Islami Arezoo, Longo Giuseppe
Stanford University, Department of Philosophy, USA.
Centre Cavaillès, CNRS - Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris and Department of Integrative Physiology and Pathobiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, USA.
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2017 Dec;131:179-192. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
The human attempts to access, measure and organize physical phenomena have led to a manifold construction of mathematical and physical spaces. We will survey the evolution of geometries from Euclid to the Algebraic Geometry of the 20th century. The role of Persian/Arabic Algebra in this transition and its Western symbolic development is emphasized. In this relation, we will also discuss changes in the ontological attitudes toward mathematics and its applications. Historically, the encounter of geometric and algebraic perspectives enriched the mathematical practices and their foundations. Yet, the collapse of Euclidean certitudes, of over 2300 years, and the crisis in the mathematical analysis of the 19th century, led to the exclusion of "geometric judgments" from the foundations of Mathematics. After the success and the limits of the logico-formal analysis, it is necessary to broaden our foundational tools and re-examine the interactions with natural sciences. In particular, the way the geometric and algebraic approaches organize knowledge is analyzed as a cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural issue and will be examined in Mathematical Physics and Biology. We finally discuss how the current notions of mathematical (phase) "space" should be revisited for the purposes of life sciences.
人类尝试获取、测量和组织物理现象,这导致了数学和物理空间的多种构建。我们将审视从欧几里得几何到20世纪代数几何的几何学演变。强调了波斯/阿拉伯代数在这一转变中的作用及其在西方的符号发展。在此背景下,我们还将讨论对数学及其应用的本体论态度的变化。从历史上看,几何和代数观点的碰撞丰富了数学实践及其基础。然而,长达2300多年的欧几里得确定性的瓦解以及19世纪数学分析中的危机,导致“几何判断”被排除在数学基础之外。在逻辑形式分析取得成功和存在局限性之后,有必要拓宽我们的基础工具,并重新审视与自然科学的相互作用。特别是,几何和代数方法组织知识的方式被作为一个跨学科和跨文化问题进行分析,并将在数学物理和生物学中进行研究。我们最后讨论为了生命科学的目的,应如何重新审视当前数学(相位)“空间”的概念。