• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
'Simply to be let in': opening the doors to lower-income older adults and their companion animals.“仅仅是被允许进入”:为低收入的老年群体及其伴侣动物敞开大门。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Sep 1;40(3):661-665. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx111.
2
Aging in Place in Social Housing: A Scoping Review of Social Housing for Older Adults.社会住房中的就地养老:针对老年人的社会住房范围综述
Can J Aging. 2023 Mar;42(1):69-79. doi: 10.1017/S0714980822000125. Epub 2022 May 20.
3
Disruptive Solidarity or Solidarity Disrupted? A Dialogical Narrative Analysis of Economically Vulnerable Older Adults' Efforts to Age in Place with Pets.破坏团结还是团结被破坏?对经济上脆弱的老年人与宠物一起居家养老努力的对话式叙事分析
Public Health Ethics. 2018 Jun 6;12(1):15-29. doi: 10.1093/phe/phy009. eCollection 2019 Apr.
4
No pets allowed? Companion animals, older people and residential care.禁止养宠物?伴侣动物、老年人与住宿护理。
Med Humanit. 2019 Jun;45(2):211-222. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2019-011651.
5
Commentary: irrational exuberance for the aging in place of vulnerable low-income older homeowners.评论:对弱势低收入老年房主就地养老的非理性热情。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2008;20(4):379-97. doi: 10.1080/08959420802131437.
6
The Spillover Effect of a Flood on Pets and Their People: Implications for Rental Housing.洪水对宠物及其主人的溢出效应:对出租住房的影响。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2019 Jul-Sep;22(3):229-239. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2018.1476863. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
7
Considering Cats, Dogs, and Contradictions: Pets and Their Relational Influence on Experiences of Aging in Place.考虑猫、狗和矛盾:宠物及其对就地养老体验的关系影响。
Can J Aging. 2023 Sep;42(3):506-515. doi: 10.1017/S0714980823000168. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
8
The housing challenges of low-income older adults and the role of federal policy.低收入老年人的住房问题与联邦政策的作用。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 May-Jun;30(3-4):227-243. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1462679. Epub 2018 May 22.
9
Food Security Challenges and Health Opportunities of Companion Animal Ownership for Low-Income Adults.低收入成年人饲养伴侣动物面临的粮食安全挑战与健康机遇
J Evid Based Soc Work (2019). 2020 Nov-Dec;17(6):662-676. doi: 10.1080/26408066.2020.1781726. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
10
Factors related to type of companion pet owned by older women.与老年女性所拥有的伴侣宠物类型相关的因素。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2012 Nov;50(11):30-7. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20121003-01. Epub 2012 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Companion animal foster caregiving: a scoping review exploring animal and caregiver welfare, barriers to caregiver recruitment and retention, and best practices for foster care programs in animal shelters.伴侣动物寄养照料:一项范围综述,探讨动物和照料者的福利、照料者招募与留用的障碍以及动物收容所寄养照料项目的最佳实践。
PeerJ. 2024 Dec 13;12:e18623. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18623. eCollection 2024.
2
Housing-related companion animal relinquishment across 21 animal shelters in the United States from 2019-2023.2019年至2023年期间,美国21家动物收容所中与住房相关的伴侣动物遗弃情况。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jul 10;11:1430388. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1430388. eCollection 2024.
3
"Whoever takes the dog gets the house": How older adults negotiate, budget, and deploy resources for multispecies family health and well-being.“谁养了狗就能得到房子”:老年人如何为多物种家庭的健康与幸福进行协商、规划预算并调配资源。
Soc Work Ment Health. 2023;21(6):757-783. doi: 10.1080/15332985.2023.2265005. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
4
Companion Animal Fostering as Health Promotion: A Literature Review.伴侣动物寄养作为健康促进手段的文献综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 21;20(13):6199. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20136199.
5
Longitudinal associations between allostatic load, pet ownership, and socioeconomic position among U.S. adults aged 50.美国50岁成年人的应激负荷、宠物饲养与社会经济地位之间的纵向关联。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jan 14;21:101344. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101344. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
The Impact of Sustained Ownership of a Pet on Cognitive Health: A Population-Based Study.宠物持续拥有对认知健康的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
J Aging Health. 2023 Mar;35(3-4):230-241. doi: 10.1177/08982643221122641. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
7
Leashes, Litterboxes, and Lifelines: Exploring Volunteer-Based Pet Care Assistance Programs for Older Adults.牵引绳、猫砂盆与生命线:探索面向老年人的基于志愿者的宠物护理援助项目
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 26;13:873372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873372. eCollection 2022.
8
Pet-Friendly for Whom? An Analysis of Pet Fees in Texas Rental Housing.对谁而言宠物友好?德克萨斯州出租房屋宠物费用分析。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Nov 8;8:767149. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.767149. eCollection 2021.
9
Understanding the Benefits, Challenges, and the Role of Pet Ownership in the Daily Lives of Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Case Study.了解宠物饲养在社区居住老年人日常生活中的益处、挑战及作用:一项案例研究
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 7;11(9):2628. doi: 10.3390/ani11092628.
10
Human-Animal Relationships in Supported Housing: Animal Atmospheres for Mental Health Recovery.支持性住房中的人-动物关系:促进心理健康恢复的动物氛围
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 18;12:712133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712133. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of dog ownership on objective measures of free-living physical activity and sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults: a longitudinal case-controlled study.养狗对社区居住老年人自由生活身体活动和久坐行为客观指标的影响:一项纵向病例对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 9;17(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4422-5.
2
Pet ownership and survival in the elderly hypertensive population.老年高血压人群中宠物饲养与生存情况
J Hypertens. 2017 Apr;35(4):769-775. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001214.
3
Liminal homes: Older people, loss of capacities, and the present future of living spaces.临界家园:老年人、能力丧失与居住空间的当下未来
J Aging Stud. 2016 Apr;37:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
4
Dog Walking, the Human-Animal Bond and Older Adults' Physical Health.遛狗、人与动物的关系和老年人的身体健康。
Gerontologist. 2017 Oct 1;57(5):930-939. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw051.
5
Patterns and causes of health inequalities in later life: a Bourdieusian approach.晚年健康不平等的模式与成因:一种布迪厄主义方法
Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Jan;37(1):143-60. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12187.
6
Does owning a pet protect older people against loneliness?养宠物能保护老年人免受孤独之苦吗?
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Sep 20;14:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-106.
7
Critical perspectives on successful aging: does it "appeal more than it illuminates"?关于成功老龄化的批判性观点:它“吸引人多于启发性”吗?
Gerontologist. 2015 Feb;55(1):26-33. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu027. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
8
Public health ethics and a status for pets as person-things : revisiting the place of animals in urbanized societies.公共卫生伦理与宠物作为“人-物”的地位:重新审视动物在城市化社会中的地位。
J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Dec;10(4):485-95. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9478-z. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
9
Dog-walking and sense of community in neighborhoods: implications for promoting regular physical activity in adults 50 years and older.遛狗与社区意识:对促进 50 岁及以上成年人进行有规律身体活动的启示
Health Place. 2013 Jul;22:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
10
Pet ownership and older women: the relationships among loneliness, pet attachment support, human social support, and depressed mood.宠物拥有与老年女性:孤独感、宠物依恋支持、人类社会支持和抑郁情绪之间的关系。
Geriatr Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

