• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接近中心性对词汇加工的影响。

The Influence of Closeness Centrality on Lexical Processing.

作者信息

Goldstein Rutherford, Vitevitch Michael S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 26;8:1683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01683. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01683
PMID:29018396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5622968/
Abstract

The present study examined how the network science measure known as closeness centrality (which measures the average distance between a node and all other nodes in the network) influences lexical processing. In the mental lexicon, a word such as CAN has high closeness centrality, because it is close to many other words in the lexicon. Whereas, a word such as CURE has low closeness centrality because it is far from other words in the lexicon. In an auditory lexical decision task (Experiment 1) participants responded more quickly to words with high closeness centrality. In Experiment 2 an auditory lexical decision task was again used, but with a wider range of stimulus characteristics. Although, there was no main effect of closeness centrality in Experiment 2, an interaction between closeness centrality and frequency of occurrence was observed on reaction times. The results are explained in terms of partial activation gradually strengthening over time word-forms that are centrally located in the phonological network.

摘要

本研究考察了被称为接近中心性的网络科学度量(该度量衡量网络中一个节点与所有其他节点之间的平均距离)如何影响词汇加工。在心理词典中,像“CAN”这样的词具有较高的接近中心性,因为它在词典中与许多其他词接近。而像“CURE”这样的词具有较低的接近中心性,因为它在词典中与其他词距离较远。在一项听觉词汇判断任务(实验1)中,参与者对具有高接近中心性的词反应更快。在实验2中,再次使用了听觉词汇判断任务,但刺激特征范围更广。虽然在实验2中接近中心性没有主效应,但在反应时间上观察到接近中心性与出现频率之间的交互作用。结果是根据随着时间推移逐渐增强的部分激活来解释的,这种激活作用于语音网络中处于中心位置的词形。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f1/5622968/682ab7d294b6/fpsyg-08-01683-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f1/5622968/9df723a64338/fpsyg-08-01683-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f1/5622968/0f9f1afeddc9/fpsyg-08-01683-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f1/5622968/682ab7d294b6/fpsyg-08-01683-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f1/5622968/9df723a64338/fpsyg-08-01683-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f1/5622968/0f9f1afeddc9/fpsyg-08-01683-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f1/5622968/682ab7d294b6/fpsyg-08-01683-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Influence of Closeness Centrality on Lexical Processing.接近中心性对词汇加工的影响。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 26;8:1683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01683. eCollection 2017.
2
The multiplex structure of the mental lexicon influences picture naming in people with aphasia.心理词典的多重结构影响失语症患者的图片命名。
J Complex Netw. 2019 Dec;7(6):913-931. doi: 10.1093/comnet/cnz012. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
3
Do age and language impairment affect speed of recognition for words with high and low closeness centrality within the phonological network?年龄和语言障碍是否会影响语音网络中高、低接近中心度词的识别速度?
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Dec;25(6):915-928. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2141323. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Quantifying the Interplay of Semantics and Phonology During Failures of Word Retrieval by People With Aphasia Using a Multiplex Lexical Network.使用多重词汇网络量化失语症患者在单词检索失败过程中语义和音位的相互作用。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Sep;44(9):e12881. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12881.
5
Using Network Science Measures to Predict the Lexical Decision Performance of Adults Who Stutter.运用网络科学方法预测口吃成年人的词汇判断表现。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jul 12;60(7):1911-1918. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0298.
6
Spoken word recognition and serial recall of words from components in the phonological network.语音网络中成分的单词口语识别和系列回忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Mar;42(3):394-410. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000139. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
7
Distance Entropy Cartography Characterises Centrality in Complex Networks.距离熵制图法表征复杂网络中的中心性。
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Apr 11;20(4):268. doi: 10.3390/e20040268.
8
Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.对正常和听力受损听众的邻域激活理论的检验。
Ear Hear. 2001 Feb;22(1):1-13. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200102000-00001.
9
Orthographic consistency and word-frequency effects in auditory word recognition: new evidence from lexical decision and rime detection.正字法一致性和词频效应对听觉词汇识别的影响:来自词汇判断和押韵检测的新证据。
Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 19;2:263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00263. eCollection 2011.
10
There Goes the Neighborhood: Lipreading and the Structure of the Mental Lexicon.邻里关系不再:唇读与心理词汇的结构
Speech Commun. 2011 Feb;53(2):220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2010.09.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Open-access network science: Investigating phonological similarity networks based on the SUBTLEX-US lexicon.开放获取网络科学:基于SUBTLEX-US词库研究语音相似性网络。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Feb 18;57(3):96. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02610-9.
2
The Self-Information Weighting-Based Node Importance Ranking Method for Graph Data.基于自信息加权的图数据节点重要性排序方法
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Oct 15;24(10):1471. doi: 10.3390/e24101471.
3
The Structure Entropy-Based Node Importance Ranking Method for Graph Data.基于结构熵的图数据节点重要性排序方法

