• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

六个拉丁美洲国家医学生使用Sci-Hub与查阅科学期刊之间的关联:一项二次分析

Association between the use of Sci-Hub and consultation of scientific journals by medical students from six Latin American countries: A secondary analysis.

作者信息

Valladares-Garrido Mario J, Serrano Felipe T, Rios-González Carlos Miguel, Pedersini Paolo, Villafañe Jorge Hugo, Franchi Thomas, Tovani-Palone Marcos Roberto, Mejia Christian R

机构信息

Universidad Continental, Lima, Peru.

Oficina de Epidemiología, Hospital Regional Lambayeque, Lambayeque, Peru.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Jul 5;9(8):e17868. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17868. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17868
PMID:37600382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10432966/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Sci-Hub is a website that allows users to download full-text versions of millions of scientific articles for free. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the use of Sci-Hub and consultation of scientific journals by medical students from six Latin American countries.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a 2017 cross-sectional study of medical students from six Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay, and Peru). Consultation of scientific journals was considered as the dependent variable, while the independent variable was the use of Sci-Hub. Responses were categorized as: "do not know"; "did not use it"; "used it at least once a week"; "used it more than once a week"; and "used it every day of the month". In simple and multiple regression analyses, multivariate random-effects models were used to estimate prevalence ratios (PR), with 95% confident intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Of the 6632 participants, 38.2% consulted scientific journals and 10.3% used Sci-Hub once a week. Using Sci-Hub at least once a week was associated with a 20% increase in the prevalence of consulting scientific journals (PR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10-1.31,  < 0.001). The variables positively associated with Sci-Hub use included being in the sixth year of medical school (PR: 2.34), affiliation to more than one academic research group (PR: 1.81), being a medical student in Colombia (PR: 1.63), intermediate (PR: 1.16) and advanced levels of English (PR: 1.23), and daily use of PubMed (PR: 1.66), SciELO (PR: 1.87), and/or SCOPUS (PR: 1.58).

CONCLUSION

Amongst medical students surveyed from the above six Latin American countries, the use of Sci-Hub at least once a week was significantly associated with the self-reported prevalence of consulting scientific journals.

摘要

引言与目的

Sci-Hub是一个允许用户免费下载数百万篇科学文章全文版本的网站。本研究的目的是评估来自六个拉丁美洲国家的医学生使用Sci-Hub与查阅科学期刊之间的关联。

方法

我们对2017年一项针对来自六个拉丁美洲国家(阿根廷、玻利维亚、智利、哥伦比亚、巴拉圭和秘鲁)医学生的横断面研究数据进行了二次分析。查阅科学期刊被视为因变量,而自变量是Sci-Hub的使用情况。回答被分类为:“不知道”;“未使用过”;“每周至少使用一次”;“每周使用不止一次”;以及“每月每天都使用”。在简单和多元回归分析中,使用多元随机效应模型来估计患病率比(PR),并给出95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在6632名参与者中,38.2%的人查阅科学期刊,10.3%的人每周使用一次Sci-Hub。每周至少使用一次Sci-Hub与查阅科学期刊的患病率增加20%相关(PR:1.20,95%CI:1.10 - 1.31,<0.001)。与使用Sci-Hub呈正相关的变量包括处于医学院六年级(PR:2.34)、隶属于不止一个学术研究小组(PR:1.81)、是哥伦比亚的医学生(PR:1.63)、英语水平中级(PR:1.16)和高级(PR:1.23),以及每天使用PubMed(PR:1.66)、SciELO(PR:1.87)和/或SCOPUS(PR:1.58)。

