Patil Anup Raghunath, Varma Siddhartha, Suragimath Girish, Abbayya Keshava, Zope Sameer Anil, Kale Vishwajeet
Postgraduate Student, Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Sciences, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed University, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Reader, Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Sciences, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed University, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):ZC123-ZC126. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/29428.10526. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
Dentinal Hypersensitivity (DH) is one of the most commonly encountered clinical problems. Literature reveals no specific therapy to satisfactorily eliminate dentinal hypersensitivity.
The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of iontophoresis with 0.33% Sodium Fluoride (NaF) gel and diode laser alone in dentinal tubule occlusion.
This in vitro study included 20 teeth with intact root surfaces unaltered by extraction procedure for specimen preparation. Each tooth was cleaned, air dried and cut into three sections. Total 60 sections were prepared (30 longitudinal and 30 transverse sections), which were acid etched. In control group, no treatment was carried. In iontophoresis treatment group, samples were inserted into a foam tray containing 0.33 % NaF Gel and subjected to 1.5 mA output current for three minutes. In laser treatment group, specimens were lased with 980 nm diode laser at 0.5 W/PW (62.2J /cm) in a noncontact mode for 30 seconds. Specimens were evaluated under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) at 10KV to 20KV under x 2000, x5000 magnification for surface characteristics and patency of dentinal tubules. Total number of tubules visible, open, completely and partially occluded were recorded in each microphotograph and compared.
On comparison, laser group showed the least number of open tubules i.e., 130 (31.1%) followed by iontophoresis group, 155 (51.32%) and control group 417 (100%).
Diode laser application provided better results as compared to iontophoresis on occlusion of dentinal tubules. Hence, it can be used to treat the patients with DH.
牙本质过敏症(DH)是最常见的临床问题之一。文献表明,尚无令人满意地消除牙本质过敏症的特异性疗法。
本研究旨在评估并比较0.33%氟化钠(NaF)凝胶离子导入法和单独使用二极管激光在封闭牙本质小管方面的疗效。
本体外研究纳入20颗牙根表面完整且未因拔牙程序而改变的牙齿用于标本制备。每颗牙齿均进行清洁、空气干燥并切成三段。共制备60个切片(30个纵切片和30个横切片),并进行酸蚀处理。对照组不进行任何处理。在离子导入治疗组中,将样本插入含有0.33% NaF凝胶的泡沫托盘中,并施加1.5 mA输出电流三分钟。在激光治疗组中,使用9% nm二极管激光以0.5 W/PW(62.2J /cm)的功率在非接触模式下对标本照射30秒。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下于10KV至20KV、放大倍数为x2000、x5000的条件下评估标本的表面特征和牙本质小管的通畅情况。记录每张显微照片中可见、开放、完全和部分封闭的小管总数并进行比较。
相比之下,激光组开放小管数量最少,即130个(31.1%),其次是离子导入组,为155个(51.32%),对照组为417个(100%)。
与离子导入法相比,应用二极管激光在封闭牙本质小管方面效果更佳。因此,它可用于治疗牙本质过敏症患者。