• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effects of a housing mobility experiment on participants' residential environments.一项住房流动性实验对参与者居住环境的影响。
Hous Policy Debate. 2017;27(3):419-448. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
2
Does poor health influence residential selection? Understanding mobility among low-income housing voucher recipients in the Moving to Opportunity Study.健康状况不佳会影响居住选择吗?在“搬到机会”研究中了解低收入住房券领取者的流动性。
Hous Policy Debate. 2024;34(4):508-537. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2301336. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Effects of Housing Vouchers on the Long-Term Exposure to Neighborhood Opportunity among Low-Income Families: The Moving to Opportunity Experiment.住房券对低收入家庭长期接触邻里机会的影响:“搬到机会”实验
Hous Stud. 2023;38(1):128-151. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2022.2112154. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
4
Effects of a federal housing voucher experiment on adolescent binge drinking: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.联邦住房券实验对青少年 binge drinking 的影响:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Addiction. 2019 Jan;114(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/add.14379. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
5
Long-term effects of the Moving to Opportunity residential mobility experiment on crime and delinquency.“搬到机会”住宅流动性实验对犯罪和青少年犯罪的长期影响。
J Exp Criminol. 2013 Dec;9(4). doi: 10.1007/s11292-013-9189-9.
6
Associations of housing mobility interventions for children in high-poverty neighborhoods with subsequent mental disorders during adolescence.高贫困社区针对儿童的住房流动干预措施与青少年期后续精神障碍的相关性。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 5;311(9):937-48. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.607.
7
Housing mobility protects against alcohol use for children with socioemotional health vulnerabilities: An experimental design.住房流动有助于保护有社会情感健康风险的儿童免受酒精使用的影响:一项实验设计。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Sep;46(9):1695-1709. doi: 10.1111/acer.14911. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
8
Housing mobility and adolescent mental health: The role of substance use, social networks, and family mental health in the Moving to Opportunity Study.住房流动性与青少年心理健康:在“搬到机会”研究中物质使用、社交网络和家庭心理健康的作用。
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Dec;3:318-325. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
9
Intervening in the residential mobility process: neighborhood outcomes for low-income populations.干预居住流动性过程:低收入人群的邻里结果
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15307-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507308102. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
10
Built Environment Exposures of Adults in the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.“向机会迁移”实验中成年人的建筑环境暴露情况。
Hous Stud. 2020;35(4):703-719. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2019.1630560. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Does poor health influence residential selection? Understanding mobility among low-income housing voucher recipients in the Moving to Opportunity Study.健康状况不佳会影响居住选择吗?在“搬到机会”研究中了解低收入住房券领取者的流动性。
Hous Policy Debate. 2024;34(4):508-537. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2301336. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
2
Poverty reduction and childhood opportunity moves: A randomized trial of cash transfers to low-income U.S. families with infants.减贫与儿童发展机遇行动:针对美国家庭中低收入婴幼儿的现金转移支付随机试验。
Health Place. 2024 Sep;89:103320. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103320. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
3
Effect of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Housing Vouchers on Adolescent Risky Sexual Behavior Over a 15-Year Period.住房券随机对照试验对青少年 15 年风险性行为的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Feb;53(2):457-469. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02736-x. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
4
Using the Moving To Opportunity Experiment to Investigate the Long-Term Impact of Neighborhoods on Healthcare Use by Specific Clinical Conditions and Type of Service.利用“搬到机会”实验研究社区对特定临床病症医疗服务使用及服务类型的长期影响。
Hous Policy Debate. 2023;33(1):269-289. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2021.1951804. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
5
Effects of Housing Vouchers on the Long-Term Exposure to Neighborhood Opportunity among Low-Income Families: The Moving to Opportunity Experiment.住房券对低收入家庭长期接触邻里机会的影响:“搬到机会”实验
Hous Stud. 2023;38(1):128-151. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2022.2112154. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
6
Cancer beliefs and screening behaviors: The impact of neighborhood and other social determinants of health.癌症认知与筛查行为:邻里环境及其他健康社会决定因素的影响
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 27;13:1072259. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1072259. eCollection 2023.
7
Housing mobility protects against alcohol use for children with socioemotional health vulnerabilities: An experimental design.住房流动有助于保护有社会情感健康风险的儿童免受酒精使用的影响:一项实验设计。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Sep;46(9):1695-1709. doi: 10.1111/acer.14911. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
8
Do Alcohol Outlets Mediate the Effects of the Moving to Opportunity Experiment on Adolescent Excessive Drinking? A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.酒精销售渠道是否调节了“向机会转移实验”对青少年过度饮酒的影响?一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(12):1788-1796. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2115847. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
9
The role of the built environment, food prices and neighborhood poverty in fruit and vegetable consumption: An instrumental variable analysis of the moving to opportunity experiment.建筑环境、食品价格和邻里贫困对水果和蔬菜消费的影响:以机会转移实验为例的工具变量分析。
Health Place. 2021 Jan;67:102491. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102491. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
10
Built Environment Exposures of Adults in the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.“向机会迁移”实验中成年人的建筑环境暴露情况。
Hous Stud. 2020;35(4):703-719. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2019.1630560. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.更好邻里环境对儿童的影响:来自“迁居机会”实验的新证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Apr;106(4):855-902. doi: 10.1257/aer.20150572.
2
Neighborhood Opportunity and Location Affordability for Low-Income Renter Families.低收入租房家庭的邻里机会与区位可负担性
Hous Policy Debate. 2016;26(4-5):607-645. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2016.1198410. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
3
Integrating racial/ethnic equity into policy assessments to improve child health.将种族/族裔公平纳入政策评估以改善儿童健康。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Dec;33(12):2222-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1169.
4
Does neighborhood collective efficacy for families change over time? The Boston Neighborhood Survey.家庭的邻里集体效能会随时间变化吗?波士顿邻里调查。
J Community Psychol. 2014 Jan;42(1):61-79. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21594.
5
Examining mediators of housing mobility on adolescent asthma: results from a housing voucher experiment.探究住房流动性对青少年哮喘的影响因素:住房券实验的结果
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;107:136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.020. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
6
Were the mental health benefits of a housing mobility intervention larger for adolescents in higher socioeconomic status families?住房流动干预对社会经济地位较高家庭的青少年心理健康的益处更大吗?
Health Place. 2013 Sep;23:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 24.
7
Differential mental health effects of neighborhood relocation among youth in vulnerable families: results from a randomized trial.弱势家庭青少年邻里搬迁对心理健康的不同影响:一项随机试验的结果
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;69(12):1284-94. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.449.
8
Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults.邻里效应对低收入成年人长期福祉的影响。
Science. 2012 Sep 21;337(6101):1505-10. doi: 10.1126/science.1224648.
9
Gender and crime victimization modify neighborhood effects on adolescent mental health.性别和犯罪受害会改变邻里效应对青少年心理健康的影响。
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):472-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2535. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
10
Awareness and management of chronic disease, insurance status, and health professional shortage areas in the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS): a cross-sectional study.地理和种族间卒中差异原因(REGARDS)研究中的慢性病认知与管理、保险状况和卫生专业短缺领域:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 20;12:208. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-208.

