• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎减压融合术的微创技术

Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar decompressions and fusions.

作者信息

Narain Ankur S, Hijji Fady Y, Markowitz Jonathan S, Kudaravalli Krishna T, Yom Kelly H, Singh Kern

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.

出版信息

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9446-z.

DOI:10.1007/s12178-017-9446-z
PMID:29027622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5685968/
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this study is to summarize the recent literature investigating the use of minimally invasive (MIS) techniques in the treatment of lumbar degenerative stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and scoliosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

MIS lumbar decompression and fusion techniques for degenerative pathology are associated with reduced operative morbidity, shortened length of hospital stay, and reduced postoperative pain and narcotics utilization. Recent studies with long-term clinical follow-up have demonstrated equivalence in clinical outcomes between open and MIS surgical procedures. Radiographically, MIS procedures provide adequate postoperative correction of coronal alignment. Correction of sagittal alignment, however, is more variable based on current reports. MIS techniques are both safe and effective in the treatment of lumbar degenerative pathologies. While some studies have reported on long-term outcomes and costs associated with MIS procedures, more investigation into these topics is still necessary. Additionally, further work is required to analyze the training requirements and learning curves of MIS procedures to better promote adoption amongst surgeons.

摘要

综述目的

本研究旨在总结近期有关微创(MIS)技术在腰椎退变性狭窄、腰椎滑脱和脊柱侧凸治疗中应用的文献。

最新发现

用于退行性病变的MIS腰椎减压和融合技术与手术发病率降低、住院时间缩短以及术后疼痛和麻醉药物使用减少相关。近期的长期临床随访研究表明,开放手术和MIS手术的临床结果相当。在影像学方面,MIS手术能在术后提供足够的冠状面矫正。然而,根据目前的报告,矢状面矫正的情况则更具变异性。MIS技术在治疗腰椎退行性病变方面既安全又有效。虽然一些研究报告了与MIS手术相关的长期结果和成本,但仍需要对这些主题进行更多研究。此外,还需要进一步开展工作来分析MIS手术的培训要求和学习曲线,以更好地促进外科医生采用该技术。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar decompressions and fusions.腰椎减压融合术的微创技术
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9446-z.
2
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单纯减压治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的对比研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18722.
3
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放融合手术:质量结果数据库分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188.
4
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的比较:有效性和成本效用分析。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Jul-Aug;82(1-2):230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.041. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
5
A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.一项比较单节段微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的围手术期成本分析。
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.053. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
6
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
7
Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.选择性腰椎椎间融合术后使用微创融合技术是否与更好的疗效相关?一项全国性前瞻性患者报告结局登记研究的分析。
Spine J. 2017 Jul;17(7):922-932. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].[象限通道下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度退行性腰椎滑脱症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002.
9
Cost minimization in treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.成人退变性脊柱侧凸治疗中的成本最小化
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec;23(6):798-806. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE14560. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
10
Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的比较疗效:对麻醉药物使用、重返工作岗位、残疾状况及生活质量的2年评估
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Dec;24(8):479-84. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182055cac.

引用本文的文献

1
Pedicle Screws and Facet Violation - The importance of the Angle between the Facet and the Screw.椎弓根螺钉与小关节侵犯——小关节与螺钉之间角度的重要性。
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020 Oct;55(5):642-648. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709200. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
2
Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Boomerang-Shaped Cage with Traditional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.使用回旋镖形椎间融合器的经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与传统后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的比较
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018 Jul 25;3(1):71-78. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0022. eCollection 2019 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的对比
Indian J Orthop. 2016 Sep;50(5):464-472. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.189607.
2
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes.经单侧入路行L5-S1微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:技术可行性及疗效
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2518394. doi: 10.1155/2016/2518394. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
3
Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Outcomes, and Complications.腰椎外侧椎间融合术:适应症、疗效及并发症
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Feb;24(2):96-105. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00208.
4
Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.腰椎侧方椎间融合术
Asian Spine J. 2015 Dec;9(6):978-83. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.6.978. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
5
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创与开放椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(2):E91-E100. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001161.
6
Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis: systematic review and current concepts.退行性腰椎管狭窄症行椎板切除术后的医源性腰椎滑脱:系统评价与当前概念
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E9. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15259.
7
Minimally invasive lumbar decompression-the surgical learning curve.微创腰椎减压术——手术学习曲线
Spine J. 2016 Aug;16(8):909-16. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.455. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
8
The concave versus convex approach for minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion for thoracolumbar degenerative scoliosis.用于胸腰椎退变性脊柱侧弯的微创外侧腰椎椎间融合术的凹面与凸面入路
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Oct;22(10):1588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
9
Considerations When Contemplating Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
World Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;84(5):1205-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.053. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
10
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱:峡部裂性腰椎滑脱与退变性腰椎滑脱的比较
World Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;84(5):1284-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 11.