1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
2 Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Jan;15(1):69-75. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201705-392OC.
Lung cancer screening has a mortality benefit to high-risk smokers, but implementation remains suboptimal. Providers represent the key entry point to screening, and an understanding of provider perspectives on lung cancer screening is necessary to improve referral and overall implementation.
The objective of this study was to understand knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, barriers, and facilitators to screening in a diverse group of referring pulmonologists and primary care providers.
We conducted an electronic survey of primary care and pulmonary providers within a tertiary care medical center across different practice sites. The survey covered the following domains: 1) beliefs and assessment of evidence, 2) knowledge of lung cancer screening and guidelines, 3) current screening practices, 4) barriers and facilitators, and 5) demographic and practice characteristics.
The 196 participants included 80% primary care clinicians and 19% pulmonologists (1% others). Forty-one percent practiced at university-based or affiliated clinics, 47% at county hospital-based clinics, and 12% at other or unidentified sites. The majority endorsed lung cancer screening effectiveness (74%); however, performance on knowledge-based assessments of screening eligibility, documentation, and nodule management was suboptimal. Key barriers included inadequate time (36%), inadequate staffing (36%), and patients having too many other illnesses to address screening (38%). Decision aids, which are used at the point of referral, were commonly identified both as important lung cancer screening clinical facilitators (51%) and as provider knowledge facilitators (59%). There were several differences by provider specialty, including primary care providers more frequently reporting time constraints and their patients having too many other illnesses to address screening as significant barriers to lung cancer screening.
Providers endorsed the benefits of lung cancer screening, but there are limitations in provider knowledge of key screening components. The most frequently reported barriers to screening represent a lack of clinical time or resources to address lung cancer screening in clinical practice. Facilitators for nodule management as well as point-of-care referral materials may be helpful in reducing knowledge gaps and the clinical burden of referral. These are all modifiable factors, which could be addressed to increase screening referral. Differences in attitudes and barriers by specialty should also be considered to optimize screening implementation.
肺癌筛查对高危吸烟者有降低死亡率的效果,但目前的实施情况仍不理想。医务人员是进行筛查的关键切入点,了解医务人员对肺癌筛查的看法有助于提高转诊率和整体实施效果。
本研究旨在了解不同类型的呼吸科医生和初级保健医生对肺癌筛查的认知、信念、态度、障碍和促进因素。
我们对一家三级医疗中心内不同医疗场所的初级保健医生和呼吸科医生进行了一项电子问卷调查。调查涵盖以下领域:1)对证据的信念和评估;2)对肺癌筛查和指南的了解;3)目前的筛查实践;4)障碍和促进因素;5)人口统计学和实践特征。
196 名参与者中,80%为初级保健临床医生,19%为呼吸科医生(1%为其他科室)。41%的人在大学附属或合作诊所工作,47%在县立医院附属诊所工作,12%在其他或未确定的地点工作。大多数人认可肺癌筛查的有效性(74%);然而,在基于知识的筛查资格、记录和结节管理评估方面的表现并不理想。主要障碍包括时间不足(36%)、人员配备不足(36%)和患者有太多其他疾病需要处理而无法进行筛查(38%)。决策辅助工具在转诊时经常被认为是重要的肺癌筛查临床促进因素(51%)和提供者知识促进因素(59%)。不同专业的医生之间存在一些差异,包括初级保健医生更频繁地报告时间限制,以及他们的患者有太多其他疾病需要处理而无法进行肺癌筛查,这是肺癌筛查的重要障碍。
医务人员认可肺癌筛查的益处,但对关键筛查内容的了解有限。报告的筛查障碍主要是缺乏临床时间或资源来处理临床实践中的肺癌筛查。有助于管理结节的工具以及床边转诊材料可能有助于减少知识差距和转诊的临床负担。这些都是可以改变的因素,可以通过这些措施来增加筛查转诊。还应考虑专业差异导致的态度和障碍,以优化筛查实施。