Nguyen Quynh C, Acevedo-Garcia Dolores, Schmidt Nicole M, Osypuk Theresa L
Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, College of Health, University of Utah.
Institute for Child, Youth and Family Policy at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.
Hous Policy Debate. 2017;27(3):419-448. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
We used the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing experiment to inform how housing choice vouchers and housing mobility policies can assist families living in high-poverty areas to make opportunity moves to higher quality neighborhoods, across a wide range of neighborhood attributes. We compared the neighborhood attainment of the three randomly-assigned MTO treatment groups (Low Poverty voucher, Section 8 voucher, Control group) at 1997 and 2002 locations (4-7 years after baseline), by using survey reports, and by linking residential histories to numerous different administrative and population-based datasets. Compared to controls, families in Low-Poverty and Section 8 groups experienced substantial improvements in neighborhood conditions across diverse measures, including economic conditions, social systems (e.g., collective efficacy), physical features of the environment (e.g., tree cover) and health outcomes. The Low-poverty voucher group moreover achieved better neighborhood attainment compared to Section 8. Treatment effects were largest for New York and Los Angeles. We discuss the implications of our findings for expanding affordable housing policy.
我们利用“向机会迁居”(MTO)住房实验,来了解住房选择券和住房流动政策如何帮助生活在高贫困地区的家庭,朝着高质量社区实现机会性迁居,涉及广泛的社区属性。我们通过使用调查报告,并将居住历史与众多不同的行政和基于人口的数据集相链接,比较了1997年和2002年地点(基线后4至7年)三个随机分配的MTO治疗组(低贫困券组、第8节券组、对照组)的社区入住情况。与对照组相比,低贫困组和第8节券组的家庭在各种衡量指标上,包括经济状况、社会系统(如集体效能)、环境的物理特征(如树木覆盖率)和健康结果等方面,社区条件都有显著改善。此外,低贫困券组相比第8节券组实现了更好的社区入住情况。纽约和洛杉矶的治疗效果最为显著。我们讨论了研究结果对扩大经济适用房政策的影响。