Health Systems and Research Ethics group. KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, P.O Box 230, 80108, Kilifi, Kenya.
Strathmore University Business School, Ole Sangale Road, Madaraka, P.O. Box 59857-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Sep 15;16(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0607-x.
In March 2013, Kenya transitioned from a centralized to a devolved system of governance. Within the health sector, this entailed the transfer of service provision functions to 47 newly formed semi-autonomous counties, while policy and regulatory functions were retained at the national level. The devolution process was rapid rather than progressive.
We conducted qualitative research within one county to examine the early experiences of devolution in the health sector. We specifically focused on the experience of change from the perspective of sub-county managers, who form the link between county level managers and health facility managers. We collected data by observing a diverse range of management meetings, support supervision visits and outreach activities involving sub-county managers between May 2013 and June 2015, conducting informal interviews wherever we could. Informal observations and interviews were supplemented by fifteen tape recorded in depth interviews with purposively selected sub-county managers from three sub-counties.
We found that sub county managers as with many other health system actors were anxious about and ill-prepared for the unexpectedly rapid devolution of health functions to the newly created county government. They experienced loss of autonomy and resources in addition to confused lines of accountability within the health system. However, they harnessed individual, team and stakeholder resources to maintain their jobs, and continued to play a central role in supporting peripheral facility managers to cope with change.
Our study illustrates the importance in accelerated devolution contexts for: 1) mid-level managers to adopt new ways of working and engagement with higher and lower levels in the system; 2) clear lines of communication during reforms to these actors and 3) anticipating and managing the effect of change on intangible software issues such as trust and motivation. More broadly, we show the value of examining organisational change from the perspective of key actors within the system, and highlight the importance in times of rapid change of drawing upon and working with those already in the system. These actors have valuable tacit knowledge, but tapping into and building on this knowledge to enable positive response in times of health system shocks requires greater attention to sustained software capacity building within the health system.
2013 年 3 月,肯尼亚从中央集权制向权力下放的治理体系过渡。在卫生部门,这意味着将服务提供职能移交给 47 个新成立的半自治县,而政策和监管职能仍保留在国家一级。权力下放进程迅速,而非逐步推进。
我们在一个县内进行了定性研究,以研究卫生部门权力下放的早期经验。我们特别关注从次县管理者的角度看待变革的经验,他们是县一级管理者与卫生机构管理者之间的联系。我们通过观察各种管理会议、支持性监督访问和涉及次县管理者的外展活动,从 2013 年 5 月至 2015 年 6 月收集数据,并在可能的情况下进行非正式访谈。非正式观察和访谈由 15 次与从三个次县中挑选的次县管理者进行的深度访谈进行补充。
我们发现,次县管理者和许多其他卫生系统参与者一样,对卫生职能出乎意料地迅速下放给新成立的县政府感到焦虑和准备不足。他们经历了自主权和资源的丧失,以及卫生系统内混乱的问责制。然而,他们利用个人、团队和利益相关者的资源来保住工作,并继续在支持周边机构管理者应对变革方面发挥核心作用。
我们的研究表明,在加速权力下放的背景下,需要注意以下几点:1)中层管理者需要采用新的工作方式,并与系统中的上下级建立联系;2)在改革过程中向这些参与者明确沟通;3)预测和管理变革对信任和激励等无形软件问题的影响。更广泛地说,我们展示了从系统内部的关键参与者的角度研究组织变革的价值,并强调在快速变革时期,利用和与已经在系统中的人员合作的重要性。这些参与者具有宝贵的隐性知识,但为了在卫生系统冲击时做出积极响应,需要更加关注卫生系统内的持续软件能力建设,以利用和建立这种知识。