1College of Health and Human Services,San Diego State University,San Diego,CA,USA.
3Department of Health Behavior,Gillings School of Global Public Health,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Chapel Hill,NC,USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Dec;20(18):3333-3342. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003621. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
The present study examined food and beverage distributors' sourcing, placement and promotion of obesogenic (energy-dense, nutrient-poor) product categories from the perspective of small food store owners/managers. The obesogenic product categories of interest were savoury snacks, sugary beverages, sweet snacks, confectionery and frozen treats. Specifically, we examined how frequently distributors sourced these products, and the types of agreements and expectations they had for their placement and promotion. Differences were explored by store size and ethnicity. Fresh produce was used as a comparison when examining differences in frequency of sourcing only, with implications for healthy food access.
Survey research involving in-person interviews.
Four urban areas in the USA: Baltimore, MD; Durham, NC; Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN; and San Diego, CA.
Seventy-two small food store owners/managers, 65 % consent rate.
Most distributors sourced obesogenic products weekly. Agreements to place products were predominantly informal (e.g. handshake) with sweet snack, confectionery and frozen treat distributors, and formal (e.g. contract) with savoury snack and sugary beverage distributors. Free-standing displays were the most common incentive provided by distributors and they expected some control over their placement and pricing. Free/discounted products and signage were also common incentives but slotting fees were not. Smaller stores and ethnic stores were less likely to receive various incentives, but among sweet snack distributors, they were more likely to control the price in ethnic v. non-ethnic stores.
Obesogenic products are ubiquitous. Influencing what is made available to consumers in the retail food environment needs to consider the distributor.
本研究从小型食品店店主/经理的角度考察了食品和饮料经销商对致肥胖(能量密集、营养贫乏)产品类别的采购、放置和推广。我们感兴趣的致肥胖产品类别有咸味零食、含糖饮料、甜食、糖果和冷冻食品。具体来说,我们研究了经销商采购这些产品的频率,以及他们对产品放置和推广的协议和期望类型。按店面规模和种族进行了差异探讨。在仅考察采购频率的差异时,使用新鲜农产品作为比较,这对健康食品的获取有影响。
涉及面对面访谈的调查研究。
美国四个城市:马里兰州巴尔的摩、北卡罗来纳州达勒姆、明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯/圣保罗和加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥。
72 名小型食品店店主/经理,同意率为 65%。
大多数经销商每周都采购致肥胖产品。与甜零食、糖果和冷冻食品经销商的协议主要是非正式的(如握手),而与咸零食和含糖饮料经销商的协议则是正式的(如合同)。独立式展示是经销商提供的最常见的激励措施,他们希望对产品的位置和价格有一定的控制。免费/折扣产品和标志也是常见的激励措施,但不收取上架费。较小的商店和族裔商店获得各种激励措施的可能性较低,但在甜零食经销商中,他们更有可能控制族裔商店和非族裔商店的价格。
致肥胖产品无处不在。在零售食品环境中影响消费者可获得的产品需要考虑经销商。