Suppr超能文献

预防和/或治疗谵妄干预措施有效性试验核心结局集的制定(Del-COrS):研究方案

Development of core outcome sets for effectiveness trials of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium (Del-COrS): study protocol.

作者信息

Rose Louise, Agar Meera, Burry Lisa D, Campbell Noll, Clarke Mike, Lee Jacques, Siddiqi Najma, Page Valerie J

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 18;7(9):e016371. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016371.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Delirium is a common, serious and potentially preventable condition with devastating impact on the quality of life prompting a proliferation of interventional trials. Core outcome sets aim to standardise outcome reporting by identifying outcomes perceived fundamental for measurement in trials of a specific interest area. Our aim is to develop international consensus on two core outcome sets for trials of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium, irrespective of study population. We aim to identify additional core outcomes specific to the critically ill, acutely hospitalised patients, palliative care and older adults.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a systematic review of published and ongoing delirium trials (1980 onwards) and one-on-one interviews of patients who have experienced delirium and family members. These data will inform Delphi round 1 of a two-stage consensus process. In round 2, we will provide participants their own response, summarised group responses and those of patient/family participants for rescoring. We will randomise participants to receive feedback as proportion scoring the outcome as critical or as group mean responses. We will hold a consensus meeting using nominal group technique to finalise outcomes for inclusion. We will repeat the Delphi process and consensus meeting to select measures for each core outcome. We will recruit 240 Delphi participants giving us 80% power to detect a 1.0-1.5 point (9-point scale) difference by feedback method between rounds. We will analyse differences for subsequent scores, magnitude of opinion change, items retained and level of agreement.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

We are obtaining research ethics approvals according to local governance. Participation will be voluntary and data deidentified. Support from three international delirium organisations will be instrumental in dissemination and core outcome set uptake. We will disseminate through peer-reviewed open access publications and present at conferences selected to reach a wide range of knowledge users.

摘要

引言

谵妄是一种常见、严重且可能预防的病症,对生活质量具有毁灭性影响,这促使了干预试验的大量涌现。核心结局集旨在通过确定在特定感兴趣领域的试验中被视为测量基础的结局,来规范结局报告。我们的目标是就预防和/或治疗谵妄的干预试验的两个核心结局集达成国际共识,无论研究人群如何。我们旨在确定针对危重症患者、急性住院患者、姑息治疗患者和老年人的额外核心结局。

方法与分析

我们将对已发表和正在进行的谵妄试验(1980年起)进行系统综述,并对经历过谵妄的患者及其家属进行一对一访谈。这些数据将为两阶段共识过程的第一轮德尔菲法提供信息。在第二轮中,我们将向参与者提供他们自己的回答、汇总的小组回答以及患者/家属参与者的回答以供重新评分。我们将随机分配参与者,使其收到作为关键结局评分的比例或小组平均回答的反馈。我们将使用名义群体技术召开共识会议,以最终确定纳入的结局。我们将重复德尔菲法过程和共识会议,以选择每个核心结局的测量指标。我们将招募240名德尔菲法参与者,使我们有80%的把握检测出两轮之间反馈方法导致的1.0 - 1.5分(9分制)差异。我们将分析后续评分的差异、意见变化的幅度、保留的项目以及一致程度。

伦理与传播

我们正在根据当地管理规定获得研究伦理批准。参与将是自愿的,数据将进行去识别化处理。来自三个国际谵妄组织的支持将有助于传播和采用核心结局集。我们将通过同行评审的开放获取出版物进行传播,并在选定的会议上展示,以覆盖广泛的知识使用者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3924/5623471/bc18dbfc5963/bmjopen-2017-016371f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验