Pyner Alison, Nyambe-Silavwe Hilda, Williamson Gary
School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds , Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, Yorkshire LS2 9JT, U.K.
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Oct 4;65(39):8643-8651. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03678. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
We optimized the assays used to measure inhibition of rat and human α-glucosidases (sucrase and maltase activities), intestinal enzymes which catalyze the final steps of carbohydrate digestion. Cell-free extracts from fully differentiated intestinal Caco-2/TC7 monolayers were shown to be a suitable source of sucrase-isomaltase, with the same sequence as human small intestine, and were compared to a rat intestinal extract. The kinetic conditions of the assay were optimized, including comparison of enzymatic and chromatographic methods to detect the monosaccharide products. Human sucrase activity was more susceptible than the rat enzyme to inhibition by acarbose (IC (concentration required for 50% inhibition) = 2.5 ± 0.5 and 12.3 ± 0.6 μM, respectively), by a polyphenol-rich green tea extract, and by pure (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) (IC = 657 ± 150 and 950 ± 86 μM respectively). In contrast, the reverse was observed when assessing maltase activity (e.g.
, EGCG: IC = 677 ± 241 and 14.0 ± 2.0 μM for human and rat maltase, respectively). 5-Caffeoylquinic acid did not significantly inhibit maltase and was only a very weak inhibitor of sucrase. The data show that for sucrase and maltase activities, inhibition patterns of rat and human enzymes are generally qualitatively similar but can be quantitatively different.
我们优化了用于测量大鼠和人类α-葡萄糖苷酶(蔗糖酶和麦芽糖酶活性)抑制作用的检测方法,这两种酶是催化碳水化合物消化最后步骤的肠道酶。已证明完全分化的肠道Caco-2/TC7单层细胞的无细胞提取物是蔗糖酶-异麦芽糖酶的合适来源,其序列与人类小肠相同,并与大鼠肠道提取物进行了比较。优化了检测的动力学条件,包括比较酶法和色谱法以检测单糖产物。人类蔗糖酶活性比大鼠酶更容易受到阿卡波糖(50%抑制所需浓度分别为2.5±0.5和12.3±0.6μM)、富含多酚的绿茶提取物以及纯(-)-表没食子儿茶素-3-没食子酸酯(EGCG)(IC分别为657±150和950±86μM)的抑制。相反,在评估麦芽糖酶活性时观察到相反的情况(例如,EGCG:人类和大鼠麦芽糖酶的IC分别为677±241和14.0±2.0μM)。5-咖啡酰奎尼酸对麦芽糖酶没有显著抑制作用,对蔗糖酶只是一种非常弱的抑制剂。数据表明,对于蔗糖酶和麦芽糖酶活性,大鼠和人类酶的抑制模式在定性上通常相似,但在定量上可能不同。