University of Illinois at Chicago.
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
J Pers Disord. 2018 Dec;32(6):753-765. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_323. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
In Section III of the , the American Psychiatric Association (APA) proposes a pathological personality trait model of personality disorders. The recommended assessment instrument is the Personality Inventory for the (PID-5), an empirically derived scale that assesses personality pathology along five domains and 25 facets. Although the PID-5 demonstrates strong convergent validity with other personality measures, no study has examined whether it identifies traits that run in families, another important step toward validating the 's dimensional model. Using a family study method, we investigated familial associations of PID-5 domain and facet scores in 195 families, examining associations between parents and offspring and across siblings. The Psychoticism, Antagonism, and Detachment domains showed significant familial aggregation, as did facets of Negative Affect and Disinhibition. Results are discussed in the context of personality pathology and family study methodology. The results also help validate the PID-5, given the familial nature of personality traits.
在第三部分中，美国精神病学协会 (APA) 提出了一种人格障碍的病理性人格特质模型。推荐的评估工具是人格障碍检查表第五版 (PID-5)，这是一种经验衍生的量表，沿着五个领域和 25 个方面评估人格病理。尽管 PID-5 与其他人格测量具有很强的收敛效度，但没有研究检验它是否能识别家族中存在的特征，这是验证该检查表维度模型的另一个重要步骤。使用家庭研究方法，我们在 195 个家庭中调查了 PID-5 领域和方面得分的家族关联性，考察了父母与子女以及兄弟姐妹之间的关联。精神病态、对抗和分离等领域表现出显著的家族聚集性，消极情绪和去抑制等方面也是如此。结果在人格病理学和家庭研究方法的背景下进行了讨论。鉴于人格特质的家族性质，这些结果也有助于验证 PID-5。
