Dai James Y, Liang C Jason, LeBlanc Michael, Prentice Ross L, Janes Holly
Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, U.S.A.
Biostatistics Research Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, U.S.A.
Biometrics. 2018 Jun;74(2):753-763. doi: 10.1111/biom.12789. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
Retrospectively measuring markers on stored baseline samples from participants in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) may provide high quality evidence as to the value of the markers for treatment selection. Originally developed for approximating gene-environment interactions in the odds ratio scale, the case-only method has recently been advocated for assessing gene-treatment interactions on rare disease endpoints in randomized clinical trials. In this article, the case-only approach is shown to provide a consistent and efficient estimator of marker by treatment interactions and marker-specific treatment effects on the relative risk scale. The prohibitive rare-disease assumption is no longer needed, broadening the utility of the case-only approach. The case-only method is resource-efficient as markers only need to be measured in cases only. It eliminates the need to model the marker's main effect, and can be used with any parametric or nonparametric learning method. The utility of this approach is illustrated by an application to genetic data in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy trial.
在随机对照试验(RCT)中,对参与者储存的基线样本进行回顾性标记物测量,可能会为标记物在治疗选择中的价值提供高质量证据。病例对照法最初是为在比值比尺度上近似基因-环境相互作用而开发的,最近有人主张用该方法评估随机临床试验中罕见疾病终点的基因-治疗相互作用。在本文中,病例对照法被证明能在相对风险尺度上为标记物与治疗的相互作用以及标记物特异性治疗效果提供一致且有效的估计值。不再需要严格的罕见病假设,这拓宽了病例对照法的应用范围。病例对照法具有资源高效性,因为只需要在病例中测量标记物。它无需对标记物的主效应进行建模,并且可以与任何参数或非参数学习方法一起使用。通过在女性健康倡议(WHI)激素治疗试验中的基因数据应用,说明了该方法的实用性。