一项住房流动性实验对参与者居住环境的影响。

The effects of a housing mobility experiment on participants' residential environments.

作者信息

Nguyen Quynh C, Acevedo-Garcia Dolores, Schmidt Nicole M, Osypuk Theresa L

机构信息

Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, College of Health, University of Utah.

Institute for Child, Youth and Family Policy at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.

出版信息

Hous Policy Debate. 2017;27(3):419-448. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210. Epub 2016 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210
PMID:28966541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5616217/
Abstract

We used the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing experiment to inform how housing choice vouchers and housing mobility policies can assist families living in high-poverty areas to make opportunity moves to higher quality neighborhoods, across a wide range of neighborhood attributes. We compared the neighborhood attainment of the three randomly-assigned MTO treatment groups (Low Poverty voucher, Section 8 voucher, Control group) at 1997 and 2002 locations (4-7 years after baseline), by using survey reports, and by linking residential histories to numerous different administrative and population-based datasets. Compared to controls, families in Low-Poverty and Section 8 groups experienced substantial improvements in neighborhood conditions across diverse measures, including economic conditions, social systems (e.g., collective efficacy), physical features of the environment (e.g., tree cover) and health outcomes. The Low-poverty voucher group moreover achieved better neighborhood attainment compared to Section 8. Treatment effects were largest for New York and Los Angeles. We discuss the implications of our findings for expanding affordable housing policy.

摘要

我们利用“向机会迁居”(MTO)住房实验,来了解住房选择券和住房流动政策如何帮助生活在高贫困地区的家庭,朝着高质量社区实现机会性迁居,涉及广泛的社区属性。我们通过使用调查报告,并将居住历史与众多不同的行政和基于人口的数据集相链接,比较了1997年和2002年地点(基线后4至7年)三个随机分配的MTO治疗组(低贫困券组、第8节券组、对照组)的社区入住情况。与对照组相比,低贫困组和第8节券组的家庭在各种衡量指标上,包括经济状况、社会系统(如集体效能)、环境的物理特征(如树木覆盖率)和健康结果等方面,社区条件都有显著改善。此外,低贫困券组相比第8节券组实现了更好的社区入住情况。纽约和洛杉矶的治疗效果最为显著。我们讨论了研究结果对扩大经济适用房政策的影响。