Kairu Angela, Orangi Stacey, Mbuthia Boniface, Ondera Joanne, Ravishankar Nirmala, Barasa Edwine
Health Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, P.O. Box 43640, - 00100, Lenana Road, Nairobi, Kenya.
ThinkWell Kenya, P.O. Box 52201 -, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 13;21(1):1086. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07123-7.
How health facilities are financed affects their performance and health system goals. We examined how health facilities in the public sector are financed in Kenya, within the context of a devolved health system.
We carried out a cross-sectional study in five purposely selected counties in Kenya, using a mixed methods approach. We collected data using document reviews and in-depth interviews (no = 20). In each county, we interviewed county department of health managers and health facility managers from two and one purposely selected public hospitals and health center respectively. We analyzed qualitive data using thematic analysis and conducted descriptive analysis of quantitative data.
Planning and budgeting: Planning and budgeting processes by hospitals and health centers were not standardized across counties. Budgets were not transparent and credible, but rather were regarded as "wish lists" since they did not translate to actual resources. Sources of funds: Public hospitals relied on user fees, while health centers relied on donor funds as their main sources of funding. Funding flows: Hospitals in four of the five study counties had no financial autonomy. Health centers in all study counties had financial autonomy. Flow of funds to hospitals and health centers in all study counties was characterized by unpredictability of amounts and timing. Health facility expenditure: Staff salaries accounted for over 80% of health facility expenditure. This crowded out other expenditure and led to frequent stock outs of essential health commodities.
The national and county government should consider improving health facility financing in Kenya by 1) standardizing budgeting and planning processes, 2) transitioning public facility financing away from a reliance on user fees and donor funding 3) reforming public finance management laws and carry out political engagement to facilitate direct facility financing and financial autonomy of public hospitals, and 4) assess health facility resource needs to guide appropriate levels resource allocation.
卫生设施的筹资方式会影响其绩效以及卫生系统目标。我们在卫生系统权力下放的背景下,研究了肯尼亚公共部门的卫生设施是如何筹资的。
我们在肯尼亚特意挑选的五个县开展了一项横断面研究,采用混合方法。我们通过文件审查和深入访谈(共20次)收集数据。在每个县,我们分别采访了县卫生部管理人员以及特意挑选的两家公立医院和一家卫生中心的卫生设施管理人员。我们采用主题分析法分析定性数据,并对定量数据进行描述性分析。
规划与预算:各医院和卫生中心的规划与预算流程在各县之间并不统一。预算不透明且不可信,而是被视为“愿望清单”,因为它们并未转化为实际资源。资金来源:公立医院依赖使用者付费,而卫生中心则依赖捐助资金作为主要资金来源。资金流动:五个研究县中的四个县的医院没有财务自主权。所有研究县的卫生中心都有财务自主权。所有研究县流向医院和卫生中心的资金在金额和时间上都具有不可预测性。卫生设施支出:工作人员工资占卫生设施支出的80%以上。这排挤了其他支出,导致基本卫生用品经常缺货。
国家和县政府应考虑通过以下方式改善肯尼亚的卫生设施筹资:1)规范预算编制和规划流程;2)使公共设施筹资从依赖使用者付费和捐助资金转向其他方式;3)改革公共财政管理法律,并开展政治参与以促进公立医院的直接设施筹资和财务自主权;4)评估卫生设施资源需求,以指导适当的资源分配水平。