• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症死亡率评分用于预测脓毒症患者的死亡率。

Sepsis mortality score for the prediction of mortality in septic patients.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia, 25200 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia, 25200 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2018 Feb;43:163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.009
PMID:28903084
Abstract

PURPOSE

To derive a prediction equation for 30-day mortality in sepsis using a multi-marker approach and compare its performance to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.

METHODS

This study included 159 septic patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Leukocytes count, procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and paraoxonase (PON) and arylesterase (ARE) activities of PON-1 were assayed from blood obtained on ICU presentation. Logistic regression was used to derive sepsis mortality score (SMS), a prediction equation describing the relationship between biomarkers and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate was 28.9%. The SMS was [еlogit(p)/(1+еlogit(p))]×100; logit(p)=0.74+(0.004×PCT)+(0.001×IL-6)-(0.025×ARE)-(0.059×leukocytes count). The SMC had higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% Cl) than SOFA score [0.814 (0.736-0.892) vs. 0.767 (0.677-0.857)], but is not statistically significant. When the SMS was added to the SOFA score, prediction of 30-day mortality improved compared to SOFA score used alone [0.845 (0.777-0.899), p=0.022].

CONCLUSIONS

A sepsis mortality score using baseline leukocytes count, PCT, IL-6 and ARE was derived, which predicted 30-day mortality with very good performance and added significant prognostic information to SOFA score.

摘要

目的

使用多标志物方法推导脓毒症 30 天死亡率的预测方程,并将其与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分进行比较。

方法

本研究纳入了 159 名入住重症监护病房的脓毒症患者。在入住 ICU 时采集血液,检测白细胞计数、降钙素原(PCT)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)以及 PON-1 的对氧磷酶(PON)和芳基酯酶(ARE)活性。使用逻辑回归推导脓毒症死亡率评分(SMS),这是一个描述生物标志物与 30 天死亡率之间关系的预测方程。

结果

30 天死亡率为 28.9%。SMS 为 [еlogit(p)/(1+еlogit(p))]×100;logit(p)=0.74+(0.004×PCT)+(0.001×IL-6)-(0.025×ARE)-(0.059×白细胞计数)。SMS 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(95%置信区间)大于 SOFA 评分[0.814(0.736-0.892)与 0.767(0.677-0.857)],但无统计学意义。与单独使用 SOFA 评分相比,将 SMS 添加到 SOFA 评分中可改善 30 天死亡率的预测[0.845(0.777-0.899),p=0.022]。

结论

使用基线白细胞计数、PCT、IL-6 和 ARE 推导了一个脓毒症死亡率评分,该评分能够很好地预测 30 天死亡率,并为 SOFA 评分提供了重要的预后信息。

相似文献

1
Sepsis mortality score for the prediction of mortality in septic patients.脓毒症死亡率评分用于预测脓毒症患者的死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2018 Feb;43:163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
2
The diagnostic ability of procalcitonin and interleukin-6 to differentiate infectious from noninfectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome and to predict mortality.降钙素原和白细胞介素-6鉴别感染性与非感染性全身炎症反应综合征以及预测死亡率的诊断能力。
J Crit Care. 2016 Jun;33:245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
3
Diagnostic and predictive performance of biomarkers in patients with sepsis in an intensive care unit.重症监护病房中脓毒症患者生物标志物的诊断和预测性能
J Int Med Res. 2019 Jan;47(1):44-58. doi: 10.1177/0300060518793791. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
4
Prognostic evaluation of severe sepsis and septic shock: procalcitonin clearance vs Δ Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.严重脓毒症和感染性休克的预后评估:降钙素原清除率与Δ序贯器官衰竭评估。
J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):219.e9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
5
[The prognostic value of serum procalcitonin on severity of illness in non-sepsis critically ill patients].[血清降钙素原对非脓毒症危重症患者病情严重程度的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2016 Aug;28(8):688-93. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.08.004.
6
Serum procalcitonin level and SOFA score at discharge from the intensive care unit predict post-intensive care unit mortality: a prospective study.重症监护病房出院时的血清降钙素原水平和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分可预测重症监护病房后的死亡率:一项前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 2;9(12):e114007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114007. eCollection 2014.
7
[Prognostic value of lipopolysaccharide binding protein and procalcitonin in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to intensive care].[脂多糖结合蛋白和降钙素原在入住重症监护病房的严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者中的预后价值]
Med Intensiva. 2015 May;39(4):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
8
[Analysis of death risk factors for nosocomial infection patients in an ICU: a retrospective review of 864 patients from 2009 to 2015].[重症监护病房医院感染患者死亡危险因素分析:对2009年至2015年864例患者的回顾性研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2016 Aug;28(8):704-8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.08.007.
9
Are prognostic scores and biomarkers such as procalcitonin the appropriate prognostic precursors for elderly patients with sepsis in the emergency department?对于急诊科的老年脓毒症患者,降钙素原等预后评分和生物标志物是否为合适的预后先兆指标?
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016 Oct;28(5):917-24. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0500-7. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
10
Revisiting the prognostic value of monocyte chemotactic protein 1 and interleukin-6 in the sepsis-3 era.重新探讨单核细胞趋化蛋白 1 和白细胞介素-6 在 sepsis-3 时代的预后价值。
J Crit Care. 2018 Feb;43:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Plasma proteomics identifies molecular subtypes in sepsis.血浆蛋白质组学可识别脓毒症的分子亚型。
Crit Care. 2025 Sep 2;29(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05639-6.
2
Potential role of mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 as a biomarker in patients with sepsis and septic shock: A prospective observational study.线粒体解偶联蛋白2作为脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者生物标志物的潜在作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Aug;68(8):718-724. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1181_23. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
3
The Impact of Pathogens on Sepsis Prevalence and Outcome.
病原体对脓毒症患病率及预后的影响。
Pathogens. 2024 Jan 20;13(1):89. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13010089.
4
Host Response Biomarkers for Sepsis in the Emergency Room.急诊室脓毒症宿主反应生物标志物。
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 21;27(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04367-z.
5
A cytokine/PTX3 prognostic index as a predictor of mortality in sepsis.细胞因子/PTX3 预后指数预测脓毒症患者死亡率。
Front Immunol. 2022 Sep 15;13:979232. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.979232. eCollection 2022.
6
Sepsis and Its Impact on Outcomes in Elderly Patients Admitted to a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit.脓毒症及其对入住马来西亚重症监护病房老年患者预后的影响。
Malays J Med Sci. 2022 Jun;29(3):145-150. doi: 10.21315/mjms2022.29.3.14. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
7
A Novel Single Cell RNA-seq Analysis of Non-Myeloid Circulating Cells in Late Sepsis.晚期脓毒症中非髓系循环细胞的新型单细胞 RNA-seq 分析。
Front Immunol. 2021 Aug 16;12:696536. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.696536. eCollection 2021.
8
Accuracy for Mortality Prediction With Additive Biomarkers Including Interleukin-6 in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.使用包括白细胞介素-6在内的相加生物标志物预测危重症患者死亡率的准确性:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Apr 26;3(4):e0387. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000387. eCollection 2021 Apr.
9
The prediction of mortality influential variables in an intensive care unit: a case study.重症监护病房死亡率影响因素的预测:一项案例研究。
Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2023;27(2):203-219. doi: 10.1007/s00779-021-01540-5. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
10
A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis.机器学习模型与临床评估在预测脓毒症患者死亡率方面的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245157. eCollection 2021.