Suppr超能文献

重症监护后的就业、社会依赖与重返工作岗位

Employment, social dependency and return to work after intensive care.

作者信息

Quasim Tara, Brown Judith, Kinsella John

机构信息

Academic Unit of Anaesthesia, Pain & Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Healthy Working Lives Group, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Soc. 2015 Feb;16(1):31-36. doi: 10.1177/1751143714556238. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

Abstract

Quality of life is an important measure of outcome in intensive care survivors. As return to employment is a key determinant of quality of life, we performed a prospective observational, cohort study of 75 intensive care unit patients who survived to hospital discharge. Approximately 2 years after intensive care unit discharge, 64% (18/28) of those employed before intensive care unit had returned to work. Of the rest, 10 were not working, two were unemployed, one was temporarily sick and seven were permanently sick. When health utility scores were assessed in the various employment categories, quality of life was particularly poor in the unemployed and permanently sick with median (interquartile range) scores of 0.082(-0.045-0.665) and 0.053(-0.160-0.769) respectively. Of the retired population, 95% returned to their own home with 50% requiring a family member to act as their carer. This study has demonstrated that patients who returned to work after a critical illness had a better quality of life at follow up, compared to the unemployed and permanently sick. In addition, there may be a burden on family members who act as carers for their relatives on discharge from hospital after a critical illness. Further work is required in this important area.

摘要

生活质量是重症监护幸存者预后的一项重要衡量指标。由于重返工作岗位是生活质量的关键决定因素,我们对75名存活至出院的重症监护病房患者进行了一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。在重症监护病房出院约2年后,重症监护病房之前就业的患者中有64%(18/28)已重返工作岗位。其余患者中,10人未工作,2人失业,1人暂时生病,7人长期患病。当对不同就业类别的健康效用评分进行评估时,失业者和长期患病者的生活质量尤其差,中位数(四分位间距)评分分别为0.082(-0.045-0.665)和0.053(-0.160-0.769)。在退休人群中,95%回到了自己家中,50%需要家庭成员作为照顾者。这项研究表明,与失业者和长期患病者相比,危重症后重返工作岗位的患者在随访时生活质量更好。此外,对于在危重症出院后照顾亲属的家庭成员来说,可能存在负担。在这一重要领域还需要进一步开展工作。

相似文献

1
Employment, social dependency and return to work after intensive care.重症监护后的就业、社会依赖与重返工作岗位
J Intensive Care Soc. 2015 Feb;16(1):31-36. doi: 10.1177/1751143714556238. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

5
The Covid-19 pandemic seen from the frontline.从一线视角看新冠疫情。
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Jul;46(suppl.1):181-194. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.S123.
7
Impact of a pharmacist intervention at an intensive care rehabilitation clinic.药剂师干预对重症监护康复诊所的影响。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Sep 27;8(3):e000580. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000580. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Do labour market status transitions predict changes in psychological well-being?劳动力市场地位转变是否预示着心理健康状况的变化?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Sep;67(9):796-802. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202425. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
9
Long-term physical outcome in patients with septic shock.感染性休克患者的长期身体转归
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Jul;53(6):724-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01921.x. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验