Robertson Julia M, Kingsley Barbara E, Ford Gina C
1 Buckinghamshire New University, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom.
Evol Psychol. 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):1474704917730640. doi: 10.1177/1474704917730640.
Faciometrics have widely been used in contemporary studies on gender-related behavioral traits, for example, perceived and actual aggression, co-operation and trustworthiness, prejudicial beliefs, unethical behavior, and achievement drive, as well as, but to a lesser degree, in nonhuman primates. For the large part, these studies have focused primarily on "student-aged" populations with little empirical scrutiny regarding the efficacy of applying these measures with older participants. This study therefore investigated sexual dimorphism across four age-groups (20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s) in 444 participants (225 men). The expected sexual dimorphism was seen in the youngest age group in three of the four indices. The facial width to height ratio, however, although most commonly used empirically, was not found to be significantly different between men and women, consistent with more recent literature. Importantly, as age increased, sexual dimorphism decreased, but this was not consistent across all measures of it. Rather, it is evident that differing measures of sexual dimorphism follow distinct developmental trajectories. The only single marker which remained significantly different across all age-groups was cheekbone prominence. Sexual dimorphic faciometrics are therefore dynamic, declining, and differentiated through adulthood. Consequently, it is concluded that care should be taken in using faciometrics in studies involving older populations and that more research is needed to understand the impact of these distinct faciometric trajectories in gender- and masculinity-related studies.
面部测量学已广泛应用于当代有关性别相关行为特征的研究中,例如,感知到的和实际的攻击性、合作与可信度、偏见信念、不道德行为以及成就驱动力,在非人类灵长类动物中应用程度较低。在很大程度上,这些研究主要集中在“学生年龄段”人群,对于将这些测量方法应用于年龄较大的参与者的有效性几乎没有实证研究。因此,本研究调查了444名参与者(225名男性)中四个年龄组(20多岁、30多岁、40多岁和50多岁)的性别二态性。在四个指标中的三个指标上,最年轻的年龄组出现了预期的性别二态性。然而,面部宽高比虽然在实证研究中最常用,但并未发现男性和女性之间存在显著差异,这与最近的文献一致。重要的是,随着年龄的增长,性别二态性降低,但并非在所有测量指标上都是如此。相反,很明显,不同的性别二态性测量指标遵循不同的发展轨迹。在所有年龄组中唯一保持显著差异的单一指标是颧骨突出度。因此,性别二态性面部测量学在成年期是动态变化的、逐渐减少的且具有差异性。因此,得出的结论是,在涉及老年人群的研究中使用面部测量学时应谨慎,并且需要更多的研究来了解这些不同的面部测量轨迹在性别和男性气质相关研究中的影响。