Assis Jorgiana Silva de, Rodrigues Lidiany Karla Azevedo, Fonteles Cristiane Sá Roriz, Colares Regina Cláudia Ramos, Souza André Mattos Brito de, Santiago Sérgio Lima
Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2011;22(2):157-61. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000200012.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two desensitizing agents in the reduction of dentin hypersensitivity in a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial. Seventy-seven teeth from 13 patients that presented some degree of sensitivity to probing and/or air stimulation were treated with one of the following desensitizing agents: Oxa-Gel (G1), Sensi Kill (G2) and placebo gel (G3 - control). According to paired t-test, all treatments, even the placebo gel, were capable of reducing sensitivity scores for both stimuli. Analysis of data by ANOVA and Tukey's test (?=0.05) showed that the sensitivity scores were significantly lower only for Sensi Kill in comparison to the other products (Oxa-Gel and placebo), when air stimulus was applied. It may be concluded that treatment with Sensi Kill presented a slightly better performance in reducing dentin hypersensitivity when compared to the other desensitizing agent.
本研究的目的是在一项随机、双盲、半口临床试验中,评估两种脱敏剂在降低牙本质过敏方面的疗效。对13名患者的77颗对探诊和/或空气刺激有一定程度敏感的牙齿,使用以下一种脱敏剂进行治疗:氧凝胶(G1组)、Sensi Kill(G2组)和安慰剂凝胶(G3组 - 对照组)。根据配对t检验,所有治疗,甚至安慰剂凝胶,都能够降低两种刺激的敏感评分。通过方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)对数据进行分析表明,在施加空气刺激时,与其他产品(氧凝胶和安慰剂)相比,仅Sensi Kill的敏感评分显著更低。可以得出结论,与其他脱敏剂相比,使用Sensi Kill治疗在降低牙本质过敏方面表现略优。