Shamsuzzaman Md, Bommakanti Ananth, Zapinsky Aviva, Rahman Nusrat, Pascual Clarence, Lindahl Lasse
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 13;12(10):e0186494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186494. eCollection 2017.
Abrogation of ribosome synthesis (ribosomal stress) leads to cell cycle arrest. However, the immediate cell response to cessation of ribosome formation and the transition from normal cell proliferation to cell cycle arrest have not been characterized. Furthermore, there are conflicting conclusions about whether cells are arrested in G2/M or G1, and whether the cause is dismantling ribosomal assembly per se, or the ensuing decreased number of translating ribosomes. To address these questions, we have compared the time kinetics of key cell cycle parameters after inhibiting ribosome formation or function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Within one-to-two hours of repressing genes for individual ribosomal proteins or Translation Elongation factor 3, configurations of spindles, spindle pole bodies began changing. Actin began depolarizing within 4 hours. Thus the loss of ribosome formation and function is sensed immediately. After several hours no spindles or mitotic actin rings were visible, but membrane ingression was completed in most cells and Ace2 was localized to daughter cell nuclei demonstrating that the G1 stage was reached. Thus cell division was completed without the help of a contractile actin ring. Moreover, cell wall material held mother and daughter cells together resulting in delayed cell separation, suggesting that expression or function of daughter gluconases and chitinases is inhibited. Moreover, cell development changes in very similar ways in response to inhibition of ribosome formation and function, compatible with the notion that decreased translation capacity contributes to arresting the cell cycle after abrogation of ribosome biogenesis. Potential implications for the mechanisms of diseases caused by mutations in ribosomal genes (ribosomopathies) are discussed.
核糖体合成的废除(核糖体应激)会导致细胞周期停滞。然而,细胞对核糖体形成停止的即时反应以及从正常细胞增殖到细胞周期停滞的转变尚未得到明确描述。此外,关于细胞是停滞在G2/M期还是G1期,以及原因是核糖体组装本身的拆解,还是随之而来的正在翻译的核糖体数量减少,存在相互矛盾的结论。为了解决这些问题,我们比较了在酿酒酵母中抑制核糖体形成或功能后关键细胞周期参数的时间动力学。在抑制单个核糖体蛋白或翻译延伸因子3的基因后的一到两小时内,纺锤体、纺锤极体的形态开始发生变化。肌动蛋白在4小时内开始去极化。因此,核糖体形成和功能的丧失能被立即感知到。几小时后,看不到纺锤体或有丝分裂肌动蛋白环,但大多数细胞完成了细胞膜内陷,Ace2定位于子细胞核,表明细胞进入了G1期。因此,细胞分裂在没有收缩性肌动蛋白环的帮助下完成。此外,细胞壁物质将母细胞和子细胞连接在一起,导致细胞分离延迟,这表明子细胞葡萄糖苷酶和几丁质酶的表达或功能受到抑制。此外,细胞发育对核糖体形成和功能抑制的反应方式非常相似,这与翻译能力下降导致核糖体生物合成废除后细胞周期停滞的观点一致。我们还讨论了核糖体基因突变(核糖体病)所引起疾病机制的潜在影响。