Division of Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Medical Countermeasures, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), US Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS), Washington, District of Columbia.
Center for Health Security, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Aug 1;65(3):495-500. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix320.
Due to increasing rates of antimicrobial-resistant infections and the current inadequacy of the antibiotic pipeline, there is increasing interest in nontraditional approaches to antibacterial therapies. We define "traditional" agents as small-molecule agents that directly target bacterial components to exert a bacteriostatic or bactericidal effect, and "nontraditional approaches" as antimicrobial therapeutics that work through other means (ie, not a small molecule and/or utilizes a nontraditional target). Due to their atypical features, such therapies may be less susceptible to the emergence of resistance than traditional antibiotics. They include approaches such as monoclonal antibodies, virulence disruptors, immunomodulators, phage therapies, microbiome-based therapies, antibiotic potentiators, and antisense approaches. This article discusses both the developmental and regulatory advantages and challenges associated with each of these technologies. By identifying existing regulatory and developmental gaps, we hope to provide a sense of where focusing resources may provide the greatest impact on successful product development.
由于抗菌药物耐药感染率不断上升,而目前抗生素研发管线严重不足,人们对非传统抗菌疗法的兴趣日益增加。我们将“传统”药物定义为直接针对细菌成分以发挥抑菌或杀菌作用的小分子药物,将“非传统方法”定义为通过其他方式发挥作用的抗菌治疗药物(即不是小分子药物和/或利用非传统靶标)。由于这些疗法的非典型特征,它们可能比传统抗生素更不易产生耐药性。这些疗法包括单克隆抗体、毒力抑制剂、免疫调节剂、噬菌体疗法、基于微生物组的疗法、抗生素增效剂和反义疗法等。本文讨论了这些技术各自在开发和监管方面的优势和挑战。通过确定现有的监管和开发空白,我们希望了解集中资源的方向,以期对成功的产品开发产生最大影响。