Moon Yeonsil, Kim Yoon Sook, Lee Jongmin, Han Seol Heui
Department of Neurology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Quality Improvement, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Nov;32(11):1852-1856. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1852.
Pain is often associated with a more rapid progression of cognitive and functional decline, and behavioral disturbance in dementia. Therefore, it is essential to accurately assesses pain for proper intervention in patients with dementia. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale is an excellent behaviour scale which includes most of the domains that are recommended by the American Geriatrics Society to evaluate when assessing pain in patients with dementia. The purpose of this study was to develop the Korean version of the FLACC (K-FLACC) and to verify its reliability and validity in assessing pain of elderly patients with dementia. We developed the K-FLACC to consist of the five domains (face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability) with scores of 0, 1, and 2 for each domain and a total score ranging from 0 to 10 as in the original FLACC. Eighty-eight patients with dementia who visited Konkuk University Medical Center were evaluated. The K-FLACC revealed good validity as compared to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; r = 0.617, P < 0.001) and the Face Pain Scale (FPS; r = 0.350, P = 0.001). All of the five domains of the K-FLACC were related to the NRS and FPS, in which the activity domain showed the highest correlation. Test-retest reliability was excellent, as the intra-class correlation coefficient comparing the retest to test was 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.82). Our results show that the K-FLACC is a suitable and valuable scale to assess pain in patients with dementia in Korea.
疼痛通常与认知和功能衰退的更快进展以及痴呆症中的行为障碍相关。因此,准确评估疼痛对于痴呆症患者的适当干预至关重要。面部、腿部、活动、哭声和安慰度(FLACC)量表是一种出色的行为量表,它包括美国老年医学会在评估痴呆症患者疼痛时建议评估的大多数领域。本研究的目的是开发韩语版的FLACC(K-FLACC),并验证其在评估老年痴呆症患者疼痛方面的可靠性和有效性。我们开发的K-FLACC由五个领域(面部、腿部、活动、哭声和安慰度)组成,每个领域的得分分别为0、1和2,总分范围为0至10,与原始的FLACC相同。对访问建国大学医学中心的88名痴呆症患者进行了评估。与数字评分量表(NRS;r = 0.617,P < 0.001)和面部疼痛量表(FPS;r = 0.350,P = 0.001)相比,K-FLACC显示出良好的有效性。K-FLACC的所有五个领域都与NRS和FPS相关,其中活动领域的相关性最高。重测信度非常好,因为将重测与测试进行比较的组内相关系数为0.73(95%置信区间,0.59 - 0.82)。我们的结果表明,K-FLACC是评估韩国痴呆症患者疼痛的合适且有价值的量表。