Tadesse Birkneh Tilahun, Ashley Elizabeth A, Ongarello Stefano, Havumaki Joshua, Wijegoonewardena Miranga, González Iveth J, Dittrich Sabine
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Campus Biotech Building B2 Level 0, 9 Chemin des Mines, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 11;17(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2713-1.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is widely acknowledged as a global problem, yet in many parts of the world its magnitude is still not well understood. This review, using a public health focused approach, aimed to understand and describe the current status of AMR in Africa in relation to common causes of infections and drugs recommended in WHO treatment guidelines.
PubMed, EMBASE and other relevant databases were searched for recent articles (2013-2016) in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Article retrieval and screening were done using a structured search string and strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. Median and interquartile ranges of percent resistance were calculated for each antibiotic-bacterium combination.
AMR data was not available for 42.6% of the countries in the African continent. A total of 144 articles were included in the final analysis. 13 Gram negative and 5 Gram positive bacteria were tested against 37 different antibiotics. Penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae was reported in 14/144studies (median resistance (MR): 26.7%). Further 18/53 (34.0%) of Haemophilus influenza isolates were resistant to amoxicillin. MR of Escherichia coli to amoxicillin, trimethoprim and gentamicin was 88.1%, 80.7% and 29.8% respectively. Ciprofloxacin resistance in Salmonella Typhi was rare. No documented ceftriaxone resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae was reported, while the MR for quinolone was 37.5%. Carbapenem resistance was common in Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa but uncommon in Enterobacteriaceae.
Our review highlights three important findings. First, recent AMR data is not available for more than 40% of the countries. Second, the level of resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics was significant. Third, the quality of microbiological data is of serious concern. Our findings underline that to conserve our current arsenal of antibiotics it is imperative to address the gaps in AMR diagnostic standardization and reporting and use available information to optimize treatment guidelines.
抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)被广泛认为是一个全球性问题,但在世界许多地区,其严重程度仍未得到充分了解。本综述采用以公共卫生为重点的方法,旨在了解和描述非洲AMR的现状,以及与常见感染原因和世界卫生组织治疗指南中推荐药物的关系。
根据PRISMA指南,在PubMed、EMBASE和其他相关数据库中检索近期文章(2013 - 2016年)。使用结构化搜索字符串和严格的纳入/排除标准进行文章检索和筛选。计算每种抗生素 - 细菌组合的耐药百分比的中位数和四分位数间距。
非洲大陆42.6%的国家没有AMR数据。最终分析共纳入144篇文章。对13种革兰氏阴性菌和5种革兰氏阳性菌进行了37种不同抗生素的测试。144项研究中有14项报告了肺炎链球菌对青霉素的耐药性(中位耐药率(MR):26.7%)。此外,53株流感嗜血杆菌分离株中有18株(34.0%)对阿莫西林耐药。大肠杆菌对阿莫西林、甲氧苄啶和庆大霉素的MR分别为88.1%、80.7%和29.8%。伤寒沙门氏菌对环丙沙星的耐药性罕见。未报告淋病奈瑟菌对头孢曲松的耐药记录,而喹诺酮的MR为37.5%。碳青霉烯耐药在不动杆菌属和铜绿假单胞菌中常见,但在肠杆菌科中不常见。
我们的综述突出了三个重要发现。第一,超过40%的国家没有近期的AMR数据。第二,对常用抗生素的耐药水平很高。第三,微生物学数据的质量令人严重担忧。我们的研究结果强调,为了保留我们目前的抗生素库,必须解决AMR诊断标准化和报告方面的差距,并利用现有信息优化治疗指南。