Niu Ziru, Pang Ronald T K, Liu Weimin, Li Qian, Cheng Ranran, Yeung William S B
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
Center of Reproduction, Development, and Growth, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0186534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186534. eCollection 2017.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound vesicles released by cells and act as media for transfer of proteins, small RNAs and mRNAs to distant sites. They can be isolated by different methods. However, the biological activities of the purified EVs have seldom been studied. In this study, we compared the use of ultracentrifugation (UC), ultra-filtration (UF), polymer-based precipitation (PBP), and PBP with size-based purification (PBP+SP) for isolation of EVs from human endometrial cells and mouse uterine luminal fluid (ULF). Electron microscopy revealed that the diameters of the isolated EVs were similar among the tested methods. UF recovered the highest number of EVs followed by PBP, while UC and PBP+SP were significantly less efficient (P<0.05). Based on the number of EVs-to-protein ratios, PBP had the least protein contamination, significantly better than the other methods (P<0.05). All the isolated EVs expressed exosome-enriched proteins CD63, TSG101 and HSP70. Incubation of the trophoblast JEG-3 cells with an equal amount of the fluorescence-labelled EVs isolated by the studied methods showed that many of the PBP-EVs treated cells were fluorescence positive but only a few cells were labelled in the UC- and UF-EVs treated groups. Moreover, the PBP-EVs could transfer significantly more miRNA to the recipient cells than the other 3 methods (P<0.05). The PBP method could isolate EVs from mouse ULF; the diameter of the isolated EVs was 62±19 nm and expressed CD63, TSG101 and HSP70 proteins. In conclusion, PBP could best preserve the activities of the isolated EVs among the 4 methods studied and was able to isolate EVs from a small volume of sample. The simple setup and low equipment demands makes PBP the most suitable method for rapid EV assessment and isolation of EVs in clinical and basic research settings.
细胞外囊泡(EVs)是细胞释放的膜结合囊泡,作为蛋白质、小RNA和mRNA转移至远处位点的介质。它们可以通过不同方法分离。然而,纯化的EVs的生物学活性鲜有研究。在本研究中,我们比较了使用超速离心(UC)、超滤(UF)、基于聚合物的沉淀法(PBP)以及基于大小的纯化法的PBP(PBP+SP)从人子宫内膜细胞和小鼠子宫腔液(ULF)中分离EVs的效果。电子显微镜显示,在测试方法中,分离出的EVs直径相似。超滤回收的EVs数量最多,其次是PBP,而超速离心和PBP+SP的效率显著较低(P<0.05)。基于EVs与蛋白质的比例,PBP的蛋白质污染最少,明显优于其他方法(P<0.05)。所有分离出的EVs均表达富含外泌体的蛋白质CD63、TSG101和HSP70。用等量通过研究方法分离的荧光标记EVs孵育滋养层JEG-3细胞,结果显示,许多经PBP-EVs处理的细胞呈荧光阳性,但在经UC-EVs和UF-EVs处理的组中只有少数细胞被标记。此外,PBP-EVs向受体细胞转移的miRNA明显多于其他3种方法(P<0.05)。PBP方法可以从小鼠ULF中分离出EVs;分离出的EVs直径为62±19 nm,并表达CD63、TSG101和HSP70蛋白。总之,在研究的4种方法中,PBP最能保留分离出的EVs的活性,并且能够从少量样品中分离出EVs。其简单的设置和低设备要求使PBP成为临床和基础研究中快速评估和分离EVs的最合适方法。