本文引用的文献

1
Using network science in the language sciences and clinic.将网络科学应用于语言科学与临床领域。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Feb;17(1):13-25. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2014.987819. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
2
The influence of clustering coefficient on word-learning: how groups of similar sounding words facilitate acquisition.聚类系数对词汇学习的影响:发音相似的单词组如何促进习得。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 18;5:1307. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01307. eCollection 2014.
3
Keywords in the mental lexicon.心理词汇中的关键词。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jun 15;25(6):941. doi: 10.3390/e25060941.
4
Identifying the phonological backbone in the mental lexicon.在心理词典中识别语音主干。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287197. eCollection 2023.
5
Using Complex Networks in the Hearing Sciences.在听力科学中使用复杂网络
Ear Hear. 2024;45(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001395. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
6
Women's Footprint in Anti-Doping Sciences: A Bibliometric Approach to Research Impact.女性在反兴奋剂科学领域的足迹:研究影响力的文献计量学方法
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 May 30;4:866648. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.866648. eCollection 2022.
7
The Challenge of Achieving Greater Generalization in Phonological Treatment of Aphasia.在失语症语音治疗中实现更高泛化性的挑战。
Aphasiology. 2022;36(2):170-197. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1856327. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
8
Differentiating Interpreting Types: Connecting Complex Networks to Cognitive Complexity.区分口译类型:将复杂网络与认知复杂性相联系。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 17;12:590399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590399. eCollection 2021.
9
Forma mentis networks map how nursing and engineering students enhance their mindsets about innovation and health during professional growth.思维模式网络描绘了护理专业和工程专业学生在职业成长过程中如何提升他们对创新和健康的思维模式。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2020 Mar 2;6:e255. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.255. eCollection 2020.
10
Investigating the Influence of Inverse Preferential Attachment on Network Development.研究反向优先连接对网络发展的影响。
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Sep 15;22(9):1029. doi: 10.3390/e22091029.
J Mem Lang. 2014 May 1;73:131-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.03.005.
4
Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory.复杂的网络结构影响长期记忆和短期记忆的处理。
J Mem Lang. 2012 Jul 1;67(1):30-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.008.
5
Understanding human navigation using network analysis.利用网络分析理解人类导航。
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;4(1):121-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01178.x.
6
Simulating retrieval from a highly clustered network: implications for spoken word recognition.模拟从高度聚类网络中检索:对口语单词识别的影响。
Front Psychol. 2011 Dec 14;2:369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00369. eCollection 2011.
7
The large-scale structure of semantic networks: statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth.语义网络的大规模结构:统计分析和语义增长模型。
Cogn Sci. 2005 Jan 2;29(1):41-78. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2901_3.
8
Network structure influences speech production.网络结构影响言语产生。
Cogn Sci. 2010 May;34(4):685-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01100.x.
9
The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.音系近邻聚类系数对口语词汇识别的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1934-49. doi: 10.1037/a0016902.
10
Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.超越库切拉和弗朗西斯:当前词频规范的批判性评估,以及美国英语新的、经过改进的词频衡量标准的引入。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977.