Executive Office, The INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Headquarters, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2017 May;145(5):611-622. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_139_17.
In India, research prioritization in Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health and Nutrition (MNCHN) themes has traditionally involved only a handful of experts mostly from major cities. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-INCLEN collaboration undertook a nationwide exercise engaging faculty from 256 institutions to identify top research priorities in the MNCHN themes for 2016-2025. The Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative method of priority setting was adapted. The context of the exercise was defined by a National Steering Group (NSG) and guided by four Thematic Research Subcommittees. Research ideas were pooled from 498 experts located in different parts of India, iteratively consolidated into research options, scored by 893 experts against five pre-defined criteria (answerability, relevance, equity, investment and innovation) and weighed by a larger reference group. Ranked lists of priorities were generated for each of the four themes at national and three subnational (regional) levels [Empowered Action Group & North-Eastern States, Southern and Western States, & Northern States (including West Bengal)]. Research priorities differed between regions and from overall national priorities. Delivery domain of research which included implementation research constituted about 70 per cent of the top ten research options under all four themes. The results were endorsed in the NSG meeting. There was unanimity that the research priorities should be considered by different governmental and non-governmental agencies for investment with prioritization on implementation research and issues cutting across themes.
在印度,孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康与营养(MNCHN)主题的研究优先事项传统上只涉及少数主要来自大城市的专家。印度医学研究理事会(ICMR)-INCLEN 合作开展了一项全国性的活动,让来自 256 个机构的教师参与进来,确定 2016-2025 年 MNCHN 主题的顶级研究优先事项。采用了儿童健康与营养研究倡议的优先事项设定方法。该活动的背景由国家指导小组(NSG)定义,并由四个专题研究小组委员会指导。研究思路来自印度各地的 498 位专家,通过迭代将研究方案整合在一起,由 893 位专家根据五个预先定义的标准(可回答性、相关性、公平性、投资和创新性)对这些方案进行评分,并由一个更大的参考小组进行加权。为四个主题中的每一个主题以及三个次国家(地区)层面(赋权行动小组和东北地区、南部和西部地区以及北部地区(包括西孟加拉邦))生成了优先事项的排名列表。在所有四个主题下,研究方案的实施研究都包括在内的研究领域都占据了十大研究方案中的约 70%。该结果在 NSG 会议上得到了认可。大家一致认为,不同的政府和非政府机构应该考虑这些研究优先事项,并优先考虑实施研究和跨主题的问题。