1 Division of Palliative Care, Department of Anesthesia, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
2 Department of Pediatrics, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute , Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(3):290-296. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0333. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
Children receiving hospice and palliative care (HPC) differ from adults in important ways. Children are more likely to have rare diagnoses, less likely to have cancer, have longer lengths of stay on hospice, and are more likely to be technology dependent than adults. The National Consensus Project (NCP) in Palliative Care established domains of quality for HPC, but these domains have not been evaluated for applicability in children.
This study aims to establish consensus stakeholder-prioritized domains of high-quality pediatric home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC).
Mixed methods design.
SETTING/SUBJECTS: Providers from the Ohio Pediatric Palliative Care and End-of-life Network.
Using a modified Delphi technique, providers were surveyed regarding the NCP quality domains for HPC.
There was strong consensus on the applicability of each domain to the participants' practices (median scores ranged from 0.97 to 1.0 with interquartile ranges = 0). Consensus on the rank importance of the eight domains was not achieved. Qualitative data included challenges with NCP domain 3 (Psychological and Psychiatric Aspects of Care). It was recommended that titles should remain consistent with adult standards, but domain definitions should be broadened for pediatric HBHPC. Continuity and coordination of care should be added as a ninth domain of quality in pediatric HBHPC.
All eight NCP domains were validated in pediatric HBHPC. A ninth domain, Continuity and Coordination of Care, was also added. Ranking the domains was not recommended as consensus indicated weighting them as equally integrated standards. Future studies are needed to evaluate parent- and patient-prioritized domains of quality in pediatric HBHPC and to validate and map pediatric-specific indicators to these domains.
接受临终关怀和姑息治疗(HPC)的儿童与成人在许多重要方面存在差异。儿童更有可能被诊断出罕见疾病,癌症的可能性较小,在临终关怀机构的停留时间更长,比成人更依赖技术。国家姑息治疗共识项目(NCP)确定了 HPC 的质量领域,但这些领域尚未评估其在儿童中的适用性。
本研究旨在确定共识利益相关者优先考虑的高质量儿科家庭临终关怀和姑息治疗(HBHPC)领域。
混合方法设计。
设置/研究对象:俄亥俄州儿科姑息治疗和临终关怀网络的提供者。
使用改良 Delphi 技术,对提供者进行了关于 HPC 的 NCP 质量领域的调查。
各领域对参与者实践的适用性得到了强烈共识(中位数评分为 0.97-1.0,四分位距为 0)。对于八个领域的重要性排名,共识没有达成。定性数据包括 NCP 领域 3(心理和精神方面的护理)存在挑战。建议保留与成人标准一致的标题,但应扩大儿科 HBHPC 的领域定义。连续性和协调护理应作为儿科 HBHPC 的第九个质量领域添加。
NCP 的所有八个领域都在儿科 HBHPC 中得到了验证。还添加了第九个领域,即连续性和协调护理。不建议对这些领域进行排名,因为共识表明将它们作为同等综合标准加权。需要进一步研究来评估儿科 HBHPC 中父母和患者优先考虑的质量领域,并验证和映射儿科特定指标到这些领域。