Akamatsu Shigeru, Kondo Yuji, Dohi Shuji
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Gifu University School of Medicine, 40 Tsukasa-machi, 500, Gifu Gifu, Japan.
Aloka Co. Ltd., 3-7-19 Imai, Ohme, 198, Tokyo, Japan.
J Anesth. 1996 Jun;10(2):133-139. doi: 10.1007/BF02483350.
Blood flow velocity measured by Doppler ultrasound is the relative velocity dependent on the path of the ultrasound beam, which should be influenced by its angle of incidence against the blood flow in the vessel. The angle of incidence generates varying changes in flow velocities that can be measured by the Doppler device. The aim of our study was to develop a new ultrasonic Doppler catheter which could provide a true flow velocity independently of the angle of the ultrasound beam against the flow direction, and to assess the validity of the true flow velocity obtained by a new device using the electromagnetic flowmeter. The newly developed Doppler catheter has a pair of adjoining ultrasonic crystals located on one side of the catheter at right angles to each other. Each Doppler shift, which is detected by two transducers (Δf1, Δf2) that sample the flow velocity at two closely spaced points, is used to compute two velocity measurements (V and V); these are the velocities detected by the transducers. The true velocity was calculated using the following equation: V=((V)+(V)), where V = true velocity. The velocities were calculated by newly developed phase differential techniques. Using a continuous flow model, we compared the flow velocity measured by the new Doppler catheter with that assessed by an electromagnetic flow probe placed into the circuit. At between 0.42 and 4.49 l·min, the flow velocity measured by the new Doppler catheter (Doppler velocity) at five sampling depths was compared with the mean velocity calculated from the volumetric flow rate measured by an electromagnetic flowmeter (EMF velocity). The Doppler velocity (y) strongly correlated with the EMF velocity (x) at five sampling depths (r =0.99, respectively). At the maximal velocity sampling depth, the regression equation was y=1.29x+2.47 (r =0.99,P<0.0001,n=41, SEE=0.015). The Doppler velocity also correlated with the volumetric flow rate measured by the electromagnetic flowmeter (r =0.99). The flow velocity measurements using the new Doppler catheter and device we have developed can provide more instantaneous and useful information on hemodynamics.
通过多普勒超声测量的血流速度是取决于超声束路径的相对速度,其应受超声束与血管内血流入射角的影响。入射角会使血流速度产生不同变化,这些变化可由多普勒设备测量。我们研究的目的是开发一种新型超声多普勒导管,其能够独立于超声束与血流方向的角度提供真实的血流速度,并使用电磁流量计评估新设备获得的真实血流速度的有效性。新开发的多普勒导管在导管一侧有一对相邻的超声晶体,它们相互成直角。由两个在紧密间隔的点对流速进行采样的换能器检测到的每个多普勒频移(Δf1、Δf2),用于计算两个速度测量值(V和V);这些是换能器检测到的速度。真实速度使用以下公式计算:V = ((V)+(V)),其中V = 真实速度。速度通过新开发的相位差分技术计算得出。使用连续流模型,我们将新多普勒导管测量的血流速度与置于回路中的电磁流量探头评估的血流速度进行了比较。在0.42至4.49 l·min之间,将新多普勒导管在五个采样深度测量的血流速度(多普勒速度)与由电磁流量计测量的体积流量计算出的平均速度(EMF速度)进行了比较。在五个采样深度,多普勒速度(y)与EMF速度(x)高度相关(r分别为0.99)。在最大速度采样深度,回归方程为y = 1.29x + 2.47(r = 0.99,P < 0.0001,n = 41,SEE = 0.015)。多普勒速度也与电磁流量计测量的体积流量相关(r = 0.99)。使用我们开发的新多普勒导管和设备进行的血流速度测量可以提供更多关于血流动力学的即时有用信息。