Suppr超能文献

镰状细胞病患者的视网膜微循环成像。

Retinal microcirculation imaging in sickle cell disease patients.

机构信息

Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States.

出版信息

Microvasc Res. 2018 Mar;116:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the feasibility of a new quantitative method for microvascular function: non-invasive retinal function imaging (RFI). in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients and healthy controls and have it benchmarked against Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) measurements.

METHODS

The variability of Microvascular measurements was assessed in 8 SCD patients and 8 healthy matched controls. Measurements were conducted twice on two different study days. RFI was performed for assessment of arterial and venous retinal blood flow. LSCI measurements included post occlusive reactive hyperemia and IBH challenges. Measured variables included basal flow, flow upon occlusion-reperfusion and flow during an IBH.

RESULTS

RFI arterial flow and venous flow and LSCI basal flow and peak flow showed excellent intra subject repeatability between days (CVC of 8.5% 9.5%, 7.6% and 7.7% respectively) and between measurements on one day (CVC of 7.0%, 7.7%, 7.6% and 4.7% respectively). RFI arterial flow (p<0.002), and RFI venous flow (p=0.007) differed significantly between SCD patients and controls in as did LSCI basal flow, maximal flow and delta flow during IBH (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

RFI showed low variability for all readout measures, comparable with most microvascular measures from LSCI. The discriminating power of the RFI between SCD patients and controls demonstrate the feasibility of this device for quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in clinical research.

摘要

目的

探索一种新的微血管功能定量方法——无创视网膜功能成像(RFI)在镰状细胞病(SCD)患者和健康对照者中的可行性,并将其与激光散斑对比成像(LSCI)测量结果进行对比。

方法

在 8 名 SCD 患者和 8 名健康匹配对照者中评估微血管测量的变异性。在两个不同的研究日进行两次测量。RFI 用于评估动脉和静脉视网膜血流。LSCI 测量包括后闭塞反应性充血和 IBH 挑战。测量的变量包括基础流量、闭塞再灌注时的流量和 IBH 期间的流量。

结果

RFI 动脉血流和静脉血流以及 LSCI 基础流量和峰值流量在两天之间(CVC 分别为 8.5%、9.5%、7.6%和 7.7%)和一天内的两次测量之间(CVC 分别为 7.0%、7.7%、7.6%和 4.7%)均表现出良好的个体内重复性。RFI 动脉血流(p<0.002)和 RFI 静脉血流(p=0.007)在 SCD 患者和对照组之间存在显著差异,LSCI 的基础流量、最大流量和 IBH 期间的流量差异也具有统计学意义(p<0.0001)。

结论

RFI 对所有读数测量均显示出低变异性,与 LSCI 的大多数微血管测量相当。RFI 在 SCD 患者和对照组之间的区分能力证明了该设备用于临床研究中定量评估微循环的可行性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验