• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report.通过有效沟通解决系统综述团队面临的挑战:案例报告。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):643-647. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1222.
2
Adopting a toolkit to manage time, resources, and expectations in the systematic review process: a case report.采用工具包管理系统评价过程中的时间、资源和预期:案例报告。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):637-642. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1221.
3
A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews.参与系统评价的图书馆员的能力框架。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):268-275. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.189. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
4
The systematic review team: contributions of the health sciences librarian.系统评价团队:健康科学图书馆员的贡献
Med Ref Serv Q. 2011;30(3):301-15. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2011.590425.
5
Collaboration challenges in systematic reviews: a survey of health sciences librarians.系统评价中的合作挑战:对健康科学图书馆员的一项调查
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Oct;105(4):385-393. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.176. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
The academic librarian as co-investigator on an interprofessional primary research team: a case study.学术图书馆员作为跨专业初级研究团队的共同研究者:一项案例研究
Health Info Libr J. 2014 Jun;31(2):116-22. doi: 10.1111/hir.12063. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
8
Graduate student confidence following a for-credit systematic review course pilot.研究生在学分制系统评价课程试点后的信心。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 1;109(2):323-329. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1073.
9
Large-scale systematic review support for guideline development in diabetes precision medicine.大规模系统综述支持糖尿病精准医学指南制定。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Jul 1;112(3):275-280. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1863. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
10
Librarians as Part of Cross-Disciplinary, Multi-Institutional Team Projects: Experiences from the VIVO Collaboration.图书馆员作为跨学科、多机构团队项目的一部分:来自VIVO合作项目的经验
Sci Technol Libr (New York, NY). 2013;32(2):160-175. doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2013.791183.

引用本文的文献

1
Large-scale systematic review support for guideline development in diabetes precision medicine.大规模系统综述支持糖尿病精准医学指南制定。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Jul 1;112(3):275-280. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1863. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Bibliometric analysis of librarian involvement in systematic reviews at the University of Alberta.阿尔伯塔大学图书馆员参与系统评价的文献计量分析。
J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;45(1):16-29. doi: 10.29173/jchla29696. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
TFOS Lifestyle - Evidence quality report: Advancing the evaluation and synthesis of research evidence.TFOS 生活方式 - 证据质量报告:推进研究证据的评估和综合。
Ocul Surf. 2023 Apr;28:200-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
4
Adopting a toolkit to manage time, resources, and expectations in the systematic review process: a case report.采用工具包管理系统评价过程中的时间、资源和预期:案例报告。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):637-642. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1221.

本文引用的文献

1
Adopting a toolkit to manage time, resources, and expectations in the systematic review process: a case report.采用工具包管理系统评价过程中的时间、资源和预期:案例报告。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):637-642. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1221.
2
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
3
It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks.这比你想象的要花更长时间:图书馆员在系统评价任务上花费的时间。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Apr;106(2):198-207. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.323. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
4
Collaboration challenges in systematic reviews: a survey of health sciences librarians.系统评价中的合作挑战:对健康科学图书馆员的一项调查
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Oct;105(4):385-393. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.176. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
5
Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews.灰色文献:系统评价中的重要资源。
J Evid Based Med. 2017 Aug;10(3):233-240. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12266.
6
A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews.参与系统评价的图书馆员的能力框架。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):268-275. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.189. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
7
Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry.利用PROSPERO注册库的数据,分析对医学干预措施进行系统评价所需的时间和人员。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 27;7(2):e012545. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545.
8
Systematic review automation technologies.系统评价自动化技术。
Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 9;3:74. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-74.
9
Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions.系统评价医疗干预措施的系统评价的方法学。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Feb 3;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-15.
10
PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目声明
Epidemiology. 2011 Jan;22(1):128; author reply 128. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181fe7825.

通过有效沟通解决系统综述团队面临的挑战:案例报告。

Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):643-647. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1222.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2021.1222
PMID:34858096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8608185/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Every step in the systematic review process has challenges, ranging from resistance by review teams to adherence to standard methodology to low-energy commitment to full participation. These challenges can derail the project and result in significant delays, duplication of work, and failure to complete the review. Communication during the systematic review process is key to ensuring it runs smoothly and is identified as a core competency for librarians involved in systematic reviews.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case report presents effective communication approaches that our librarians employ to address challenges encountered while working with systematic review teams. The communication strategies we describe engage teams through information, questions, and action items and lead to productive collaborations with publishable systematic reviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective communication with review teams keeps systematic review projects moving forward. The techniques covered in this case study strive to minimize misunderstandings, educate collaborators, and, in our experience, have led to multiple successful collaborations and publications. Librarians working in the systematic review space will recognize these challenges and can adapt these techniques to their own environments.

摘要

背景

系统评价过程中的每一个步骤都面临着挑战,从评审团队的抵制到对标准方法的坚持,再到对全面参与的低能量承诺。这些挑战可能会使项目脱轨,并导致重大延误、工作重复以及无法完成审查。系统评价过程中的沟通是确保其顺利进行的关键,并且被确定为参与系统评价的图书馆员的核心能力之一。

案例介绍

本案例报告介绍了我们的图书馆员在与系统评价团队合作时采用的有效沟通方法,以解决遇到的挑战。我们描述的沟通策略通过信息、问题和行动项目来吸引团队,并与可发表的系统评价进行富有成效的合作。

结论

与评审团队的有效沟通使系统评价项目得以顺利进行。本案例研究中涵盖的技术旨在尽量减少误解、教育合作者,并且根据我们的经验,这些技术已经促成了多次成功的合作和发表。在系统评价领域工作的图书馆员将认识到这些挑战,并能够将这些技术应用于自己的环境中。