结论

在上述六个拉丁美洲国家接受调查的医学生中,每周至少使用一次Sci-Hub与自我报告的查阅科学期刊的患病率显著相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/10432966/a7c7dc65e426/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/10432966/a7c7dc65e426/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/10432966/a7c7dc65e426/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between the use of Sci-Hub and consultation of scientific journals by medical students from six Latin American countries: A secondary analysis.六个拉丁美洲国家医学生使用Sci-Hub与查阅科学期刊之间的关联:一项二次分析
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 5;9(8):e17868. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17868. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Use, knowledge, and perception of the scientific contribution of Sci-Hub in medical students: Study in six countries in Latin America.拉丁美洲六个国家的医学生对Sci-Hub科学贡献的使用、了解及认知情况研究
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 5;12(10):e0185673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185673. eCollection 2017.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
[Toward a model of communications in public health in Latin America and the Caribbean].[迈向拉丁美洲和加勒比地区公共卫生通信模式]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005 Dec;18(6):427-38. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892005001000006.
5
Factors associated with producing a scientific publication during medical training: evidence from a cross-sectional study of 40 medical schools in Latin America.医学培训期间发表科学出版物的相关因素:来自拉丁美洲40所医学院校横断面研究的证据
F1000Res. 2020 Nov 24;9:1365. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26596.2. eCollection 2020.
6
How much do Latin American medical students know about radiology? Latin-American multicenter cross-sectional study.拉丁美洲医学生对放射学了解多少?拉丁美洲多中心横断面研究。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2173044. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2173044.
7
Motivation towards medical career choice and academic performance in Latin American medical students: A cross-sectional study.拉美医学生选择医学职业的动机和学业表现:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205674. eCollection 2018.
8
[The use of bibliographic databases by Spanish-speaking Latin American biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study].[西班牙语拉丁美洲生物医学研究人员对文献数据库的使用:一项横断面研究]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005 Apr;17(4):230-6. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892005000400003.
9
[Impact factor of Latin American medical journals].[拉丁美洲医学期刊的影响因子]
Rev Med Chil. 2007 Apr;135(4):480-7. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872007000400010. Epub 2007 May 16.
10
[Production of scientific articles about health in six Latin American countries, 1973-1992].[1973年至1992年六个拉丁美洲国家关于健康的科学文章产出]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 1997 Jan;1(1):23-34.

本文引用的文献

1
[Sci-Hub, critical thinking and beyond good and evil].[科学上网、批判性思维与超越善恶]
Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80(3):313-314.
2
[Scientific communication and the social practice of writing].[科学传播与写作的社会实践]
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2018 Jan-Mar;50(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2018.01.005.
3
Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature.Sci-Hub 提供几乎所有学术文献的访问途径。
Elife. 2018 Mar 1;7:e32822. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32822.
4
Gold open access: the best of both worlds.金色开放获取:两全其美。
Neth Heart J. 2018 Jan;26(1):3-4. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1064-2.
5
[Publication in students' scientific journals. Is it the answer to undergaduates on where to publish their work?].[发表于学生科学期刊。这是本科生关于其作品发表去向问题的答案吗?]
Rev Med Chil. 2017 Jun;145(6):819-820. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872017000600819.
6
Use, knowledge, and perception of the scientific contribution of Sci-Hub in medical students: Study in six countries in Latin America.拉丁美洲六个国家的医学生对Sci-Hub科学贡献的使用、了解及认知情况研究
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 5;12(10):e0185673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185673. eCollection 2017.
7
Science communication at scientific societies.科学学会的科学传播。
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Oct;70:85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
8
Scientific elevator speeches: a communication and critical thinking tool.科学电梯演讲:一种沟通与批判性思维工具。
Med Educ. 2017 May;51(5):559. doi: 10.1111/medu.13321.
9
Gender-Specific Determinants and Patterns of Online Health Information Seeking: Results From a Representative German Health Survey.在线健康信息搜索的性别特异性决定因素及模式:一项具有代表性的德国健康调查结果
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 4;19(4):e92. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6668.
10
Sci-Hub: What Librarians Should Know and Do about Article Piracy.科学-学术资源共享网站(Sci-Hub):图书馆员应了解和应对的文章盗版问题。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2017 Jan-Mar;36(1):73-78. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1259918.