Suppr超能文献

“马鲁马/塔凯特”何时失效?两项关键失败案例及一项荟萃分析表明音系学和音位结构规则很重要。

When Does Maluma/Takete Fail? Two Key Failures and a Meta-Analysis Suggest That Phonology and Phonotactics Matter.

作者信息

Styles Suzy J, Gawne Lauren

机构信息

Division of Psychology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

SOAS, University of London, England; La Trobe University, Australia.

出版信息

Iperception. 2017 Aug 25;8(4):2041669517724807. doi: 10.1177/2041669517724807. eCollection 2017 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Eighty-seven years ago, Köhler reported that the majority of students picked the same answer in a quiz: Which novel word form ('maluma' or 'takete') went best with which abstract line drawing (one curved, one angular). Others have consistently shown the effect in a variety of contexts, with only one reported failure by Rogers and Ross. In the spirit of transparency, we report our own failure in the same journal. In our study, speakers of Syuba, from the Himalaya in Nepal, do not show a preference when matching word forms 'kiki' and 'bubu' to spiky versus curvy shapes. We conducted a meta-analysis of previous studies to investigate the relationship between pseudoword legality and task effects. Our combined analyses suggest a common source for both of the failures: 'wordiness' - We believe these tests fail when the test words do not behave according to the sound structure of the target language.

摘要

87年前,科勒报告称,大多数学生在一次测验中选择了相同的答案:哪种新造词形式(“马鲁马”或“塔凯特”)与哪种抽象线条画(一条曲线,一条直线)最搭配。其他人在各种情境中也一直证明了这种效应,只有罗杰斯和罗斯报告过一次失败案例。本着透明公开的精神,我们在同一期刊上报告了我们自己的失败案例。在我们的研究中,来自尼泊尔喜马拉雅地区的叙巴语使用者在将“基基”和“布布”这两个词形式与尖形和曲线形进行匹配时并没有表现出偏好。我们对之前的研究进行了荟萃分析,以调查伪词合法性与任务效应之间的关系。我们的综合分析表明这两次失败存在一个共同原因:“冗长性”——我们认为,当测试词不符合目标语言的语音结构时,这些测试就会失败。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f21/5574486/b993a6f7a6a9/10.1177_2041669517724807-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验