Suppr超能文献

一种用于对暴露于层流剪切应力下的内皮细胞进行力学特性表征的平行板流动腔室。

A Parallel-Plate Flow Chamber for Mechanical Characterization of Endothelial Cells Exposed to Laminar Shear Stress.

作者信息

Wong Andrew K, LLanos Pierre, Boroda Nickolas, Rosenberg Seth R, Rabbany Sina Y

机构信息

Bioengineering Program, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, 11549.

Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065.

出版信息

Cell Mol Bioeng. 2016 Mar;9(1):127-138. doi: 10.1007/s12195-015-0424-5. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

Abstract

Shear stresses induced by laminar fluid flow are essential to properly recapitulate the physiological microenvironment experienced by endothelial cells (ECs). ECs respond to these stresses via mechanotransduction by modulating their phenotype and biomechanical characteristics, which can be characterized by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Parallel Plate Flow Chambers (PPFCs) apply unidirectional laminar fluid flow to EC monolayers . Since ECs in sealed PPFCs are inaccessible to AFM probes, cone-and-plate viscometers (CPs) are commonly used to apply shear stress. This paper presents a comparison of the efficacies of both methods. Computational Fluid Dynamic simulation and validation testing using EC responses as a metric have indicated limitations in the use of CPs to apply laminar shear stress. Monolayers subjected to laminar fluid flow in a PPFC respond by increasing cortical stiffness, elongating, and aligning filamentous actin in the direction of fluid flow to a greater extent than CP devices. Limitations using CP devices to provide laminar flow across an EC monolayer suggest they are better suited when studying EC response for disturbed flow conditions. PPFC platforms allow for exposure of ECs to laminar fluid flow conditions, recapitulating cellular biomechanical behaviors, whereas CP platforms allow for mechanical characterization of ECs under secondary flow.

摘要

层流引起的剪切应力对于准确重现内皮细胞(ECs)所经历的生理微环境至关重要。内皮细胞通过机械转导对这些应力做出反应,调节其表型和生物力学特性,这可以通过原子力显微镜(AFM)进行表征。平行板流动腔(PPFCs)将单向层流应用于内皮细胞单层。由于密封的PPFCs中的内皮细胞无法被AFM探针触及,通常使用锥板粘度计(CPs)来施加剪切应力。本文对这两种方法进行了效能比较。使用内皮细胞反应作为指标的计算流体动力学模拟和验证测试表明,使用CPs施加层流剪切应力存在局限性。与CP设备相比,在PPFC中受到层流作用的单层细胞通过增加皮质硬度、伸长并使丝状肌动蛋白沿流体流动方向排列做出更大程度的反应。使用CP设备在整个内皮细胞单层上提供层流存在局限性,这表明它们更适合用于研究内皮细胞对紊乱流动条件的反应。PPFC平台允许内皮细胞暴露于层流条件下,重现细胞生物力学行为,而CP平台允许在内皮细胞处于二次流动的情况下对其进行力学表征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1da/5629975/b6ae0a923b25/nihms904509f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验