Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, No.8 Jiangwangmiao Street, Nanjing, 210042, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Nov;24(33):26111-26119. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0150-8. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
To evaluate passenger health risks associated with inhalation exposure to carbonyl compounds mainly emitted from decoration materials of vehicles, we tested the carbonyl concentrations in interior air of 20 family cars, 6 metro lines, and 5 buses in the city of Nanjing. To assess non-carcinogenic health risks, we compared the data to the health guidelines of China, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), respectively. To assess carcinogenic risks, we followed a standard approach proposed by the OEHHA to calculate lifetime cancer risks (LCR) of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde for various age groups. The results showed that there are formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein concentrations in 40, 35, and 50% of family car samples exceeded the reference concentrations (RfCs) provided by Chinese guidelines (GB/T 27630-2011 and GB/T 18883-2002). Whereas, in the tested public transports, concentrations of the three carbonyls were all below the Chinese RfCs. Fifty and 90% of family cars had formaldehyde and acrolein concentrations exceeding the guidelines of OEHHA. Only one public transport sample (one bus) possesses formaldehyde and acetaldehyde concentrations above the chronic inhalation reference exposure limits (RELs). Furthermore, the assessments of carcinogenic risk of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde showed that lifetime cancer risks were higher than the limits of EPA for some family cars and public transports. In the study, buses and metros appear to be relatively clean environments, with total carbonyl concentrations that do not exceed 126 μg/m. In family cars, carbonyl levels showed significant variations from 6.1 to 811 μg/m that was greatly influenced by direct emissions from materials inside the vehicles. Public transports seemed to be the first choice for resident trips as compared to family cars. Graphical abstract ᅟ.
为了评估与车辆装饰材料主要排放的羰基化合物吸入暴露相关的乘客健康风险,我们测试了南京市 20 辆家庭汽车、6 条地铁线路和 5 辆公共汽车内部空气的羰基浓度。为了评估非致癌健康风险,我们将数据分别与中国、美国环保署(EPA)和环境健康危害评估办公室(OEHHA)的健康指南进行了比较。为了评估致癌风险,我们遵循 OEHHA 提出的标准方法,计算了不同年龄组甲醛和乙醛的终生癌症风险(LCR)。结果表明,在 40%、35%和 50%的家庭车样本中存在甲醛、乙醛和丙烯醛浓度超过中国指南(GB/T 27630-2011 和 GB/T 18883-2002)提供的参考浓度(RfC)。然而,在测试的公共交通工具中,这三种羰基化合物的浓度均低于中国 RfC。50%和 90%的家庭车的甲醛和丙烯醛浓度超过了 OEHHA 指南。只有一辆公共汽车样本(一辆公共汽车)的甲醛和乙醛浓度超过了慢性吸入参考暴露限值(REL)。此外,甲醛和乙醛致癌风险的评估表明,一些家庭车和公共交通工具的终生癌症风险高于 EPA 的限值。在这项研究中,公共汽车和地铁似乎是相对清洁的环境,总羰基浓度不超过 126μg/m。在家庭汽车中,羰基水平从 6.1 到 811μg/m 差异显著,这主要受到车内材料直接排放的影响。与家庭汽车相比,公共交通工具似乎是居民出行的首选。ᅟ