Voigt André, Nowick Katja, Almaas Eivind
Network Systems Biology Group, Department of Biotechnology, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Sep 28;13(9):e1005739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005739. eCollection 2017 Sep.
Differential co-expression network analyses have recently become an important step in the investigation of cellular differentiation and dysfunctional gene-regulation in cell and tissue disease-states. The resulting networks have been analyzed to identify and understand pathways associated with disorders, or to infer molecular interactions. However, existing methods for differential co-expression network analysis are unable to distinguish between various forms of differential co-expression. To close this gap, here we define the three different kinds (conserved, specific, and differentiated) of differential co-expression and present a systematic framework, CSD, for differential co-expression network analysis that incorporates these interactions on an equal footing. In addition, our method includes a subsampling strategy to estimate the variance of co-expressions. Our framework is applicable to a wide variety of cases, such as the study of differential co-expression networks between healthy and disease states, before and after treatments, or between species. Applying the CSD approach to a published gene-expression data set of cerebral cortex and basal ganglia samples from healthy individuals, we find that the resulting CSD network is enriched in genes associated with cognitive function, signaling pathways involving compounds with well-known roles in the central nervous system, as well as certain neurological diseases. From the CSD analysis, we identify a set of prominent hubs of differential co-expression, whose neighborhood contains a substantial number of genes associated with glioblastoma. The resulting gene-sets identified by our CSD analysis also contain many genes that so far have not been recognized as having a role in glioblastoma, but are good candidates for further studies. CSD may thus aid in hypothesis-generation for functional disease-associations.
差异共表达网络分析最近已成为研究细胞分化以及细胞和组织疾病状态下功能失调的基因调控的重要步骤。对所得网络进行分析,以识别和理解与疾病相关的通路,或推断分子间相互作用。然而,现有的差异共表达网络分析方法无法区分各种形式的差异共表达。为了弥补这一差距,我们在此定义了三种不同类型(保守型、特异型和分化型)的差异共表达,并提出了一个系统框架CSD,用于差异共表达网络分析,该框架平等地纳入了这些相互作用。此外,我们的方法包括一种子采样策略来估计共表达的方差。我们的框架适用于多种情况,例如健康与疾病状态之间、治疗前后或物种之间的差异共表达网络研究。将CSD方法应用于已发表的来自健康个体的大脑皮层和基底神经节样本的基因表达数据集,我们发现所得的CSD网络富含与认知功能相关的基因、涉及在中枢神经系统中具有知名作用的化合物的信号通路,以及某些神经疾病相关基因。通过CSD分析,我们识别出一组显著的差异共表达枢纽,其邻域包含大量与胶质母细胞瘤相关的基因。我们的CSD分析所确定的基因集还包含许多迄今为止尚未被认为在胶质母细胞瘤中起作用,但很适合进一步研究的基因。因此,CSD可能有助于生成关于功能性疾病关联的假设。