Suppr超能文献

Etest法测定的黏菌素和多黏菌素B最低抑菌浓度对革兰氏阴性杆菌不可靠。

Colistin and Polymyxin B Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations Determined by Etest Found Unreliable for Gram-Negative Bacilli.

作者信息

Simar Shelby, Sibley Diane, Ashcraft Deborah, Pankey George

机构信息

Laboratory of Infectious Disease Translational Research, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA.

出版信息

Ochsner J. 2017 Fall;17(3):239-242.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A reliable method of polymyxin B and E (colistin) susceptibility testing remains elusive. These drugs diffuse poorly into agar, creating potentially inaccurate Etest and disk diffusion results, and testing by these methods is not recommended. Broth microdilution is the reference testing method, although it can be sometimes difficult to interpret. Currently, when a colistin susceptibility test is ordered for a patient in the Ochsner Health System, our diagnostic microbiology laboratory performs the Etest. As an in-house quality assessment project, we compared colistin and polymyxin B minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) determined by Etest with MICs determined by broth microdilution to evaluate whether colistin MICs are accurately being reported by Etest.

METHODS

A total of 143 nonduplicate clinical isolates from Ochsner patients during 2015-2016 were tested: (n=60), (n=44), and Enterobacteriaceae (n=39) (13 , 15 spp, and 11 spp). Colistin and polymyxin B MICs were determined by Etest and broth microdilution.

RESULTS

Using broth microdilution, 16/143 (11%) isolates were nonsusceptible to colistin, and 12/143 (8%) were nonsusceptible to polymyxin B. With Etest, 4/143 (3%) isolates were nonsusceptible to colistin, and 7/143 (5%) were nonsusceptible to polymyxin B. Essential agreement of colistin and polymyxin B MICs between broth microdilution and Etest was 84/143 (59%) and 87/143 (61%), respectively. Categorical agreement for colistin and polymyxin B was 127/143 (89%) and 126/143 (88%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found a high rate of discrepancy between colistin and polymyxin B Etest and broth microdilution MICs. Very major errors (colistin/polymyxin B-susceptible by Etest, colistin/polymyxin B-resistant by broth microdilution) were detected in 10% of isolates tested with colistin and 8% of polymyxin B-tested isolates. The data from this study confirm that broth microdilution should be performed for susceptibility testing of polymyxins.

摘要

背景

多黏菌素B和E(黏菌素)药敏试验的可靠方法仍未找到。这些药物在琼脂中扩散性差,导致Etest和纸片扩散法的结果可能不准确,不推荐使用这些方法进行检测。肉汤微量稀释法是参考检测方法,尽管有时难以解读。目前,在奥克施纳医疗系统中,当为患者开具黏菌素药敏试验医嘱时,我们的诊断微生物实验室采用Etest法。作为一项内部质量评估项目,我们将通过Etest法测定的黏菌素和多黏菌素B的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)与通过肉汤微量稀释法测定的MIC进行比较,以评估Etest法报告的黏菌素MIC是否准确。

方法

对2015 - 2016年期间从奥克施纳患者中分离出的143株非重复临床菌株进行检测:铜绿假单胞菌(n = 60)、鲍曼不动杆菌(n = 44)和肠杆菌科细菌(n = 39)(13株肺炎克雷伯菌、15株大肠埃希菌和11株其他肠杆菌科细菌)。通过Etest法和肉汤微量稀释法测定黏菌素和多黏菌素B的MIC。

结果

采用肉汤微量稀释法时,16/143(11%)的菌株对黏菌素不敏感,12/143(8%)的菌株对多黏菌素B不敏感。采用Etest法时,4/143(3%)的菌株对黏菌素不敏感,7/143(5%)的菌株对多黏菌素B不敏感。肉汤微量稀释法与Etest法测定的黏菌素和多黏菌素B的MIC的基本一致性分别为84/143(59%)和87/143(61%)。黏菌素和多黏菌素B的分类一致性分别为127/143(89%)和126/143(88%)。

结论

我们发现黏菌素和多黏菌素B的Etest法与肉汤微量稀释法测定的MIC之间存在较高的差异率。在用黏菌素检测的菌株中,10%检测到非常大的误差(Etest法显示黏菌素/多黏菌素B敏感,肉汤微量稀释法显示黏菌素/多黏菌素B耐药),在用多黏菌素B检测的菌株中,8%检测到非常大的误差。本研究数据证实,应采用肉汤微量稀释法进行多黏菌素的药敏试验。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Analysis of colistin resistance in carbapenem-resistant and XDR .耐碳青霉烯类和广泛耐药菌中黏菌素耐药性分析
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 26;9:20499361221080650. doi: 10.1177/20499361221080650. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验