• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉丁美洲六个国家的医学生对Sci-Hub科学贡献的使用、了解及认知情况研究

Use, knowledge, and perception of the scientific contribution of Sci-Hub in medical students: Study in six countries in Latin America.

作者信息

Mejia Christian R, Valladares-Garrido Mario J, Miñan-Tapia Armando, Serrano Felipe T, Tobler-Gómez Liz E, Pereda-Castro William, Mendoza-Flores Cynthia R, Mundaca-Manay Maria Y, Valladares-Garrido Danai

机构信息

Escuela de Medicina Humana, Universidad Continental, Huancayo, Perú.

Escuela de Postgrado, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego, Trujillo, Perú.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 5;12(10):e0185673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185673. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0185673
PMID:28982181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5628842/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sci-Hub is a useful web portal for people working in science as it provides access to millions of free scientific articles. Satisfaction and usage should be explored in the Latino student population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use, knowledge, and perception of the scientific contribution of Sci-Hub in medical students from Latin America.

METHODOLOGY

A multicenter, observational, analytical study was conducted in 6632 medical students from 6 countries in Latin America. We surveyed from a previously validated instrument, delving into knowledge, monthly average usage, satisfaction level, and perception of the scientific contributions provided by Sci-Hub. Frequencies and percentages are described, and generalized linear models were used to establish statistical associations.

RESULTS

Only 19.2% of study participants knew of Sci-Hub and its function, while the median use was twice a month. 29.9% of Sci-Hub-aware participants claimed they always find the desired scientific information in their Sci-Hub search; 62.5% of participants affirmed that Sci-Hub contributes to scientific investigation; only 2.2% reported that Sci-Hub does not contribute to science.

CONCLUSION

The majority of Latino students are not aware of Sci-Hub.

摘要

引言

对科研工作者而言，Sci-Hub是一个实用的网络平台，它提供对数以百万计的免费科学文章的访问权限。拉丁裔学生群体对其的满意度和使用情况值得探究。本研究的目的是评估拉丁美洲医学生对Sci-Hub的使用情况、了解程度以及对其科学贡献的认知。

方法

对来自拉丁美洲6个国家的6632名医学生开展了一项多中心、观察性分析研究。我们使用一份先前经过验证的工具进行调查，深入了解对Sci-Hub的了解程度、月平均使用情况、满意度水平以及对其提供的科学贡献的认知。描述了频率和百分比，并使用广义线性模型建立统计关联。

结果

只有19.2%的研究参与者知晓Sci-Hub及其功能，而使用频率的中位数是每月两次。在知晓Sci-Hub的参与者中，29.9%声称他们在Sci-Hub搜索中总能找到所需的科学信息；62.5%的参与者肯定Sci-Hub对科学研究有帮助；只有2.2%的人报告说Sci-Hub对科学没有帮助。

