Suppr超能文献

自助组织作为医疗保健和政策决策中的患者代表。

Self-help organisations as patient representatives in health care and policy decision-making.

机构信息

Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), Stubenring 6, 1010, Vienna, Austria.

Institute of Sociology, University of Vienna, Rooseveltplatz 2, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2017 Oct;121(10):1047-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Sep 2.

Abstract

A crucial question about participation is who is legitimised, willing and capable of representing particular collectives. Social insurance health care systems tend to focus on representation by patient organisations. Self-help organisations (SHOs), as one type of 'health consumer and patient organisation', often take over this role. Research findings indicate that participation by SHOs is accompanied by high expectations, but also by concerns about the risks of instrumental abuse, overload and professionalisation. However, there is a dearth of in-depth knowledge about both potential and risks of participating for the SHO. To tackle this research gap, a qualitative study design was used to investigate fifteen SHOs in Austria. Data were generated by expert interviews with SHO representatives and documentary analysis of SHO websites. Content analysis was applied. SHOs in Austria advocate for patients' interests, participate in invited spaces and have various forms of cooperative relations with the health care system. Thereby, they draw on the experiential knowledge of their members without, however, systematising it. Experiences with professionalisation and instrumental use are ambiguous, whereas overload is prevalent. SHOs need resources for reflection in order to define their position visà- vis the health system and to realise their potential as patient representatives. Deepening co-operation with the health care system might lead to new participatory practices acknowledging differences in culture and the resources of both sides.

摘要

关于参与的一个关键问题是,谁是被认可的、愿意的和有能力代表特定群体的人。社会保险医疗保健系统往往侧重于患者组织的代表性。自助组织(SHO)作为“医疗消费者和患者组织”的一种类型,往往承担着这一角色。研究结果表明,SHO 的参与伴随着很高的期望,但也伴随着对工具滥用、超负荷和专业化风险的担忧。然而,对于 SHO 参与的潜在风险和利益,我们知之甚少。为了解决这一研究空白,采用定性研究设计,对奥地利的 15 个 SHO 进行了研究。通过对 SHO 代表的专家访谈和对 SHO 网站的文献分析来收集数据。采用内容分析法。奥地利的 SHO 倡导患者利益,参与受邀空间,并与医疗保健系统建立各种形式的合作关系。由此,他们利用其成员的经验知识,但不将其系统化。在专业化和工具使用方面的经验是模棱两可的,而超负荷则很普遍。SHO 需要资源来进行反思,以便为他们在卫生系统中的立场,并实现他们作为患者代表的潜力。深化与医疗保健系统的合作可能会导致新的参与实践,承认双方在文化和资源方面的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验