Finnish Environment Institute, Laboratory Centre, Hakuninmaantie 6, 00430, Helsinki, Finland; Aalto University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tietotie 1E, 02150, Espoo, Finland.
UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research GmbH, Leipzig, Germany; Institute for Environmental Research (Biology V), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Water Res. 2017 Dec 1;126:153-163. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
Wastewaters contain complex mixtures of chemicals, which can cause adverse toxic effects in the receiving environment. In the present study, the toxicity removal during wastewater treatment at seven municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) was investigated using an effect-based approach. A battery of eight bioassays was applied comprising of cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, endocrine disruption and fish embryo toxicity assays. Human cell-based CALUX assays, transgenic larval models and the fish embryo toxicity test were particularly sensitive to WWTP effluents. The results indicate that most effects were significantly reduced or completely removed during wastewater treatment (76-100%), while embryo toxicity, estrogenic activity and thyroid disruption were still detectable in the effluents suggesting that some harmful substances remain after treatment. The responsiveness of the bioassays was compared and the human cell-based CALUX assays showed highest responsiveness in the samples. Additionally, the fish embryo toxicity test and the transgenic larval models for endocrine disrupting effects showed high responsiveness at low sample concentrations in nearly all of the effluent samples. The results showed a similar effect pattern among all WWTPs investigated, indicating that the wastewater composition could be rather similar at different locations. There were no considerable differences in the toxicity removal efficiencies of the treatment plants and no correlation was observed with WWTP characteristics, such as process configuration or sludge age. This study demonstrated that a biotest battery comprising of multiple endpoints can serve as a powerful tool when assessing water quality or water treatment efficiency in a holistic manner. Rather than analyzing the concentrations of a few selected chemicals, bioassays can be used to complement traditional methods of monitoring in the future by assessing sum-parameter based effects, such as mixture effects, and tackling chemicals that are present at concentrations below chemical analytical detection limits.
废水中含有复杂的化学物质混合物,这些物质会对受纳环境造成不良的毒性影响。在本研究中,采用基于效应的方法研究了 7 个城市污水处理厂(WWTP)在处理废水过程中的毒性去除情况。应用了一系列 8 种生物测定法,包括细胞毒性、遗传毒性、内分泌干扰和鱼类胚胎毒性测定法。基于人细胞的 CALUX 测定法、转基因幼虫模型和鱼类胚胎毒性测试对 WWTP 废水特别敏感。结果表明,大多数效应在废水处理过程中显著降低或完全去除(76%-100%),而胚胎毒性、雌激素活性和甲状腺干扰仍可在废水中检测到,表明处理后仍存在一些有害物质。比较了生物测定法的反应性,基于人细胞的 CALUX 测定法在样品中表现出最高的反应性。此外,鱼类胚胎毒性测试和用于内分泌干扰效应的转基因幼虫模型在几乎所有废水样品的低浓度下均表现出高反应性。结果表明,所有研究的 WWTP 之间存在相似的效应模式,表明不同地点的废水组成可能相当相似。处理厂的毒性去除效率没有显著差异,与 WWTP 特征(如工艺配置或污泥龄)之间也没有观察到相关性。本研究表明,包含多个终点的生物测试组合可以作为一种强大的工具,用于全面评估水质或水处理效率。生物测定法可以通过评估基于总和参数的效应(如混合物效应)和处理低于化学分析检测限浓度的化学物质来补充传统的监测方法,而不是分析少数选定化学物质的浓度。