• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

啄羊鹦鹉和新喀里多尼亚乌鸦物体探索的功能与灵活性

Function and flexibility of object exploration in kea and New Caledonian crows.

作者信息

Lambert Megan L, Schiestl Martina, Schwing Raoul, Taylor Alex H, Gajdon Gyula K, Slocombe Katie E, Seed Amanda M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.

Department of Cognitive Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Sep 27;4(9):170652. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170652. eCollection 2017 Sep.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.170652
PMID:28989768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5627108/
Abstract

A range of non-human animals frequently manipulate and explore objects in their environment, which may enable them to learn about physical properties and potentially form more abstract concepts of properties such as weight and rigidity. Whether animals can apply the information learned during their exploration to solve novel problems, however, and whether they actually change their exploratory behaviour to seek functional information about objects have not been fully explored. We allowed kea () and New Caledonian crows () to explore sets of novel objects both before and after encountering a task in which some of the objects could function as tools. Following this, subjects were given test trials in which they could choose among the objects they had explored to solve a tool-use task. Several individuals from both species performed above chance on these test trials, and only did so after exploring the objects, compared with a control experiment with no prior exploration phase. These results suggest that selection of functional tools may be guided by information acquired during exploration. Neither kea nor crows changed the duration or quality of their exploration after learning that the objects had a functional relevance, suggesting that birds do not adjust their behaviour to explicitly seek this information.

摘要

一系列非人类动物经常在其环境中操纵和探索物体,这可能使它们了解物理属性,并有可能形成诸如重量和硬度等属性的更抽象概念。然而,动物是否能应用在探索过程中学到的信息来解决新问题,以及它们是否真的改变探索行为以寻求有关物体的功能信息,尚未得到充分研究。我们让啄羊鹦鹉(kea)和新喀里多尼亚乌鸦(New Caledonian crows)在遇到一些物体可作为工具的任务之前和之后,探索几组新物体。在此之后,对实验对象进行测试试验,在试验中它们可以从自己探索过的物体中进行选择,以解决工具使用任务。与没有前期探索阶段的对照实验相比,两个物种的几只个体在这些测试试验中的表现都高于随机水平,而且只有在探索过物体之后才做到这一点。这些结果表明,功能性工具的选择可能受探索过程中获取的信息指导。在得知物体具有功能相关性后,啄羊鹦鹉和乌鸦都没有改变它们探索的持续时间或质量,这表明鸟类不会调整其行为以明确寻求此信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de07/5627108/984f8e177bf3/rsos170652-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de07/5627108/fac115a6d8d9/rsos170652-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de07/5627108/d47b79b8ec4f/rsos170652-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de07/5627108/e52970a1f0ed/rsos170652-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de07/5627108/984f8e177bf3/rsos170652-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de07/5627108/fac115a6d8d9/rsos170652-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de07/5627108/d47b79b8ec4f/rsos170652-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de07/5627108/e52970a1f0ed/rsos170652-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de07/5627108/984f8e177bf3/rsos170652-g4.jpg

相似文献

1
Function and flexibility of object exploration in kea and New Caledonian crows.啄羊鹦鹉和新喀里多尼亚乌鸦物体探索的功能与灵活性
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Sep 27;4(9):170652. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170652. eCollection 2017 Sep.
2
A novel tool-use mode in animals: New Caledonian crows insert tools to transport objects.动物中的一种新型工具使用模式:新喀里多尼亚乌鸦插入工具来搬运物体。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Nov;19(6):1249-1252. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1016-z. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
3
On the evolutionary and ontogenetic origins of tool-oriented behaviour in New Caledonian crows ().新喀里多尼亚乌鸦面向工具行为的进化与个体发育起源()
Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2011 Apr 1;102(4):870-877. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01613.x.
4
New Caledonian crows use tools for non-foraging activities.新喀鸦会将工具用于非觅食活动。
Anim Cogn. 2011 May;14(3):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0366-1. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
5
New Caledonian crows infer the weight of objects from observing their movements in a breeze.新喀鸦通过观察物体在微风中的运动来推断其重量。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jan 16;286(1894):20182332. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2332.
6
Flexibility in problem solving and tool use of kea and New Caledonian crows in a multi access box paradigm.在多通道箱范式中,啄羊鹦鹉和新喀里多尼亚乌鸦在解决问题和使用工具方面的灵活性。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020231. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
7
Performance in Object-Choice Aesop's Fable Tasks Are Influenced by Object Biases in New Caledonian Crows but not in Human Children.新喀里多尼亚乌鸦在目标选择伊索寓言任务中的表现受目标偏好影响,而人类儿童则不受此影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0168056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168056. eCollection 2016.
8
Cognitive processes associated with sequential tool use in New Caledonian crows.与新喀里多尼亚乌鸦连续使用工具相关的认知过程。
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 5;4(8):e6471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006471.
9
New Caledonian crows learn the functional properties of novel tool types.新喀鸦学习新型工具的功能特性。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e26887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026887. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
10
Object caching in corvids: incidence and significance.鸦科动物的物体缓存行为:发生率及意义
Behav Processes. 2014 Feb;102:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Goffin's cockatoos use object mass but not balance cues when making object transport decisions.戈芬氏凤头鹦鹉在进行物体搬运决策时会使用物体质量而不是平衡线索。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;14(1):27265. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76104-7.
2
Do kea parrots infer the weight of objects from their movement in a breeze?大斑鹦鹉能否根据物体在微风中的运动来推断其重量?
Biol Lett. 2024 Nov;20(11):20240405. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0405. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
3
Do Nonhumans Seek Explanations?非人类会寻求解释吗?

