• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在严重颈动脉狭窄的血管成形术和支架置入术中,以曲线为中心的斑块会增加围手术期神经和心血管并发症的风险。

Curve-centered plaques raise the risk of peri-operative neurological and cardiovascular complications during angioplasty and stenting for severe carotid stenosis.

作者信息

Kang Chul-Hoo, Rhim Jong-Kook, Kim Hong Jun, Choi Jay Chol, Kim Joong-Goo

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Republic of Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 7;15:1455135. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1455135. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1455135
PMID:39434834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11491322/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Carotid artery stenting is an alternative interventional treatment to carotid endarterectomy. However, preprocedural considerations and anatomical risk factor analyses for carotid artery stenting are currently insufficient. Therefore, we investigated the high-risk anatomical appearance of carotid artery stenting from the neurointerventionist perspective to predict periprocedural complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with carotid stenosis who underwent carotid artery stenting at a comprehensive stroke center between January 2012 and December 2021. We compared the demographic characteristics, medical history, and anatomical appearance of the stenotic segment in patients with and without complications.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 148 patients (64 women [43.2%]; median age, 73.0 [interquartile range, 65.5-79.0]). Complications occurred in 39 of the 148 patients, primarily minor and transient. Of baseline or procedural characteristics, a high initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ( = 0.04), symptomatic stenosis ( = 0.01), and curve-centered plaque of the proximal ICA ( = 0.01) were significantly associated with carotid artery stenting complications in unadjusted analysis. Curve-centered plaque remained an independent risk factor for carotid artery stenting complications after adjustment (odds ratio 2.23[1.02-4.88], = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

High-risk vascular anatomical features, such as curve-centered plaque, are associated with a high frequency of periprocedural complications of carotid artery stenting. Tailored patient selection for carotid stenosis is crucial to prevent complications. Patients with curve-centered plaque should consider alternative treatment options such as carotid endarterectomy to achieve optimal clinical results.

摘要

引言

颈动脉支架置入术是颈动脉内膜切除术的一种替代性介入治疗方法。然而,目前对于颈动脉支架置入术的术前考虑因素和解剖风险因素分析尚不充分。因此,我们从神经介入专家的角度研究了颈动脉支架置入术的高风险解剖表现,以预测围手术期并发症。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了2012年1月至2021年12月期间在一家综合性卒中中心接受颈动脉支架置入术的颈动脉狭窄患者。我们比较了有并发症和无并发症患者的人口统计学特征、病史以及狭窄段的解剖表现。

结果

我们共分析了148例患者(64例女性[43.2%];中位年龄73.0岁[四分位间距,65.5 - 79.0岁])。148例患者中有39例发生并发症,主要为轻微且短暂的并发症。在未调整分析中,初始美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分较高(P = 0.04)、症状性狭窄(P = 0.01)以及颈内动脉近端的曲线中心斑块(P = 0.01)与颈动脉支架置入术并发症显著相关。调整后,曲线中心斑块仍然是颈动脉支架置入术并发症的独立危险因素(优势比2.23[1.02 - 4.88],P = 0.04)。

