• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测患者在姑息治疗入院时与相关利益、负担和安全感的因素:一项横断面调查。

Predictors of patient-related benefit, burden and feeling safe in relation to hospital admissions in palliative care: A cross-sectional survey.

机构信息

1 School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

2 Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):167-171. doi: 10.1177/0269216317731991. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1177/0269216317731991
PMID:28952886
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research exploring patient experience of palliative care in the hospital setting has previously been limited to negative aspects of care. However, recent studies have shown that patients with palliative care needs experience benefits being in hospital. Little is known about how experiences of benefit and burden vary according to socio-demographic and illness-related factors and how these experiences influence patient preferences to return to hospital.

AIM

To identify factors influencing experiences of benefit and burden and the predictors associated with a preference to return to hospital in palliative care.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional design using a questionnaire survey.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: In total, 116 hospital inpatients admitted with palliative care needs in an urban hospital in New Zealand. Recruitment was from an oncology ward, four general medical wards and a respiratory ward.

RESULTS

Those living in more deprived areas experienced more benefit being in hospital ( F(4, 109) = 3.15, p = 0.017), while younger people ( F(4, 109) = 4.44, p = 0.00) and those from Asian or Pacific cultures ( F(2, 111) = 7.78, p = 0.000) experienced more burden. Those with a non-cancer diagnosis felt less safe in hospital ( p = 0.04). 'Feeling safe' was a significant ( B = 0.14, p = 0.03) predictor for a preference to return to hospital.

CONCLUSION

Deprivation, diagnosis, age and ethnicity influenced experiences of benefit and burden in hospital. 'Feeling safe' was a significant predictor for a preference to return to hospital. Further research is needed to understand why certain patient factors influence experiences of hospitalisation and how 'feeling safe' can be replicated in other care environments.

摘要

背景

先前,探索医院环境中姑息治疗患者体验的研究仅限于护理的负面方面。然而,最近的研究表明,有姑息治疗需求的患者在住院期间会体验到益处。对于受益和负担的体验如何根据社会人口学和疾病相关因素而有所不同,以及这些体验如何影响患者返回医院的偏好,人们知之甚少。

目的

确定影响受益和负担体验的因素,以及与返回姑息治疗医院的偏好相关的预测因素。

设计

使用问卷调查的横断面设计。

设置/参与者:共有 116 名在新西兰一家城市医院因姑息治疗需求住院的住院患者。招募来自肿瘤科病房、四个普通内科病房和一个呼吸科病房。

结果

居住在较贫困地区的人在住院时受益更多( F(4, 109) = 3.15,p = 0.017),而年轻人( F(4, 109) = 4.44,p = 0.00)和来自亚洲或太平洋文化的人( F(2, 111) = 7.78,p = 0.000)则感到更多的负担。非癌症诊断的人在医院感到更不安全( p = 0.04)。“感到安全”是返回医院的偏好的一个显著( B = 0.14,p = 0.03)预测因素。

结论

贫困、诊断、年龄和种族影响了住院期间的受益和负担体验。“感到安全”是返回医院偏好的一个显著预测因素。需要进一步研究,以了解为什么某些患者因素会影响住院体验,以及如何在其他护理环境中复制“感到安全”。

