间的关联。
参与者来自CHAMACOS纵向出生队列。我们收集了347名7岁儿童的呼吸道症状,并对其中279名儿童进行了肺功能测量。其中,分别有237名和205名儿童可获得与硫施用距离的估计值及相关协变量数据,我们掌握这两组儿童的症状信息和第一秒用力呼气量(FEV)测量值。加利福尼亚农药使用报告系统的数据用于估计在肺部评估前一周、一个月和12个月内,儿童住所0.5公里、1公里和3公里范围内施用的元素硫量。回归模型对孕期母亲吸烟情况、出生季节、细颗粒物(空气动力学直径≤2.5毫米的颗粒物)、母乳喂养持续时间、儿童性别、年龄和身高、技术员以及其他协变量进行了控制。
在半径0.5公里和1公里范围内施用硫与呼吸道不良后果相关。具体而言,在肺部评估前一年,儿童住所1公里范围内估计硫用量每增加10倍,哮喘药物使用量和呼吸道症状增加[比值比(OR)=3.51;95%置信区间(CI):1.50,8.23,P=0.004;OR=2.09;95%CI:1.27,3.46,P=0.004],FEV降低(β=-0.143;95%CI:-0.248,-0.039,P=0.008)。
本研究表明,有机和传统农业中在居民区附近使用元素硫可能会对儿童的呼吸道健康产生不利影响。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP528 。