John Aesha, Zapata Roblyer Martha
Aesha John, Department of Social Work, Texas Christian University, and.
Martha I. Zapata Roblyer, Department of Human Development and Family Science, Oklahoma State University-Tulsa.
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2017 Oct;55(5):325-337. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-55.5.325.
We examined relevance of the key constructs of the stress and resilience framework in the urban Indian context. Analyses of interviews with urban Indian mothers (N = 47) of a 3-6 year old child with intellectual disability generated themes on maternal appraisals of the child's disability, perceived stressors, and resources. Mothers seemed to utilize a combination of fact-based and religious explanation to make sense of their child's disability. Parental stressors ranged from child-related factors (diagnosis, behavioral problems) to financial and family-level challenges. However, participants also reported a number of personal, family-level, and societal resources that helped them cope with the stressors. Study findings are discussed in the context of implications for practice, policy, and research.
我们考察了压力与复原力框架的关键要素在印度城市背景下的相关性。对47位印度城市中患有智力残疾的3至6岁儿童的母亲进行访谈分析,得出了关于母亲对孩子残疾的评估、感知到的压力源和资源等主题。母亲们似乎综合运用基于事实的解释和宗教解释来理解孩子的残疾。父母面临的压力源范围从与孩子相关的因素(诊断、行为问题)到经济和家庭层面的挑战。然而,参与者也报告了一些有助于他们应对压力源的个人、家庭层面和社会资源。我们在实践、政策和研究的影响背景下讨论了研究结果。