相似文献

1
Predictors of patient-related benefit, burden and feeling safe in relation to hospital admissions in palliative care: A cross-sectional survey.预测患者在姑息治疗入院时与相关利益、负担和安全感的因素:一项横断面调查。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):167-171. doi: 10.1177/0269216317731991. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
2
A qualitative study exploring the benefits of hospital admissions from the perspectives of patients with palliative care needs.一项定性研究,从有姑息治疗需求的患者角度探索住院治疗的益处。
Palliat Med. 2015 Sep;29(8):703-10. doi: 10.1177/0269216315575841. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
3
The impact of the environment on patient experiences of hospital admissions in palliative care.环境对姑息治疗中医院住院患者体验的影响。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Dec;8(4):485-492. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000891. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
4
The extent and cost of potentially avoidable admissions in hospital inpatients with palliative care needs: a cross-sectional study.姑息治疗需求的住院患者中潜在可避免入院的程度和费用:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Sep;5(3):266-72. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000724. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
5
Circumstances of hospital admissions in palliative care: A cross-sectional survey of patients admitted to hospital with palliative care needs.姑息治疗住院患者的情况:有姑息治疗需求的住院患者的横断面调查。
Palliat Med. 2018 May;32(5):1030-1036. doi: 10.1177/0269216318756221. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
6
Patient and family experiences of palliative care in hospital: what do we know? An integrative review.患者及其家属在医院接受姑息治疗的体验:我们了解什么?一项综合综述。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;28(1):18-33. doi: 10.1177/0269216313487568. Epub 2013 May 13.
7
Caregiver burden, patients' self-perceived burden, and preference for palliative care among cancer patients and caregivers.癌症患者及其照护者的照护负担、患者自我感知的负担以及对姑息治疗的偏好。
Psychooncology. 2015 Nov;24(11):1545-51. doi: 10.1002/pon.3827. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
Experience of care from the perspectives of inpatients with palliative care needs: a cross-sectional study using a patient reported experience measure (PREM).从有姑息治疗需求的住院患者角度体验护理:使用患者报告体验测量工具(PREM)的横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jul 18;23(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01494-4.
10
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.

引用本文的文献

1
iLIVE volunteer study: Volunteer and healthcare professional perceptions of newly developed hospital end-of-life-care volunteer services, in five countries.iLIVE志愿者研究:五个国家志愿者和医疗保健专业人员对新开发的医院临终关怀志愿者服务的看法。
Palliat Med. 2025 Jul;39(7):792-802. doi: 10.1177/02692163251328197. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
Pattern of admissions and needs assessment for palliative care services among in-patients in a tertiary health facility in South-Western Nigeria.尼日利亚西南部一家三级保健机构住院患者的姑息治疗服务入院和需求评估模式。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 19;23(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01537-w.
3
End-of-life care in Germany between 2016 and 2020 - A repeated cross-sectional analysis of statutory health insurance data.
2016 年至 2020 年德国的终末期关怀 - 法定健康保险数据的重复横断面分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 20;23(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01387-6.
4
Safety perception in patients with advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease - a qualitative study.晚期特发性帕金森病患者的安全认知——一项定性研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Sep 6;15:1200143. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1200143. eCollection 2023.
5
Dying at home for people experiencing financial hardship and deprivation: How health and social care professionals recognise and reflect on patients' circumstances.对于面临经济困难和贫困的人来说,在家中离世:健康与社会护理专业人员如何识别并思考患者的情况。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Mar 31;17:26323524231164162. doi: 10.1177/26323524231164162. eCollection 2023.
6
Treatment of a high healthcare utilizer with sepsis in a virtual hybrid hospital-at-home program.在虚拟混合居家医院项目中对一名脓毒症高医疗资源利用者的治疗。
Clin Case Rep. 2023 Jan 3;11(1):e6806. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.6806. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
How Safe Do Dying People Feel at Home? Patients' Perception of Safety While Receiving Specialist Community Palliative Care.临终者在家中感到多安全?接受专科社区姑息治疗的患者对安全的感知。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Aug;40(8):829-836. doi: 10.1177/10499091221140075. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
8
ILIVE Project Volunteer study. Developing international consensus for a European Core Curriculum for hospital end-of-life-care volunteer services, to train volunteers to support patients in the last weeks of life: A Delphi study.ILIVE 项目志愿者研究。为欧洲临终关怀医院志愿者服务制定国际共识核心课程,培训志愿者在生命的最后几周支持患者:德尔菲研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;36(4):652-670. doi: 10.1177/02692163211045305. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
9
The impact of poverty and deprivation at the end of life: a critical review.贫困与临终时贫困状况的影响:一项批判性综述。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2021 Sep 12;15:26323524211033873. doi: 10.1177/26323524211033873. eCollection 2021.
10
Quality indicators for the evaluation of end-of-life care in Germany - a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of statutory health insurance data.德国评估终末期护理质量的指标 - 法定健康保险数据的回顾性横断面分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Dec 8;19(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00679-x.