Suppr超能文献

一项住房流动性实验对参与者居住环境的影响。

The effects of a housing mobility experiment on participants' residential environments.

作者信息

Nguyen Quynh C, Acevedo-Garcia Dolores, Schmidt Nicole M, Osypuk Theresa L

机构信息

Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, College of Health, University of Utah.

Institute for Child, Youth and Family Policy at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.

出版信息

Hous Policy Debate. 2017;27(3):419-448. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210. Epub 2016 Nov 24.

Abstract

We used the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing experiment to inform how housing choice vouchers and housing mobility policies can assist families living in high-poverty areas to make opportunity moves to higher quality neighborhoods, across a wide range of neighborhood attributes. We compared the neighborhood attainment of the three randomly-assigned MTO treatment groups (Low Poverty voucher, Section 8 voucher, Control group) at 1997 and 2002 locations (4-7 years after baseline), by using survey reports, and by linking residential histories to numerous different administrative and population-based datasets. Compared to controls, families in Low-Poverty and Section 8 groups experienced substantial improvements in neighborhood conditions across diverse measures, including economic conditions, social systems (e.g., collective efficacy), physical features of the environment (e.g., tree cover) and health outcomes. The Low-poverty voucher group moreover achieved better neighborhood attainment compared to Section 8. Treatment effects were largest for New York and Los Angeles. We discuss the implications of our findings for expanding affordable housing policy.

摘要

我们利用“向机会迁居”(MTO)住房实验,来了解住房选择券和住房流动政策如何帮助生活在高贫困地区的家庭,朝着高质量社区实现机会性迁居,涉及广泛的社区属性。我们通过使用调查报告,并将居住历史与众多不同的行政和基于人口的数据集相链接,比较了1997年和2002年地点(基线后4至7年)三个随机分配的MTO治疗组(低贫困券组、第8节券组、对照组)的社区入住情况。与对照组相比,低贫困组和第8节券组的家庭在各种衡量指标上,包括经济状况、社会系统(如集体效能)、环境的物理特征(如树木覆盖率)和健康结果等方面,社区条件都有显著改善。此外,低贫困券组相比第8节券组实现了更好的社区入住情况。纽约和洛杉矶的治疗效果最为显著。我们讨论了研究结果对扩大经济适用房政策的影响。

相似文献

1
The effects of a housing mobility experiment on participants' residential environments.
Hous Policy Debate. 2017;27(3):419-448. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
7
Housing mobility protects against alcohol use for children with socioemotional health vulnerabilities: An experimental design.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Sep;46(9):1695-1709. doi: 10.1111/acer.14911. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
9
Intervening in the residential mobility process: neighborhood outcomes for low-income populations.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15307-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507308102. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
10
Built Environment Exposures of Adults in the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.
Hous Stud. 2020;35(4):703-719. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2019.1630560. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

2
Poverty reduction and childhood opportunity moves: A randomized trial of cash transfers to low-income U.S. families with infants.
Health Place. 2024 Sep;89:103320. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103320. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
3
Effect of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Housing Vouchers on Adolescent Risky Sexual Behavior Over a 15-Year Period.
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Feb;53(2):457-469. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02736-x. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
6
Cancer beliefs and screening behaviors: The impact of neighborhood and other social determinants of health.
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 27;13:1072259. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1072259. eCollection 2023.
7
Housing mobility protects against alcohol use for children with socioemotional health vulnerabilities: An experimental design.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Sep;46(9):1695-1709. doi: 10.1111/acer.14911. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
10
Built Environment Exposures of Adults in the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.
Hous Stud. 2020;35(4):703-719. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2019.1630560. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

2
Neighborhood Opportunity and Location Affordability for Low-Income Renter Families.
Hous Policy Debate. 2016;26(4-5):607-645. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2016.1198410. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
3
Integrating racial/ethnic equity into policy assessments to improve child health.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Dec;33(12):2222-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1169.
4
Does neighborhood collective efficacy for families change over time? The Boston Neighborhood Survey.
J Community Psychol. 2014 Jan;42(1):61-79. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21594.
5
Examining mediators of housing mobility on adolescent asthma: results from a housing voucher experiment.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;107:136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.020. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
6
Were the mental health benefits of a housing mobility intervention larger for adolescents in higher socioeconomic status families?
Health Place. 2013 Sep;23:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 24.
7
8
Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults.
Science. 2012 Sep 21;337(6101):1505-10. doi: 10.1126/science.1224648.
9
Gender and crime victimization modify neighborhood effects on adolescent mental health.
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):472-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2535. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验