Centre for Forensic Behavioral Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Clifton Hill, Australia.
Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health (Forensicare), Fairfield, Australia.
J Pers Disord. 2018 Oct;32(5):668-693. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_322. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
This study explored associations between aggression and the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) domains and facets in 208 male offenders. Regression analyses revealed no significant domain-level relationships using either the APA-three facets only (Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2013) or the Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, and Skodol (2012) scoring algorithms. The PID-5 facets of Hostility and Risk Taking were significantly associated with aggression. These findings highlight the importance of a facet-level analysis when exploring the PD-aggression relationship. The authors call attention to how this knowledge can contribute to clinical-forensic practice and note limitations associated with using only PID-5 domain-level scoring approaches. More research is required to determine whether a universally accepted scoring approach can be adopted and promoted alongside future versions of the PID-5.
本研究探讨了 208 名男性罪犯的攻击行为与 DSM-5 人格量表（PID-5）各领域和方面之间的关系。回归分析显示，使用 APA 三因素（Krueger、Derringer、Markon、Watson 和 Skodol，2013）或 Krueger、Derringer、Markon、Watson 和 Skodol（2012）评分算法，均未发现各领域水平存在显著关系。PID-5 的敌意和冒险特质与攻击行为显著相关。这些发现强调了在探索 PD-攻击关系时进行特质层面分析的重要性。作者提请注意如何将这方面的知识应用于临床-法医实践，并指出仅使用 PID-5 领域水平评分方法存在的局限性。需要进一步研究以确定是否可以采用并推广一种通用的评分方法，以及在 PID-5 的未来版本中使用。
