• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自助组织作为医疗保健和政策决策中的患者代表。

Self-help organisations as patient representatives in health care and policy decision-making.

机构信息

Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), Stubenring 6, 1010, Vienna, Austria.

Institute of Sociology, University of Vienna, Rooseveltplatz 2, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2017 Oct;121(10):1047-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.012
PMID:28890239
Abstract

A crucial question about participation is who is legitimised, willing and capable of representing particular collectives. Social insurance health care systems tend to focus on representation by patient organisations. Self-help organisations (SHOs), as one type of 'health consumer and patient organisation', often take over this role. Research findings indicate that participation by SHOs is accompanied by high expectations, but also by concerns about the risks of instrumental abuse, overload and professionalisation. However, there is a dearth of in-depth knowledge about both potential and risks of participating for the SHO. To tackle this research gap, a qualitative study design was used to investigate fifteen SHOs in Austria. Data were generated by expert interviews with SHO representatives and documentary analysis of SHO websites. Content analysis was applied. SHOs in Austria advocate for patients' interests, participate in invited spaces and have various forms of cooperative relations with the health care system. Thereby, they draw on the experiential knowledge of their members without, however, systematising it. Experiences with professionalisation and instrumental use are ambiguous, whereas overload is prevalent. SHOs need resources for reflection in order to define their position visà- vis the health system and to realise their potential as patient representatives. Deepening co-operation with the health care system might lead to new participatory practices acknowledging differences in culture and the resources of both sides.

摘要

关于参与的一个关键问题是,谁是被认可的、愿意的和有能力代表特定群体的人。社会保险医疗保健系统往往侧重于患者组织的代表性。自助组织(SHO)作为“医疗消费者和患者组织”的一种类型,往往承担着这一角色。研究结果表明,SHO 的参与伴随着很高的期望,但也伴随着对工具滥用、超负荷和专业化风险的担忧。然而,对于 SHO 参与的潜在风险和利益,我们知之甚少。为了解决这一研究空白,采用定性研究设计,对奥地利的 15 个 SHO 进行了研究。通过对 SHO 代表的专家访谈和对 SHO 网站的文献分析来收集数据。采用内容分析法。奥地利的 SHO 倡导患者利益,参与受邀空间,并与医疗保健系统建立各种形式的合作关系。由此,他们利用其成员的经验知识,但不将其系统化。在专业化和工具使用方面的经验是模棱两可的,而超负荷则很普遍。SHO 需要资源来进行反思,以便为他们在卫生系统中的立场,并实现他们作为患者代表的潜力。深化与医疗保健系统的合作可能会导致新的参与实践,承认双方在文化和资源方面的差异。

相似文献

1
Self-help organisations as patient representatives in health care and policy decision-making.自助组织作为医疗保健和政策决策中的患者代表。
Health Policy. 2017 Oct;121(10):1047-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
2
Legislating Patient Representation: A Comparison Between Austrian and German Regulations on Self-Help Organizations as Patient Representatives.为患者代表立法:奥地利与德国关于自助组织作为患者代表的法规比较
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):351-358. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9864-7. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
3
[Recruitment and activation of members in self-help organisations. Results of a survey of self-help organisations at the national level].[自助组织中成员的招募与激活。一项全国性自助组织调查的结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Oct;72(10):729-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1239566. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
4
[Mutual self-help and patient participiation: current developments in Austria].[互助与患者参与:奥地利的当前发展情况]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Jan;62(1):56-63. doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2852-6.
5
Organising for self-advocacy in mental health: experiences from seven African countries.心理健康自我维权组织:七个非洲国家的经验
Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg). 2013 May;16(3):187-95. doi: 10.4314/ajpsy.v16i3.25.
6
Financial interests of patient organisations contributing to technology assessment at England's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: policy review.患者组织对英格兰国家卫生与保健优化研究所技术评估的财务利益贡献:政策回顾。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 16;364:k5300. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5300.
7
The perceived impact of public involvement in palliative care in a provincial palliative care network in the Netherlands: a qualitative study.荷兰某省级姑息治疗网络中公众参与姑息治疗的感知影响:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3186-200. doi: 10.1111/hex.12308. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
8
Pathways to translating experiential knowledge into mental health policy.将经验知识转化为心理健康政策的途径。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2011 Summer;35(1):29-36. doi: 10.2975/35.1.2011.29.36.
9
[Advanced training program seeking to strengthen nationwide self-help organizations: development of the ÖKUSS advanced training concept].[旨在加强全国自助组织的高级培训项目:ÖKUSS 高级培训概念的发展]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Jun;163:20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 May 24.
10
Understanding the role of patient organizations in health technology assessment.了解患者组织在卫生技术评估中的作用。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3349-57. doi: 10.1111/hex.12325. Epub 2014 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Between willingness and practice: a nationwide survey of 1,334 German patient organization members on user involvement in digital service development.意愿与实践之间:对1334名德国患者组织成员关于用户参与数字服务开发的全国性调查。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 6;7:1591981. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1591981. eCollection 2025.
2
Putting the WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan into Practice: Establishing the Austrian Patient Council as a Best Practice Example of Patient Involvement.将世界卫生组织全球患者安全行动计划付诸实践:将奥地利患者委员会确立为患者参与的最佳实践范例。
J Patient Exp. 2025 May 19;12:23743735251331657. doi: 10.1177/23743735251331657. eCollection 2025.
3
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.
消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
4
Patients' perception of changes and consequences after tumor resection : A qualitative study in Austrian patients with musculoskeletal malignancies.患者对肿瘤切除后变化和后果的感知:奥地利肌肉骨骼恶性肿瘤患者的定性研究。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Jun;135(11-12):301-310. doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02136-6. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
5
Self-help friendliness in cancer care: A cross-sectional study among self-help group leaders in Germany.癌症关怀中的自助友好性:德国自助团体领导者的横断面研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3005-3016. doi: 10.1111/hex.13608. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
6
Measuring Development of Self-Help Organizations for Patients with Chronic Health Conditions in Hong Kong: Development and Validation of the Self-Help Organization Development Scale (SHODS).测量香港慢性健康状况患者自助组织的发展:自助组织发展量表(SHODS)的编制与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031351.