• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安抚(FLACC)行为量表日文版的有效性和可靠性。

Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale.

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Mar 13;13(3):e0194094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194094. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0194094
PMID:29534083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5849287/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients, especially in the preverbal stage, cannot self-report intensity of pain therefore several validated observational tools, including the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale, have been used as a benchmark to evaluate pediatric pain. Unfortunately, this scale is currently unavailable in Japanese, precluding its widespread use in Japanese hospitals.

OBJECTIVES

To translate and verify the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FLACC Behavioral Scale.

METHOD

Back-translation was first conducted by eight medical researchers, then an available sample of patients at the University of Tsukuba Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (from May 2017 to August 2017) was enrolled in a clinical study. Two researchers evaluated the validity of the translated FLACC Behavioral Scale by weighted kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Observational pain was simultaneously measured by the visual analog scale (VAS obs) and reliability was evaluated by correlation analysis.

RESULT

The original author approved the translation. For the clinical study, a total of 121 observations were obtained from 24 pediatric patients. Agreement between observers was highly correlated for each of the FLACC categories (Face: κ = 0.85, Leg: κ = 0.74, Activity: κ = 0.89, Cry: κ = 0.93, Consolability: κ = 0.93) as well as the total score (Total: κ = 0.95,). Correlation analysis demonstrated a good criterion validation between the FLACC scale and the VAS obs. (r = 0.96).

CONCLUSION

Our Japanese version of the FLACC Behavioral Scale shows high validity and reliability.

摘要

背景

儿科患者,尤其是在言语前期,无法自我报告疼痛强度,因此已经使用了几种经过验证的观察工具,包括面部、腿部、活动、哭声、可安慰性(FLACC)行为量表,作为评估儿科疼痛的基准。不幸的是,该量表目前没有日文版本,这限制了它在日本医院的广泛使用。

目的

翻译并验证日本版 FLACC 行为量表的有效性和可靠性。

方法

首先由 8 名医学研究人员进行回译,然后在筑波大学儿科重症监护病房(2017 年 5 月至 2017 年 8 月)招募了一个可用的患者样本进行临床研究。两名研究人员通过加权kappa 系数和组内相关系数(ICC)评估翻译后的 FLACC 行为量表的有效性。同时通过视觉模拟量表(VAS obs)测量观察性疼痛,并通过相关分析评估可靠性。

结果

原始作者批准了翻译。在临床研究中,从 24 名儿科患者中总共获得了 121 次观察结果。观察者在每个 FLACC 类别(面部:κ=0.85,腿部:κ=0.74,活动:κ=0.89,哭声:κ=0.93,可安慰性:κ=0.93)以及总分(总评分:κ=0.95)上的一致性都高度相关。相关性分析表明,FLACC 量表与 VAS obs 之间存在良好的标准验证。(r=0.96)。

