Graham Adam J, Orini Michele, Lambiase Pier D
Barts Heart Centre, London.
Institute of Cardiovascular Science, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2017 Aug;6(3):118-124. doi: 10.15420/aer.2017.20.1.
Recurrent episodes of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease are associated with increased mortality and morbidity, despite the life-saving benefits of implantable cardiac defibrillators. Reducing implantable cardiac defibrillator therapies is important, as recurrent shocks can cause increased myocardial damage and stunning, despite the conversion of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. Catheter ablation has emerged as a potential therapeutic option either for primary or secondary prevention of these arrhythmias, particularly in post-myocardial infarction cases where the substrate is well defined. However, the outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease remain unsatisfactory in comparison with other electrophysiological procedures. The disappointing efficacy of ventricular tachycardia ablation in structural heart disease is multifactorial. In this review, we discuss the issues surrounding this and examine the limitations of current mapping approaches, as well as newer technologies that might help address them.
尽管植入式心脏除颤器具有挽救生命的益处,但结构性心脏病患者反复出现室性心动过速与死亡率和发病率增加相关。减少植入式心脏除颤器治疗很重要,因为尽管室性心动过速/心室颤动得以转复,但反复电击会导致心肌损伤和顿抑加重。导管消融已成为这些心律失常一级或二级预防的潜在治疗选择,特别是在心肌梗死后期病例中,其基质已明确界定。然而,与其他电生理手术相比,结构性心脏病患者室性心动过速导管消融的结果仍不尽人意。结构性心脏病患者室性心动过速消融疗效令人失望是多因素造成的。在本综述中,我们讨论围绕此问题的相关事宜,并审视当前标测方法的局限性以及可能有助于解决这些问题的新技术。