结论

大多数拉丁裔学生并不知晓Sci-Hub。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3de/5628842/e251bdcdc3ac/pone.0185673.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3de/5628842/e251bdcdc3ac/pone.0185673.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3de/5628842/e251bdcdc3ac/pone.0185673.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Use, knowledge, and perception of the scientific contribution of Sci-Hub in medical students: Study in six countries in Latin America.拉丁美洲六个国家的医学生对Sci-Hub科学贡献的使用、了解及认知情况研究
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 5;12(10):e0185673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185673. eCollection 2017.
2
Association between the use of Sci-Hub and consultation of scientific journals by medical students from six Latin American countries: A secondary analysis.六个拉丁美洲国家医学生使用Sci-Hub与查阅科学期刊之间的关联：一项二次分析
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 5;9(8):e17868. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17868. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Factors associated with producing a scientific publication during medical training: evidence from a cross-sectional study of 40 medical schools in Latin America.医学培训期间发表科学出版物的相关因素：来自拉丁美洲40所医学院校横断面研究的证据
F1000Res. 2020 Nov 24;9:1365. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26596.2. eCollection 2020.
4
Motivation towards medical career choice and academic performance in Latin American medical students: A cross-sectional study.拉美医学生选择医学职业的动机和学业表现：一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205674. eCollection 2018.
5
How much do Latin American medical students know about radiology? Latin-American multicenter cross-sectional study.拉丁美洲医学生对放射学了解多少？拉丁美洲多中心横断面研究。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2173044. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2173044.
6
Gender Associated with the Intention to Choose a Medical Specialty in Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in 11 Countries in Latin America.医学生选择医学专业意向与性别的关联：拉丁美洲11个国家的横断面研究
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 12;11(8):e0161000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161000. eCollection 2016.
7
Open Access Redefined: Survey Data and Literature Study on the Impact of Sci-Hub in Orthopaedic Research.开放获取的重新定义：Sci-Hub 在骨科研究中的影响的调查数据和文献研究。
Z Orthop Unfall. 2023 Dec;161(6):648-653. doi: 10.1055/a-1773-1268. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
8
Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study).拉丁美洲空气污染与死亡率的多城市研究（ESCALA研究）。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Oct(171):5-86.
9
Knowledge, Perceptions, and Practices on Risks and Disasters Among Medical Students. A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in 9 Latin American and Caribbean Countries.医学生对风险和灾害的认知、观念及实践。一项在9个拉丁美洲和加勒比国家开展的多中心横断面研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Mar 14;14:225-235. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S394331. eCollection 2023.
10
Differences on Primary Care Labor Perceptions in Medical Students from 11 Latin American Countries.11个拉丁美洲国家医学生对基层医疗工作看法的差异
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0159147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159147. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between the use of Sci-Hub and consultation of scientific journals by medical students from six Latin American countries: A secondary analysis.六个拉丁美洲国家医学生使用Sci-Hub与查阅科学期刊之间的关联：一项二次分析
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 5;9(8):e17868. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17868. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Understanding the study habits of Saudi residents in a psychiatry programme.了解沙特精神病学项目住院医师的学习习惯。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 Nov 11;16(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.10.011. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Sci-Hub and medical practice: an ethical dilemma in Peru.
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Sep;4(9):e608. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30188-7.
2
The frustrated science student behind Sci-Hub.科学共享网站背后受挫的理科生。
Science. 2016 Apr 29;352(6285):511. doi: 10.1126/science.352.6285.511.
3
Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone.谁在下载盗版论文？所有人。
Science. 2016 Apr 29;352(6285):508-12. doi: 10.1126/science.352.6285.508. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
Sci-Hub 提供几乎所有学术文献的访问途径。
Elife. 2018 Mar 1;7:e32822. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32822.
4
My love-hate of Sci-Hub.
Science. 2016 Apr 29;352(6285):497. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf9419. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
5
Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014).高影响力医学期刊中女性第一作者情况的趋势与比较：观察性研究（1994 - 2014年）
BMJ. 2016 Mar 2;352:i847. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i847.
6
Gender inequality in career advancement for females in Japanese academic surgery.日本外科学术领域中女性职业发展的性别不平等问题。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2014 Nov;234(3):221-7. doi: 10.1620/tjem.234.221.
7
Women's participation in the medical profession: insights from experiences in Japan, Scandinavia, Russia, and Eastern Europe.女性在医学职业中的参与：来自日本、斯堪的纳维亚、俄罗斯和东欧经验的见解。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Nov;23(11):927-34. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4736. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
The gender imbalance in academic medicine: a study of female authorship in the United Kingdom.学术医学领域的性别失衡：对英国女性作者身份的一项研究。
J R Soc Med. 2009 Aug;102(8):337-42. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.080378.
9
The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature--a 35-year perspective.学术医学文献作者身份中的“性别差距”——35年的视角
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 20;355(3):281-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa053910.
10
[The use of bibliographic databases by Spanish-speaking Latin American biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study].[西班牙语拉丁美洲生物医学研究人员对文献数据库的使用：一项横断面研究]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005 Apr;17(4):230-6. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892005000400003.