Venter Marietjie, Treurnicht Florette K, Buys Amelia, Tempia Stefano, Samudzi Rudo, McAnerney Johanna, Jacobs Charlene A, Thomas Juno, Blumberg Lucille
Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis.
Centre for Viral Zoonoses, Department Medical Virology, University of Pretoria.
J Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 15;216(suppl_4):S512-S519. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix018.
Risk factors for human infection with highly pathogenic (HP) and low-pathogenic (LP) avian influenza (AI) H5N2 and H7N1 were investigated during outbreaks in ostriches in the Western Cape province, South Africa.
Serum surveys were conducted for veterinarians, farmworkers, and laboratory and abattoir workers involved in 2 AI outbreaks in the Western Cape province: (1) controlling and culling of 42000 ostriches during (HPAI)H5N2 outbreaks in ostriches (2011) (n = 207); (2) movement control during (LPAI)H7N1 outbreaks in 2012 (n = 66). A third serosurvey was conducted on state veterinarians from across the country in 2012 tasked with disease control in general (n = 37). Antibodies to H5 and H7 were measured by means of hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization assays, with microneutralization assay titers >40 considered positive.
Two of 207 (1%) participants were seropositive for H5 and 4 of 207 (2%) for H7 in 2011, compared with 1 of 66 (1.5%) and 8 of 66 (13%) in 2012. Although individuals in all professions tested seropositive, abattoir workers (10 of 97; 10.3%) were significantly more at risk of influenza A(H7N1) infection (P = .001) than those in other professions (2 of 171;1.2%). Among state veterinarians, 4 of 37(11%) were seropositive for H7 and 1 of 37 (2.7%) for H5. Investigations of (LP)H7N1-associated fatalities in wild birds and quarantined exotic birds in Gauteng, AI outbreaks in poultry in KwaZulu-Natal, and ostriches in Western Cape province provide possible exposure events.
(LPAI)H7N1 strains pose a greater infection-risk than (HPAI)H5N2 strains to persons involved in control of outbreaks in infected birds, with ostrich abattoir workers at highest risk.
在南非西开普省鸵鸟禽流感疫情爆发期间,对人类感染高致病性(HP)和低致病性(LP)禽流感(AI)H5N2和H7N1的风险因素进行了调查。
对参与西开普省两起禽流感疫情的兽医、农场工人以及实验室和屠宰场工人进行了血清学调查:(1)在2011年鸵鸟高致病性禽流感(HPAI)H5N2疫情期间对42000只鸵鸟进行控制和扑杀(n = 207);(2)在2012年低致病性禽流感(LPAI)H7N1疫情期间进行流动控制(n = 66)。2012年对来自全国各地负责一般疾病控制的国家兽医进行了第三次血清学调查(n = 37)。通过血凝抑制试验和微量中和试验检测H5和H7抗体,微量中和试验滴度>40被视为阳性。
2011年,207名参与者中有2人(1%)H5血清学阳性,4人(2%)H7血清学阳性;2012年,66名参与者中有1人(1.5%)H5血清学阳性,8人(13%)H7血清学阳性。尽管所有职业的个体检测均有血清学阳性,但屠宰场工人(97人中有10人;10.3%)感染甲型流感(H7N1)的风险显著高于其他职业的人(171人中有2人;1.2%)(P = 0.001)。在国家兽医中,37人中有4人(11%)H7血清学阳性,37人中有1人(2.7%)H5血清学阳性。对豪登省野生鸟类和隔离外来鸟类中与低致病性(LP)H7N1相关的死亡病例、夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔省家禽禽流感疫情以及西开普省鸵鸟疫情的调查提供了可能的暴露事件。
对于参与感染禽类疫情控制的人员,低致病性禽流感(LPAI)H7N1毒株比高致病性禽流感(HPAI)H5N2毒株带来的感染风险更大,鸵鸟屠宰场工人风险最高。