Kang Chul-Hoo, Rhim Jong-Kook, Kim Hong Jun, Choi Jay Chol, Kim Joong-Goo
Department of Neurology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 7;15:1455135. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1455135. eCollection 2024.
Carotid artery stenting is an alternative interventional treatment to carotid endarterectomy. However, preprocedural considerations and anatomical risk factor analyses for carotid artery stenting are currently insufficient. Therefore, we investigated the high-risk anatomical appearance of carotid artery stenting from the neurointerventionist perspective to predict periprocedural complications.
We retrospectively reviewed patients with carotid stenosis who underwent carotid artery stenting at a comprehensive stroke center between January 2012 and December 2021. We compared the demographic characteristics, medical history, and anatomical appearance of the stenotic segment in patients with and without complications.
We analyzed a total of 148 patients (64 women [43.2%]; median age, 73.0 [interquartile range, 65.5-79.0]). Complications occurred in 39 of the 148 patients, primarily minor and transient. Of baseline or procedural characteristics, a high initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ( = 0.04), symptomatic stenosis ( = 0.01), and curve-centered plaque of the proximal ICA ( = 0.01) were significantly associated with carotid artery stenting complications in unadjusted analysis. Curve-centered plaque remained an independent risk factor for carotid artery stenting complications after adjustment (odds ratio 2.23[1.02-4.88], = 0.04).
High-risk vascular anatomical features, such as curve-centered plaque, are associated with a high frequency of periprocedural complications of carotid artery stenting. Tailored patient selection for carotid stenosis is crucial to prevent complications. Patients with curve-centered plaque should consider alternative treatment options such as carotid endarterectomy to achieve optimal clinical results.
颈动脉支架置入术是颈动脉内膜切除术的一种替代性介入治疗方法。然而,目前对于颈动脉支架置入术的术前考虑因素和解剖风险因素分析尚不充分。因此,我们从神经介入专家的角度研究了颈动脉支架置入术的高风险解剖表现,以预测围手术期并发症。
我们回顾性分析了2012年1月至2021年12月期间在一家综合性卒中中心接受颈动脉支架置入术的颈动脉狭窄患者。我们比较了有并发症和无并发症患者的人口统计学特征、病史以及狭窄段的解剖表现。
我们共分析了148例患者(64例女性[43.2%];中位年龄73.0岁[四分位间距,65.5 - 79.0岁])。148例患者中有39例发生并发症,主要为轻微且短暂的并发症。在未调整分析中,初始美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分较高(P = 0.04)、症状性狭窄(P = 0.01)以及颈内动脉近端的曲线中心斑块(P = 0.01)与颈动脉支架置入术并发症显著相关。调整后,曲线中心斑块仍然是颈动脉支架置入术并发症的独立危险因素(优势比2.23[1.02 - 4.88],P = 0.04)。
高风险血管解剖特征,如曲线中心斑块,与颈动脉支架置入术围手术期并发症的高发生率相关。为预防并发症,针对颈动脉狭窄进行个体化的患者选择至关重要。有曲线中心斑块的患者应考虑替代治疗方案,如颈动脉内膜切除术,以获得最佳临床效果。