Cairney Scott A, Sobczak Justyna M, Lindsay Shane, Gaskell M Gareth
Department of Psychology, University of York, United Kingdom.
Psychology, School of Life Sciences, University of Hull, United Kingdom.
Sleep. 2017 Sep 1;40(9). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsx114.
Memories are strengthened during sleep. The benefits of sleep for memory can be enhanced by re-exposing the sleeping brain to auditory cues; a technique known as targeted memory reactivation (TMR). Prior studies have not assessed the nature of the retrieval mechanisms underpinning TMR: the matching process between auditory stimuli encountered during sleep and previously encoded memories. We carried out two experiments to address this issue.
In Experiment 1, participants associated words with verbal and nonverbal auditory stimuli before an overnight interval in which subsets of these stimuli were replayed in slow-wave sleep. We repeated this paradigm in Experiment 2 with the single difference that the gender of the verbal auditory stimuli was switched between learning and sleep.
In Experiment 1, forgetting of cued (vs. noncued) associations was reduced by TMR with verbal and nonverbal cues to similar extents. In Experiment 2, TMR with identical nonverbal cues reduced forgetting of cued (vs. noncued) associations, replicating Experiment 1. However, TMR with nonidentical verbal cues reduced forgetting of both cued and noncued associations.
These experiments suggest that the memory effects of TMR are influenced by the acoustic overlap between stimuli delivered at training and sleep. Our findings hint at the existence of two processing routes for memory retrieval during sleep. Whereas TMR with acoustically identical cues may reactivate individual associations via simple episodic matching, TMR with nonidentical verbal cues may utilize linguistic decoding mechanisms, resulting in widespread reactivation across a broad category of memories.
记忆在睡眠期间得到巩固。通过让睡眠中的大脑再次接触听觉线索,可以增强睡眠对记忆的益处;这种技术被称为靶向记忆再激活(TMR)。先前的研究尚未评估支撑TMR的检索机制的本质:睡眠期间遇到的听觉刺激与先前编码的记忆之间的匹配过程。我们进行了两项实验来解决这个问题。
在实验1中,参与者在经过一夜的间隔之前,将单词与言语和非言语听觉刺激联系起来,在这个间隔期间,这些刺激的子集在慢波睡眠中被重放。我们在实验2中重复了这个范式,唯一的区别是言语听觉刺激的性别在学习和睡眠之间进行了切换。
在实验1中,TMR使用言语和非言语线索在相似程度上减少了线索(相对于无线索)联想的遗忘。在实验2中,使用相同非言语线索的TMR减少了线索(相对于无线索)联想的遗忘,重复了实验1的结果。然而,使用不同言语线索的TMR减少了线索和无线索联想的遗忘。
这些实验表明,TMR的记忆效应受到训练和睡眠期间呈现的刺激之间的声学重叠的影响。我们的研究结果暗示了睡眠期间记忆检索存在两种处理途径。虽然使用声学相同线索的TMR可能通过简单的情景匹配重新激活个体联想,但使用不同言语线索的TMR可能利用语言解码机制,导致广泛类别记忆的普遍重新激活。