“仅仅是被允许进入”:为低收入的老年群体及其伴侣动物敞开大门。

'Simply to be let in': opening the doors to lower-income older adults and their companion animals.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Novel Tech Ethics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Sep 1;40(3):661-665. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx111.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdx111
PMID:28977402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6166583/
Abstract

Inspired by poet J.L. Borges's intimations on acceptance, this commentary highlights the eviction of an older woman and her kitten from an affordable independent living facility as representing exclusionary practices and policies that compromise the ability for some lower-income older adults to age-in-place. Even as efforts to promote aging-in-place have prioritized housing as a key need, and public health evidence suggests benefits from animal companionship later in life, there is a shortage of social and other types of affordable housing in Canada and elsewhere that allows older adult tenants to reside independently with companion animals. Within the private housing market, however, companion animals may be leveraged as a marketing tactic, with 'pets' being welcomed into rental arrangements. In light of this means-patterned discrepancy, this commentary troubles the persistent undervaluing of human-animal relationships that exists at policy and practice levels. Furthermore, banning companion animals from affordable housing subsumes an accepted yet insidious practise of regulating the lives of older adults who have not achieved idealized conceptions of responsible aging, including home ownership. We draw these two concerns together by advocating for adequate provision of affordable housing opportunities where lower-income older adults may be granted the choice to establish a home that includes a companion animal as they age-in-place.

摘要

受诗人豪尔赫·路易斯·博尔赫斯(Jorge Luis Borges)关于接受的暗示启发,本篇评论突出了一位老年妇女和她的小猫被逐出经济适用的独立生活设施的事件,这代表了排他性的做法和政策,这些做法和政策损害了一些低收入老年人就地养老的能力。尽管为促进就地养老所做的努力已将住房作为一项关键需求,并提供了晚年与动物伴侣相伴的公共卫生方面的证据,但加拿大和其他地方仍然缺乏社会和其他类型的经济适用房,无法让老年租户独立居住并与伴侣动物一起生活。然而,在私人住房市场中,伴侣动物可能被用作营销策略,“宠物”被欢迎进入租赁安排。鉴于这种手段模式的差异,本篇评论对政策和实践层面上持续存在的低估人类与动物关系的问题提出了质疑。此外,将伴侣动物禁止在经济适用房内居住,这种做法包含了一种可接受但又阴险的做法,即对那些尚未达到理想化的负责任老龄化观念(包括拥有住房)的老年人的生活进行监管。我们通过倡导提供足够的经济适用房机会,将这两个问题联系在一起,让低收入的老年人可以选择建立一个包括伴侣动物的家,从而实现就地养老。