Roach Michael, Sauermann Henry
Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
ESMT European School of Management and Technology, Berlin, Germany.
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 18;12(9):e0184130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184130. eCollection 2017.
There is increasing evidence that science & engineering PhD students lose interest in an academic career over the course of graduate training. It is not clear, however, whether this decline reflects students being discouraged from pursuing an academic career by the challenges of obtaining a faculty job or whether it reflects more fundamental changes in students' career goals for reasons other than the academic labor market. We examine this question using a longitudinal survey that follows a cohort of PhD students from 39 U.S. research universities over the course of graduate training to document changes in career preferences and to explore potential drivers of such changes. We report two main results. First, although the vast majority of students start the PhD interested in an academic research career, over time 55% of all students remain interested while 25% lose interest entirely. In addition, 15% of all students were never interested in an academic career during their PhD program, while 5% become more interested. Thus, the declining interest in an academic career is not a general phenomenon across all PhD students, but rather reflects a divergence between those students who remain highly interested in an academic career and other students who are no longer interested in one. Second, we show that the decline we observe is not driven by expectations of academic job availability, nor by related factors such as postdoctoral requirements or the availability of research funding. Instead, the decline appears partly due to the misalignment between students' changing preferences for specific job attributes on the one hand, and the nature of the academic research career itself on the other. Changes in students' perceptions of their own research ability also play a role, while publications do not. We discuss implications for scientific labor markets, PhD career development programs, and science policy.
越来越多的证据表明,理工科博士生在研究生培养过程中对学术职业失去兴趣。然而,尚不清楚这种兴趣下降是因为获得教职工作的挑战使学生们对从事学术职业感到气馁,还是因为除学术劳动力市场之外的其他原因导致学生职业目标发生了更根本的变化。我们通过一项纵向调查来研究这个问题,该调查跟踪了来自美国39所研究型大学的一批博士生在研究生培养过程中的情况,以记录职业偏好的变化并探索此类变化的潜在驱动因素。我们报告了两个主要结果。首先,尽管绝大多数学生开始攻读博士学位时对学术研究职业感兴趣,但随着时间的推移,所有学生中有55%仍然感兴趣,而25%则完全失去兴趣。此外,所有学生中有15%在博士课程期间从未对学术职业感兴趣,而5%则变得更感兴趣。因此,对学术职业兴趣的下降并非所有博士生的普遍现象,而是反映了那些对学术职业仍保持高度兴趣的学生与其他不再对学术职业感兴趣的学生之间的差异。其次,我们表明,我们观察到的兴趣下降并非由对学术工作可得性的预期驱动,也不是由博士后要求或研究资金可得性等相关因素驱动。相反,兴趣下降似乎部分是由于一方面学生对特定工作属性的偏好不断变化,另一方面学术研究职业本身的性质之间存在错位。学生对自己研究能力认知的变化也起到了作用,而发表论文则没有。我们讨论了对科学劳动力市场、博士职业发展项目和科学政策的影响。