结论

我们的日本版 FLACC 行为量表具有较高的有效性和可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edd/5849287/5e84926a12fc/pone.0194094.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edd/5849287/a5cf28cee206/pone.0194094.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edd/5849287/5e84926a12fc/pone.0194094.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edd/5849287/a5cf28cee206/pone.0194094.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edd/5849287/5e84926a12fc/pone.0194094.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale.验证面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安抚(FLACC)行为量表日文版的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 13;13(3):e0194094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194094. eCollection 2018.
2
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Paediatric Pain Profile for children with severe motor and intellectual disabilities.儿童严重运动和智力残疾的小儿疼痛状况简表日语版的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0243566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243566. eCollection 2020.
3
Validity of the Korean Version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability Scale for Assessment of Pain in Dementia Patients.用于评估痴呆患者疼痛的韩文版面部、腿部、活动、哭闹及安慰度量表的效度
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Nov;32(11):1852-1856. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1852.
4
Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.面部、腿部、活动、哭声、可安抚性行为工具评估危重症患者急性疼痛的可靠性和有效性。
Am J Crit Care. 2010 Jan;19(1):55-61; quiz 62. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010624.
5
The COMFORT behavioural scale and the modified FLACC scale in paediatric intensive care.儿科重症监护中的COMFORT行为量表和改良的FLACC量表。
Nurs Crit Care. 2009 May-Jun;14(3):122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00323.x.
6
Development and preliminary psychometric testing of the Multidimensional Assessment of Pain Scale: MAPS.疼痛量表多维评估(MAPS)的编制与初步心理测量学测试
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Apr;17(4):333-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02115.x.
7
The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment.修订后的FLACC观察性疼痛工具:提高了对认知障碍儿童疼痛评估的可靠性和有效性。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Mar;16(3):258-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01773.x.
8
The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment.面部、腿部、活动、哭闹、安抚性观察工具作为评估认知障碍儿童疼痛程度的可靠性和有效性。
Anesth Analg. 2002 Nov;95(5):1224-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00020.
9
Self-report of pain in young people and adults with spastic cerebral palsy: interrater reliability of the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (r-FLACC) scale ratings.痉挛型脑瘫青少年和成人的自我报告疼痛:修订后的面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和安慰(r-FLACC)量表评分的评定者间信度。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Jan;61(1):69-74. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13980. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
10
Clinical validation of FLACC: preverbal patient pain scale.FLACC:非语言患者疼痛量表的临床验证。
Pediatr Nurs. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):140-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for critically ill pediatric patients.危重症儿童患者使用的重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 18;20(4):e0320373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320373. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants.评估新生儿疼痛的临床评定量表。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 14;4(4):MR000064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000064.pub2.
3
Use of a cooling pack to reduce subcutaneous vaccine injection pain in children aged 3-6 years: A single-blind, randomized, parallel-group multicenter study.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of the Japanese version of the Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU.日本版重症监护病房学龄前混淆评估方法的开发。
Acute Med Surg. 2017 Sep 15;5(1):102-105. doi: 10.1002/ams2.306. eCollection 2018 Jan.
2
Visual analogue scale (VAS) as a monitoring tool for daily changes in asthma symptoms in adolescents: a prospective study.视觉模拟量表(VAS)作为青少年哮喘症状每日变化的监测工具:一项前瞻性研究。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2017 Apr 28;13:24. doi: 10.1186/s13223-017-0196-7. eCollection 2017.
3
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
使用冷敷包减轻3至6岁儿童皮下疫苗注射疼痛:一项单盲、随机、平行组多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):e0318322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318322. eCollection 2025.
4
Analgesic Potential Comparison Between Piperine-Combined Curcumin Patch and Non-Piperine Curcumin Patch: A Pragmatic Trial on Post-Cleft Lip/Palate Surgery Pediatric Patients.胡椒碱复合姜黄素贴片与非胡椒碱姜黄素贴片镇痛潜力比较:一项针对唇腭裂修复术后小儿患者的实用性试验。
J Pain Res. 2024 May 25;17:1903-1915. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S463159. eCollection 2024.
5
Pain Management in Pediatric Burns: A Review of the Science behind It.儿科烧伤的疼痛管理:背后科学的综述。
Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2023 Sep 15;2023:9950870. doi: 10.1155/2023/9950870. eCollection 2023.
6
A Systematic Review of the Measurement Properties of Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability Scale for Pediatric Pain Assessment.用于小儿疼痛评估的面部、腿部、活动、哭闹及可安慰性量表测量属性的系统评价
J Pain Res. 2023 Apr 8;16:1185-1196. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S397064. eCollection 2023.
7
Pediatric delirium is associated with increased brain injury marker levels in cardiac surgery patients.儿科谵妄与心脏手术患者的脑损伤标志物水平升高有关。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 4;12(1):18681. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22702-2.
8
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Paediatric Pain Profile for children with severe motor and intellectual disabilities.儿童严重运动和智力残疾的小儿疼痛状况简表日语版的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0243566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243566. eCollection 2020.
9
Predictive factors of first dosage intravenous immunoglobulin-related adverse effects in children.预测儿童首次静脉注射免疫球蛋白相关不良反应的因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):e0227796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227796. eCollection 2020.
10
Verifying the Japanese version of the Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (psCAM-ICU).验证用于重症监护病房的学龄前儿童意识模糊评估方法(psCAM-ICU)的日语版本。
Acute Med Surg. 2019 Apr 9;6(3):287-293. doi: 10.1002/ams2.413. eCollection 2019 Jul.
可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
Establishing intra- and inter-rater agreement of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale for evaluating pain in toddlers during immunization.评估婴幼儿免疫接种时疼痛的面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安抚可操作性量表的组内和组间一致性。
Pain Res Manag. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):e124-8. doi: 10.1155/2013/897104.
5
Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: a valid, rapid, observational tool for screening delirium in the PICU*.康奈尔儿科意识障碍评估量表:一种有效、快速、观察性的工具,用于筛查 PICU 中的谵妄*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):656-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a66b76.
6
Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.面部、腿部、活动、哭声、可安抚性行为工具评估危重症患者急性疼痛的可靠性和有效性。
Am J Crit Care. 2010 Jan;19(1):55-61; quiz 62. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010624.
7
A prospective comparison of post-surgical behavioral pain scales in preschoolers highlighting the risk of false evaluations.学龄前儿童术后行为疼痛量表的前瞻性比较,突出了错误评估的风险。
Pain. 2009 Sep;145(1-2):60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
8
Further validation of the nonverbal pain scale in intensive care patients.重症监护患者非语言疼痛量表的进一步验证
Crit Care Nurse. 2009 Feb;29(1):59-66. doi: 10.4037/ccn2009992.
9
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.组内相关系数:在评估评分者可靠性中的应用。
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
10
The Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 (WAT-1): an assessment instrument for monitoring opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms in pediatric patients.戒断评估工具-1(WAT-1):一种用于监测儿科患者阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物戒断症状的评估工具。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Nov;9(6):573-80. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31818c8328.