Ferrer-Sola M, Sureda-Vidal H, Altimiras-Roset J, Fontsere-Candell E, Gonzalez-Martinez V, Espaulella-Panicot J, Falanga V, Otero-Viñas M
The Tissue Repair and Regeneration Laboratory, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitari de la Santa Creu de Vic, Wound Unit, Vic, Barcelona, Spain.
The Tissue Repair and Regeneration Laboratory, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Barcelona, Spain; Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Hospital Universitari de Vic,Vic, Barcelona, Spain.
J Wound Care. 2017 Oct 2;26(10):593-599. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.10.593.
Hydrosurgical debridement allows removal of non-viable tissue, preserving healthy tissues. This study was designed to analyse whether hydrosurgery, used in a clinical wounds unit, is an effective and safe method that may reduce debridement time.
Patients' wounds had the following characteristics: wounds with devitalised tissue needing rapid debridement, wounds with cavities, or non-healing wounds. Hydrosurgical debridement uses a pressurised stream of saline (0.9% sodium chloride) and a vacuum around this stream to remove the devitalised tissue of the wound, preserving healthy surrounding tissues.
This prospective study comprised of 53 wounds from 39 patients. The wound aetiology included 39.7% arterial insufficiency, 22.6% pressure ulcers (PUs), 15.1% diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), 9.4% venous leg ulcers (VLUs), and 13.2% from other aetiologies. The percentage of wounds according the size was the following: 32.1% (<10cm), 43.4% (10-49cm), 15.1% (50-99cm), and 9.4% (≥100cm). Superficial wounds were 43.4% of the total and 56.6% of wounds had cavities. Pain associated with the hydrosurgery was mild to moderate. There were no hydrosurgery-related adverse events. For effective debridement, the required sessions were as follows: one procedure (73.6%), two procedures (18.9%) and three procedures (7.5%). There was a statistical significant direct correlation (r=0.307) between the number of required sessions and wound size. All patients improved in a week (>80% of granulation tissue).
We demonstrate that hydrosurgery is an effective and rapid debridement method that can be used safely in the outpatient setting.
水刀清创术能够清除失活组织,同时保留健康组织。本研究旨在分析在临床伤口治疗单元中使用水刀清创术是否为一种有效且安全的方法,是否可以缩短清创时间。
患者伤口具有以下特征:伴有需要快速清创的失活组织的伤口、有空腔的伤口或不愈合伤口。水刀清创术利用加压的生理盐水流(0.9%氯化钠)以及围绕该水流的负压来清除伤口的失活组织,同时保留周围的健康组织。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了39例患者的53处伤口。伤口病因包括39.7%的动脉供血不足、22.6%的压疮(PU)、15.1%的糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)、9.4%的下肢静脉溃疡(VLU)以及13.2%的其他病因。根据伤口大小划分的伤口百分比情况如下:32.1%(<10cm)、43.4%(10 - 49cm)、15.1%(50 - 99cm)以及9.4%(≥100cm)。浅表伤口占总数的43.4%,56.6%的伤口存在空腔。与水刀清创术相关的疼痛为轻至中度。未发生与水刀清创术相关的不良事件。为实现有效清创,所需的治疗次数如下:一次治疗(73.6%)、两次治疗(18.9%)以及三次治疗(7.5%)。所需治疗次数与伤口大小之间存在统计学显著的正相关(r = 0.307)。所有患者在一周内均有改善(肉芽组织>80%)。
我们证明水刀清创术是一种有效且快速的清创方法,可在门诊环境中安全使用。