结论

高风险血管解剖特征,如曲线中心斑块,与颈动脉支架置入术围手术期并发症的高发生率相关。为预防并发症,针对颈动脉狭窄进行个体化的患者选择至关重要。有曲线中心斑块的患者应考虑替代治疗方案,如颈动脉内膜切除术,以获得最佳临床效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b57/11491322/28bc686ca343/fneur-15-1455135-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b57/11491322/aa46ac4c9711/fneur-15-1455135-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b57/11491322/28bc686ca343/fneur-15-1455135-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b57/11491322/aa46ac4c9711/fneur-15-1455135-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b57/11491322/28bc686ca343/fneur-15-1455135-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Curve-centered plaques raise the risk of peri-operative neurological and cardiovascular complications during angioplasty and stenting for severe carotid stenosis.在严重颈动脉狭窄的血管成形术和支架置入术中,以曲线为中心的斑块会增加围手术期神经和心血管并发症的风险。
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 7;15:1455135. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1455135. eCollection 2024.
2
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 25;2(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5.
3
Predictors of periprocedural complications of carotid artery stenting - a multivariate analysis of a single-centre experience.颈动脉支架置入术围手术期并发症的预测因素——单中心经验的多变量分析
Vasa. 2016 Sep;45(5):387-93. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000550. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
4
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients.颈动脉狭窄高危患者颈动脉支架置入术的结果:单神经血管中心 101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):448-53; discussion 453-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD.
5
Recent advances in carotid angioplasty and stenting.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的最新进展。
Int J Stroke. 2016 Jan;11(1):19-27. doi: 10.1177/1747493015616637.
6
Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial.症状性重度颈动脉狭窄患者内膜切除术与血管成形术对比研究(EVA-3S)试验:一项随机多中心试验的4年随访结果
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):885-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70195-9. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
7
Plaque morphology (the PLAC Scale) on CT angiography: predicting long-term anatomical success of primary carotid stenting.CT血管造影上的斑块形态(PLAC量表):预测原发性颈动脉支架置入术的长期解剖学成功率。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Oct;123(4):856-61. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS14811. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
8
Length of carotid stenosis predicts peri-procedural stroke or death and restenosis in patients randomized to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy.颈动脉狭窄的程度可预测随机接受血管内治疗或动脉内膜切除术患者的围手术期卒中或死亡以及再狭窄情况。
Int J Stroke. 2014 Apr;9(3):297-305. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12084. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
9
[Clinical analysis of carotid angioplasty stenting for high-grade extracranial carotid artery stenosis combined with severe tortuosity].[颈动脉血管成形术支架置入治疗颅外段颈动脉重度狭窄合并严重迂曲的临床分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Jul 7;95(25):1980-5.
10
Statins reduce peri-procedural complications in carotid stenting.他汀类药物可降低颈动脉支架置入术围手术期并发症。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;48(6):626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.无症状性颈动脉手术试验 2(ACST-2):颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的随机比较
Lancet. 2021 Sep 18;398(10305):1065-1073. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01910-3. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
2
Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较
Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):e3-e5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030521. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
3
Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.
1999 - 2014年美国医疗保险人群中的颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1035-1046. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12882.
4
The Annual Trends between Neurointerventional and Neurosurgical Procedures in Korea: Analysis using HIRA Data from 2010 to 2016.韩国神经介入手术与神经外科手术的年度趋势:基于2010年至2016年韩国健康保险审查与评估服务(HIRA)数据的分析
Neurointervention. 2017 Sep;12(2):77-82. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2017.12.2.77. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
5
Predictors of periprocedural complications of carotid artery stenting - a multivariate analysis of a single-centre experience.颈动脉支架置入术围手术期并发症的预测因素——单中心经验的多变量分析
Vasa. 2016 Sep;45(5):387-93. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000550. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
6
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2016年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38-360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
7
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial.支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状颈动脉狭窄的长期疗效:国际颈动脉支架置入术研究(ICSS)随机试验
Lancet. 2015 Feb 7;385(9967):529-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61184-3. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
8
Correlation of extracranial internal carotid artery tortuosity index and intraprocedural complications during carotid artery stenting.颈内动脉颅外段迂曲指数与颈动脉支架置入术中并发症的相关性。
Eur Neurol. 2012;68(2):65-72. doi: 10.1159/000337682. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
9
Short-term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta-analysis of individual patient data.症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入与内膜切除术的短期结局:一项个体化患者数据的预先计划的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1062-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61009-4. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
10
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术的比较(国际颈动脉支架研究):一项随机对照试验的中期分析。
Lancet. 2010 Mar 20;375(9719):985-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60239-5. Epub 2010 Feb 25.