本文引用的文献

1
Does absolute brain size really predict self-control? Hand-tracking training improves performance on the A-not-B task.绝对脑容量真的能预测自我控制能力吗?手部追踪训练可提高在A非B任务中的表现。
Biol Lett. 2016 Feb;12(2):20150871. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0871.
2
A novel form of spontaneous tool use displayed by several captive greater vasa parrots (Coracopsis vasa).几种圈养大维塔式鹦鹉(Coracopsis vasa)表现出的一种新颖的自发性工具使用形式。
Biol Lett. 2015 Dec;11(12):20150861. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0861.
3
Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use.
Anim Behav Cogn. 2020 Aug 1;7(3):445-451. doi: 10.26451/abc.07.03.10.2020.
4
Ratcheting up tool innovation in Goffin's cockatoos (): The effect of contextually diverse prior experience.提升戈氏凤头鹦鹉的工具创新能力:情境多样的先前经验的影响
Ethology. 2023 Mar;129(3):133-145. doi: 10.1111/eth.13351. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
5
Recent developments in parrot cognition: a quadrennial update.最近鹦鹉认知能力的发展:四年一度的更新。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):199-228. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01733-2. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
6
Self-care tooling innovation in a disabled kea (Nestor notabilis).自我护理工具创新在残疾鸮鹦鹉(Nestor notabilis)中。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 10;11(1):18035. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97086-w.
7
Goffin's cockatoos discriminate objects based on weight alone.戈芬氏凤头鹦鹉仅根据重量来区分物体。
Biol Lett. 2021 Sep;17(9):20210250. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0250. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
8
Extending the Reach of Tooling Theory: A Neurocognitive and Phylogenetic Perspective.拓展工具理论的应用范围:神经认知和系统发生学视角。
Top Cogn Sci. 2021 Oct;13(4):548-572. doi: 10.1111/tops.12554. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
9
Kea (Nestor notabilis) show flexibility and individuality in within-session reversal learning tasks.黄眼企鹅(Nestor notabilis)在单次会话的反转学习任务中表现出灵活性和个体性。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Nov;24(6):1339-1351. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01524-1. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
10
Learning about construction behaviour from observing an artefact: can experience with conspecifics aid in artefact recognition?从观察制品中学习建造行为:同种个体经验能否有助于制品识别?
Anim Cogn. 2021 Nov;24(6):1267-1277. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01519-y. Epub 2021 May 6.
黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩在使用工具的内在动机方面存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 16;5:11356. doi: 10.1038/srep11356.
4
Unrewarded Object Combinations in Captive Parrots.圈养鹦鹉中无奖励的物体组合
Anim Behav Cogn. 2014 Nov 1;1(4):470-488. doi: 10.12966/abc.11.05.2014.
5
On the evolutionary and ontogenetic origins of tool-oriented behaviour in New Caledonian crows ().新喀里多尼亚乌鸦面向工具行为的进化与个体发育起源()
Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2011 Apr 1;102(4):870-877. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01613.x.
6
Combinatory actions during object play in psittaciformes (Diopsittaca nobilis, Pionites melanocephala, Cacatua goffini) and corvids (Corvus corax, C. monedula, C. moneduloides).鹦鹉目(黑头凯克鹦鹉、黑头鹦哥、戈氏凤头鹦鹉)和鸦科(渡鸦、寒鸦、小嘴乌鸦)在物体玩耍过程中的组合动作。
J Comp Psychol. 2015 Feb;129(1):62-71. doi: 10.1037/a0038314. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
7
Stimulus salience as an explanation for imperfect mimicry.刺激显著性解释了不完全模仿现象。
Curr Biol. 2014 May 5;24(9):965-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.02.061. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
8
Spontaneous innovation in tool manufacture and use in a Goffin's cockatoo.戈氏凤头鹦鹉在工具制造和使用方面的自发创新。
Curr Biol. 2012 Nov 6;22(21):R903-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.002.
9
Navigating a tool end in a specific direction: stick-tool use in kea (Nestor notabilis).在特定方向上操纵工具末端:啄羊鹦鹉(Nestor notabilis)的棍棒工具使用。
Biol Lett. 2011 Dec 23;7(6):825-8. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0388. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
10
The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology.反正弦法很愚蠢:生态学中的比例分析。
Ecology. 2011 Jan;92(1):3-10. doi: 10.1890/10-0340.1.